Consider this bat to be photo-matched? Opinions?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Number9
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2006
    • 606

    Consider this bat to be photo-matched? Opinions?

    Wow, what a day. Financial nightmare and time in a dentist's chair. Good night to get engrossed in a hobby. Hope everyone keeps their jobs.
    Anyhoo, do you guys consider this bat to be a photomatch? I think it is the same bat, there's several things that match, the dot near the knob, some pine tar near the knob, the grains on the barrel in relation to the stampings, a ballmark on the barrel, BUT he loaded it up with pine tar again after this photo was taken so that doesn't match. So I can't decide if this should be called a photo-matched bat or not.
    The photo is from the playoffs and this is an uncracked bat he left behind after the season so that checks out too.
    By the way, the rosin you see on the bat in the photo of him at the plate, is under the new coat of pinetar on my bat, so that is there too, just covered up mostly now by pine tar.
    Consider this bat photomatched or not?
    Thanks for opinions.

    ML
    Attached Files
  • Number9
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2006
    • 606

    #2
    Re: Consider this bat to be photo-matched? Opinions?

    PS, sorry for the big photos, I thought I re-sized them all. I guess not.

    Comment

    • Vintagedeputy
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2005
      • 3172

      #3
      Re: Consider this bat to be photo-matched? Opinions?

      Its a match....everything that remains on the bat matches up.

      Comment

      • Rob L
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2005
        • 1237

        #4
        Re: Consider this bat to be photo-matched? Opinions?

        I'm not Kyle, but it looks like a match too me.
        Rob L
        loefflerrd@cox.net

        Always On the Look Out for Troy Percival & Randy Johnson Gamers

        Rob L's Baseball Memorabilia website: GU Troy Percival, GU Randy Johnson, GU Angels, GU Baseball, 19th Century Baseball and Autographs. Also a huge Game Used Resource page and Game Used Collectors Page: www.loefflerrd.webs.com

        Comment

        • brianborsch
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2005
          • 1704

          #5
          Re: Consider this bat to be photo-matched? Opinions?

          Is it me or does the pine tar in the game photo have dust or dirt on it, but the pine tar on e bat in a still shot is just straight tar. Couldn't be a match right? Still a nice bat though...b

          Comment

          • corsairs22
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2008
            • 103

            #6
            Re: Consider this bat to be photo-matched? Opinions?

            Doug might have put some fresh pine tar on it after the photo was taken, so it could still be a match. No?

            Comment

            • HENMICK44
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2008
              • 964

              #7
              Re: Consider this bat to be photo-matched? Opinions?

              Interested In Selling It????????????
              henmick44@optonline.net

              Comment

              • Number9
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2006
                • 606

                #8
                Re: Consider this bat to be photo-matched? Opinions?

                Yeah, that's what I mean. He loaded it up with pine tar again so that has changed on the bat since the photo. As I said, you can see the white rosin under the new pine tar on the actual bat now.

                There's also another good blue ballmark on the bat barrel since the photo so he used it after the photo was taken for sure.

                But that is the crux of my question, and maybe it is more philosophical than physical: If a bat has changed since a photo (changes made by the player's use) do you still consider if a photo-match?
                Thanks guys.

                Mike

                Comment

                • corsairs22
                  Senior Member
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 103

                  #9
                  Re: Consider this bat to be photo-matched? Opinions?

                  Mike, if you can still ID the bat with the photo, then yes, it is a match. I guess I look at this as a forensic exercise.

                  Comment

                  • joelsabi
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2005
                    • 3073

                    #10
                    Re: Consider this bat to be photo-matched? Opinions?

                    Originally posted by Number9
                    Yeah, that's what I mean. He loaded it up with pine tar again so that has changed on the bat since the photo. As I said, you can see the white rosin under the new pine tar on the actual bat now.

                    There's also another good blue ballmark on the bat barrel since the photo so he used it after the photo was taken for sure.

                    But that is the crux of my question, and maybe it is more philosophical than physical: If a bat has changed since a photo (changes made by the player's use) do you still consider if a photo-match?
                    Thanks guys.

                    Mike

                    good question. there seems to be permanent marks on the bat that would seem to be a match. but is it now a photo match.

                    if you have a photo matched bat and your son accidentally uses for batting practice in the backyard, is it still a photomatched bat?
                    Regards,
                    Joel S.
                    joelsabi @ gmail.com
                    Wanted: Alex Rodriguez Game Used Items and other unique artifacts, 1992 thru 1998 only. From High School to Early Mariners.

                    Comment

                    • Number9
                      Senior Member
                      • Mar 2006
                      • 606

                      #11
                      Re: Consider this bat to be photo-matched? Opinions?

                      Thanks guys.

                      To me, its the same bat as there's about 5 things that match, BUT I am reluctact to label it a 'photo match' since he has used it more and made it look different by adding more pine tar.

                      On the white rosin, it appears sometimes he bats with pine tar only, and other times he adds rosin on top of it. I am guessing it has something to do with sweat on his hands and the fact that he doesn't use batting gloves.

                      Not looking to sell it, just trying to decide if I could/should consider it a photo-match or not. Always interested in the opinions of other collectors.

                      Mike

                      Comment

                      • Rob L
                        Senior Member
                        • Nov 2005
                        • 1237

                        #12
                        Re: Consider this bat to be photo-matched? Opinions?

                        Definite photo match with subsequent use.
                        Attached Files
                        Rob L
                        loefflerrd@cox.net

                        Always On the Look Out for Troy Percival & Randy Johnson Gamers

                        Rob L's Baseball Memorabilia website: GU Troy Percival, GU Randy Johnson, GU Angels, GU Baseball, 19th Century Baseball and Autographs. Also a huge Game Used Resource page and Game Used Collectors Page: www.loefflerrd.webs.com

                        Comment

                        • indyred
                          Senior Member
                          • May 2006
                          • 952

                          #13
                          Re: Consider this bat to be photo-matched? Opinions?

                          Nice work Rob L. Solid match from your breakdown. I love how eyechart cakes up his bats. I've seen a few of his helmets as well and he looks like he dumps pine tar on them also.

                          Comment

                          • Number9
                            Senior Member
                            • Mar 2006
                            • 606

                            #14
                            Re: Consider this bat to be photo-matched? Opinions?

                            That's awesome Rob, thanks very much. I saw a lot of those but never could have displayed it as neatly and well as you just did. Thanks for the effort and help.

                            Mike

                            Comment

                            • skyking26
                              Senior Member
                              • Dec 2005
                              • 2457

                              #15
                              Re: Consider this bat to be photo-matched? Opinions?

                              This is a no brainer here...definate photomatch. It amazes me how you guys find such exact pics. There was a guy on here with a Youkilus helmet some time ago that amazed me. Number 9 and the guy with that Youkilus helmet...if you are not doing forensic work as a career you have a calling...

                              RK
                              ROBERT KOPPEL
                              Skyking26 - 35 year collector of Dave Kingman memorabilia. Also seek 500 HR and 3000 Hit GU Bats,
                              and 1968, 1984, HOF Tigers GU Bats...Skyking442@hotmail.com

                              Comment

                              Working...