danesei@yahoo.com
09-16-2015, 07:20 AM
http://www.ebay.com/itm/221881721301
The above item is signed and authenticated by PSA/DNA as a Mitch Williams autograph, which is a cool thing. However, the seller says they don't have the COA card, which also means the new owner would need to pay PSA to have a new authentication issued. That's fine, and I really think most people won't care.
The stranger aspect of this jersey has to do with the year and wash tag. If I'm understanding 1990s Phillies BP jerseys correctly, the only year that had no name on back was 1993. If that's the case, wasn't Williams wearing #99 in '93?
Also, I have always been under the impression (perhaps incorrectly) that players wear really loose BP jerseys. I think (based upon completed auctions from Goldin and Hunt) that Williams wore size 48 from 1991-1993. I don't think the size 46 is too much of a stretch for size, but I also have no clue/concept of what size Green wore, either.
The above item is signed and authenticated by PSA/DNA as a Mitch Williams autograph, which is a cool thing. However, the seller says they don't have the COA card, which also means the new owner would need to pay PSA to have a new authentication issued. That's fine, and I really think most people won't care.
The stranger aspect of this jersey has to do with the year and wash tag. If I'm understanding 1990s Phillies BP jerseys correctly, the only year that had no name on back was 1993. If that's the case, wasn't Williams wearing #99 in '93?
Also, I have always been under the impression (perhaps incorrectly) that players wear really loose BP jerseys. I think (based upon completed auctions from Goldin and Hunt) that Williams wore size 48 from 1991-1993. I don't think the size 46 is too much of a stretch for size, but I also have no clue/concept of what size Green wore, either.