OK - so there is this bat that I have been looking at for an hour or so. The only reason I looked at the auction more closely is because the seller (in my opinion) has sold some "interesting" items in the past...
However, this item seems legit and comes with a Cardinals LOA. Upon closer inspection, the bat is an Aramis Ramirez model X Bat that is being sold as a Pujols gamer.
This is the puzzling part. In the NOTES section, the wording goes like this:
"it is assumed by the clubhouse attendants that this bat was used by Albert Pujols"
ASSUMED? ASSUMED? How about - "according to the clubhouse staff, this bat was used by Albert Pujols...I don't understand how they could sell something as potentially valuable as a Pujols gamer and ASSUME that Albert used it...in the PLAYOFFS no less.
Are teams mandated to used the word assumed? Here is the link....
However, this item seems legit and comes with a Cardinals LOA. Upon closer inspection, the bat is an Aramis Ramirez model X Bat that is being sold as a Pujols gamer.
This is the puzzling part. In the NOTES section, the wording goes like this:
"it is assumed by the clubhouse attendants that this bat was used by Albert Pujols"
ASSUMED? ASSUMED? How about - "according to the clubhouse staff, this bat was used by Albert Pujols...I don't understand how they could sell something as potentially valuable as a Pujols gamer and ASSUME that Albert used it...in the PLAYOFFS no less.
Are teams mandated to used the word assumed? Here is the link....
Comment