Leland's 1969 Hank Aaron bat I don't think so....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mark17
    Senior Member
    • May 2006
    • 379

    Leland's 1969 Hank Aaron bat I don't think so....

    I'm wondering what's going on with this one:



    The description says:
    "One of the true rarities, a bat of a major player which can be tied to a specific at bat. This bat was obtained from Luis Peraza who pitched to Hank Aaron and struck him out. On the second strike Aaron cracked this bat and got another one from the dugout and received his third strike and a K from Peraza. After the game Peraza approached friend Orlando Cepeda and teammate of Aaron’s and asked if he could have the bat. Aaron agreed but comically lamented that he had to not only be struck out but had to give him his bat as well. Louisville Slugger A99 is cracked with nice use. 35”. Fantastic LOA in great detail; from Luis Peraza."

    Well, Peraza's career consisted of 8 games in 1969. But can anyone tell me what's wrong with this bat?

    I thought the people at Leland's were pretty sharp and would've caught this rather obvious inconsistency.
    Attached Files
  • W_EISENHUTH
    Member
    • Sep 2005
    • 63

    #2
    Re: Leland's 1969 Hank Aaron bat I don't think so....

    '73-'75 era?

    Comment

    • Mark17
      Senior Member
      • May 2006
      • 379

      #3
      Re: Leland's 1969 Hank Aaron bat I don't think so....

      yup. How in the world did they miss that?

      Comment

      • hiflyer56
        Banned
        • Jul 2009
        • 223

        #4
        Re: Leland's 1969 Hank Aaron bat I don't think so....

        Wow .... Is it even a true Aaron gamer?

        Comment

        • Mark17
          Senior Member
          • May 2006
          • 379

          #5
          Re: Leland's 1969 Hank Aaron bat I don't think so....

          I called Leland's and they courteously returned my call and confirmed the bat is a 1973-75 model. So I said, "Well, that blows your entire story of provenance, because that pitcher's career began and ended in 1969." He said he'd make note of it on the auction listing (bids are over $1500 now.)

          I'll be very curious to see how they handle this. In my opinion, the listing is completely compromised, the bat clearly is not what it is described as being, and the item should simply be withdrawn. It still amazes me they didn't catch this sooner, because I've always held Leland's in high regard.

          Comment

          • cmw2ward
            Senior Member
            • Dec 2007
            • 171

            #6
            Re: Leland's 1969 Hank Aaron bat I don't think so....

            Mark17,

            Thanks for the tip! I was thinking of bidding, but not now!

            Best,
            Tim

            Comment

            • ironmanfan
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2005
              • 2252

              #7
              Re: Leland's 1969 Hank Aaron bat I don't think so....

              Lelands is a quality outfit; I'm confident they'll do what is right

              Comment

              • Vintagedeputy
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2005
                • 3172

                #8
                Re: Leland's 1969 Hank Aaron bat I don't think so....

                Well, there is some truth to the story.

                On May 25, 1969, Peraza faced the Bravos in his only appearance against them. The box score from the inning where he faced the Hammer says that he pitched to Aaron in the bottom of the 6th, struck him out and Felix Millan was caught stealing for a double play.

                Comment

                • bigtruck260
                  Senior Member
                  • Sep 2007
                  • 1729

                  #9
                  Re: Leland's 1969 Hank Aaron bat I don't think so....

                  I wonder sometimes about players than milk one incident for eternity...

                  I see Mike Torrez at autgraph shows signing photos of Bucky Dent and things along those lines.

                  Maybe it's just a case of a pitcher trying to cash in on his one gleaning moment as a MLB player...or pawning off something in his home to a gullible person who would believe in something like this.

                  Silly. They still have it up.
                  Dave
                  Looking for 1990's STL Cardinal starting pitcher's bats
                  River City Redbird Authentics
                  http://www.freewebs.com/bigtruck260/

                  sigpic

                  Comment

                  • ironmanfan
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2005
                    • 2252

                    #10
                    Re: Leland's 1969 Hank Aaron bat I don't think so....

                    Originally posted by bigtruck260
                    I wonder sometimes about players than milk one incident for eternity...

                    I see Mike Torrez at autgraph shows signing photos of Bucky Dent and things along those lines.

                    Maybe it's just a case of a pitcher trying to cash in on his one gleaning moment as a MLB player...or pawning off something in his home to a gullible person who would believe in something like this.

                    Silly. They still have it up.
                    While a great accomplishment, Don Larsen has been milking that no-hitter/perfect game for over 50 years.......Two years earlier, he went 3-21 with the Orioles

                    Comment

                    • griffeyfan
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2007
                      • 179

                      #11
                      Re: Leland's 1969 Hank Aaron bat I don't think so....

                      Nice catch Mark17. Many thanks to you as I was about to put some hard earned money towards this one. Lelands just withdrew the auction.

                      Comment

                      • Mark17
                        Senior Member
                        • May 2006
                        • 379

                        #12
                        Re: Leland's 1969 Hank Aaron bat I don't think so....

                        Thanks. Now, here's my confession; I DID bid on it myself before I spotted the problem.

                        I'd love to know what the whole story is. Did Peraza find a 73-75 Aaron bat somewhere and then write a bogus letter of provenance? Or did the story actually happen exactly as described, and somewhere along the line the bat was switched?

                        In any case, Leland's should've noticed the inconsistency immediately, but mistakes can happen. Bottom line is, they ended up doing the right thing, so in my mind their integrity is still 100% intact.

                        Comment

                        • legaleagle92481
                          Banned
                          • Oct 2009
                          • 2538

                          #13
                          Re: Leland's 1969 Hank Aaron bat I don't think so....

                          No shock this is not the first time something from a former player is not legit, auction houses relax when they get stuff like that and they should not.. Remember the late Al G. the Dodgers outfielder who made that famous catch on Joe Dimaggio in the World Series that time and how he auctioned off the "glove" but then later claimed he still had the glove? That is just one example off the top of my head.

                          Comment

                          • sox83cubs84
                            Banned
                            • Apr 2009
                            • 8902

                            #14
                            Re: Leland's 1969 Hank Aaron bat I don't think so....

                            Recalling anothe story like Legaleagle's, Shotgun Shuba consigned three Brooklyn jerseys to MEARS for auction. MEARS rejected one...a 1955 World Series jersey that Shuba's son acknowledged was purchased from a dealer, not kept all those years by Shotgun.

                            Dave M.
                            Chicago area

                            Comment

                            Working...