manny sanguillen bat!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • momen55
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2006
    • 2202

    manny sanguillen bat!

    i have a k44, 36" from the 77-79 label period. how many of these did many order during this period?
  • The Lumber Company
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2005
    • 132

    #2
    Re: manny sanguillen bat!

    Dear sir,
    I am not really sure on the quantities but typically they are very big bats. I have two from that period and they both 36" or larger.
    As always I would be interested in this bat if you are looking to part with it.
    Regards,
    Marty
    thelumbercompany.com

    Comment

    • momen55
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2006
      • 2202

      #3
      Re: manny sanguillen bat!

      any info on this bat will greatly appreciated. thanks.

      Comment

      • soxwin1
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2005
        • 168

        #4
        Re: manny sanguillen bat!

        You should post this in the " ask about bat shipping records " section as you are more apt to get a reply there.

        Comment

        • JimCaravello
          Senior Member
          • Jan 1970
          • 1241

          #5
          Re: manny sanguillen bat!

          Hi Momen55 - great handle by the way...........

          During the 77-79 labeling period, Manny had 42 separate orders ( approximately 265 bats ) of K44 bats that varied in length from 36" to 37" with weights in the 33 ounce to 37 ounce range. He ordered a lot of different finishes too - Hickory, Galen, Wax, Flame Treated, Natural and Walker finished bats.

          Let me know the finish on your bat - the exact length and weight and we'll try to pin it down to a specific order ( or orders ) if you would like.

          Thanks, Jim - jcaravello@nc.rr.com

          Comment

          • momen55
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2006
            • 2202

            #6
            Re: manny sanguillen bat!

            jim,
            i know it is 36 inches but have no clue as to finish; i would say natural. as for weight, i don't know either. all i know is that it is pretty heavy compared to today's standards. well, let's see what we come up with.

            Comment

            • momen55
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2006
              • 2202

              #7
              Re: manny sanguillen bat!

              jim,

              here is the pic of the bat. you would know better that i what the finish is. it is 36" and i will weigh it tommorow.

              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00376.JPG
Views:	6
Size:	195.1 KB
ID:	635766

              Comment

              • MSpecht
                Moderator
                • Oct 2005
                • 1431

                #8
                Re: manny sanguillen bat!

                Hi Ivan--

                Here goes --

                !977-1979 Manny Sanguillen K44 36 inches in various finishes

                Natural finish or Wax finish: 12 bats as follows (this looks like Natural or Wax in photo)
                7/15/77 35.5 ounces 6 bats
                3/4/78 35 oz 3 bats
                3/6/78 35 oz 3 bats

                Other finishes for 1977-79 36 inch K44 Sanguillen bats (numbers approximate):
                Flame treated finish:23 bats
                Galen finish:28 bats
                Walker finish: 4 bats
                Hickory finish: 26 bats

                Mike Jackitout7@aol.com

                Comment

                • momen55
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2006
                  • 2202

                  #9
                  Re: manny sanguillen bat!

                  thanks mike. sorry for posting in too many forums.

                  Comment

                  • momen55
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 2202

                    #10
                    Re: manny sanguillen bat!

                    it is weighing 32.25 oz. now knowing that they loose weight over the years, i have no clue as to it's original weight; 33, 34, 35 maybe? i thought it would have been heavier due to the length. so anyway, jim and or mike, since you will know more than i, let me know.

                    mike, you emailed that manny ordered 35 and 35.5 oz bats. could this be one of them or has it lost too much weight?

                    Comment

                    Working...