Hey guys,
Another week, another helmet! (ha kidding, well kinda!)
Well, a buddy found a game used Titans helmet on craigslist and forwarded it to me, and I managed to contact the seller to obtain a few pictures. This guy I believe is not a collector AT ALL but I did manage to get info from him.
He said he had obtained it at a business conference, and everything looks VERY similar to my Eddie George game worn helmet.
So I guess my questions are:
1. What does the date code (I assume it's a date code) on the facemask "74910" mean? I do know how to date a helmet/facemask based on the 3-letter code, but am not familiar with the number codes.
2. I see the "72" sticker inside the helmet, but is the "D" written/stamped next to it indicate it's for a defensive player? Or am I missing something?
Any help is much appreciated - I've learned a lot in a short amount of time due to the great knowledge on this forum, but want to make sure I keep learning and not shooting myself in the foot. Because you know what happens when you "assume"...
Another week, another helmet! (ha kidding, well kinda!)
Well, a buddy found a game used Titans helmet on craigslist and forwarded it to me, and I managed to contact the seller to obtain a few pictures. This guy I believe is not a collector AT ALL but I did manage to get info from him.
He said he had obtained it at a business conference, and everything looks VERY similar to my Eddie George game worn helmet.
So I guess my questions are:
1. What does the date code (I assume it's a date code) on the facemask "74910" mean? I do know how to date a helmet/facemask based on the 3-letter code, but am not familiar with the number codes.
2. I see the "72" sticker inside the helmet, but is the "D" written/stamped next to it indicate it's for a defensive player? Or am I missing something?
Any help is much appreciated - I've learned a lot in a short amount of time due to the great knowledge on this forum, but want to make sure I keep learning and not shooting myself in the foot. Because you know what happens when you "assume"...
Comment