Bat Luster

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • frikativ54
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2007
    • 3612

    Bat Luster

    Last night, the Mariners were having a 40% off sale on game used, so I bought the following Louisville Slugger bat of Eduardo Perez. My parents ate lunch with him at Benihana's in the mid-1990s when he was with the California Angels. He signed a notecard for me, and I still have it. So - the bat makes a welcome addition to my collection.

    Which brings me to a question: the Perez bat, which is from 2006, has a visible luster. I don't have many bats, but the Bagwell 1998 bat I have doesn't show any luster at all. Here are pictures, so you can compare:



    Perez Bat



    Bagwell Bat

    Is there any reason for the difference in luster?

    Thanks!
    Les Zukor
    bagwellgameused@gmail.com
    Collecting Jeff Bagwell Cleats, Jerseys, & Other Items

    http://www.bagwellgameused.com
    (617) 682-0408
  • Birdbats
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2005
    • 1439

    #2
    Re: Bat Luster

    The Perez could have a Smith finish; the Bagwell has a regular black finish. The Smith finish seals the wood grain and makes the bat much shinier.
    Jeff Scott
    birdbats@charter.net
    http://www.birdbats.com

    Comment

    • jetersbatboy
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2008
      • 1903

      #3
      Re: Bat Luster

      I have noticed with the smith finish they sometimes crack i have a couple jeter bats that are cracking and flaking due to the finish.

      Comment

      Working...