PDA

View Full Version : 1985-86 Michael Jordan Game Worn Sneakers?



drexler22
06-28-2010, 04:25 PM
I know the tag and shoe size of the Jordans a correct. But does anyone agree with me this is real deal?
http://offer.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewBids&item=280523221560

both-teams-played-hard
06-28-2010, 05:42 PM
WOW!
Even if they are not "game-used", they are original AJs and the auto looks good. Original retail AJs in good condition sell for a grand.
The listing was terrible. Bad keywords, bad category...they just might be the real deal.

both-teams-played-hard
06-28-2010, 05:44 PM
Just realized they are not a pair. Typed before reading:o

drexler22
06-28-2010, 08:32 PM
lol. so do you think the autograph is real, scans that clearly and perhaps faded?

drexler22
06-28-2010, 08:35 PM
also anyone know's why there are 2 shoe laces of white and black colour.

drexler22
06-29-2010, 07:30 PM
anyone else got any opinions on this piece

BrewCrewSackers
06-30-2010, 01:52 AM
Do people really use shoe size as a authenticator????:eek:

STLHAMMER32
06-30-2010, 10:27 AM
Do people really use shoe size as a authenticator????:eek:

It's no different then using the length of a bat or the weight of a bat when trying to authenticate it....or when looking at a jersey one of the most important things to consider is the size of the jersey. Shoe size is one factor but its not the only to consider....

spartanservitto
06-30-2010, 10:31 AM
Here is a shoe box (yes that is right), a shoebox signed by Jordan around this time. I actually got this for ridiculously cheap, and might make a cut autograph out of it. Hope this helps, it looks almost identical...

-Tony

ndestrucktable
06-30-2010, 02:20 PM
Your autograph on that shoe box is no good. The autograph on the sneakers is a nice legit example though.

STLHAMMER32
06-30-2010, 02:25 PM
Your autograph on that shoe box is no good. The autograph on the sneakers is a nice legit example though.

Signature on the box and on sneakers are legit in my opinion.

spartanservitto
06-30-2010, 04:03 PM
I disagree, but thanks for the response!

-Tony

mb23
07-03-2010, 04:11 PM
Very nice sig on that shoe, to bad it wasn't a pair. The shoe itself is a legit gamer.

IMO the box sig is also legit. Just a rush job, but the "t" in to is def Mike and The "m's" also.

Here is my pair of AJ I's signed in 1993 when he made his Upper Deck contract. Notice the lower back ankle heights. They are more of a mid-cut then the released pairs.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3515/3466495065_da477cf94c_o.jpg

ndestrucktable
07-03-2010, 11:32 PM
[quote=mb23;207520]Very nice sig on that shoe, to bad it wasn't a pair. The shoe itself is a legit gamer.

IMO the box sig is also legit. Just a rush job, but the "t" in to is def Mike and The "m's" also.

Here is my pair of AJ I's signed in 1993 when he made his Upper Deck contract. Notice the lower back ankle heights. They are more of a mid-cut then the released pairs.



Those are nice, I still say the MJ box is no good. The H isn't right, there are other issues with it imo. If you are happy with it that is all that matters, I personally wouldn't buy it for anthing.