Steiner Auction

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nnunnari
    Banned
    • Sep 2006
    • 875

    Steiner Auction

    I just browsed the Steiner auction. Looks like a lot of shady game used items at best. Seems like Steiner is trying to use their brand name to flip a bunch of marginal items to the naive/novice game used collector. It will catch up to them one day, but it's a shame to see someone who doesn't need to do this, doing it.
  • carbonrosa
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2012
    • 200

    #2
    Re: Steiner Auction

    Which items do you find to be shady game-used pieces?

    Comment

    • yanks12025
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2006
      • 3118

      #3
      Re: Steiner Auction

      Originally posted by Nnunnari
      I just browsed the Steiner auction. Looks like a lot of shady game used items at best. Seems like Steiner is trying to use their brand name to flip a bunch of marginal items to the naive/novice game used collector. It will catch up to them one day, but it's a shame to see someone who doesn't need to do this, doing it.


      It would be great if you could post details about the lots and what is wrong with them. Also I thought there were forum rules about calling out stuff like this thread.

      Comment

      • Phil316
        Senior Member
        • May 2013
        • 1878

        #4
        Re: Steiner Auction

        Yup back in the day of GUU saying stuff like this without proof would get you banned immediately.

        Comment

        • seanbaseball
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2014
          • 792

          #5
          Re: Steiner Auction

          Lets hear what u believe to be bad?

          Comment

          • seanbaseball
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2014
            • 792

            #6
            Re: Steiner Auction

            I like how each game used bat says "Featured in this lot if a game used bat worthy of Cooperstown" LOL and they all say "In addition to the crack the bat show excellent use only increasing its value. This bat is authenticated by PSA/DNA and is sure to become a solid investment for its next owner as time goes by." LOL Sounds like I should buy them all

            Comment

            • admin_old

              #7
              Re: Steiner Auction

              Nick,

              Please post the specific items and your concerns. This thread could be helpful to collectors if you are more specific. Also, you should contact Dave at Steiner auctions with the items you are concerned about. Thanks.

              Doug

              Comment

              • truvalue123
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2014
                • 229

                #8
                Re: Steiner Auction

                I see 26 bats listed, and, 25 of them have PSA or MEARS letters...How can they be "shady"? Descriptions may be a bit goofy, but, don't see issues here..I didn't inspect every listing, but, the ones I did , like the Aaron which has a PSA Grade 7, seem to check out...maybe someone is trying to keep bidders away?

                Comment

                • seanbaseball
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2014
                  • 792

                  #9
                  Re: Steiner Auction

                  Originally posted by truvalue123
                  I see 26 bats listed, and, 25 of them have PSA or MEARS letters...How can they be "shady"? Descriptions may be a bit goofy, but, don't see issues here..I didn't inspect every listing, but, the ones I did , like the Aaron which has a PSA Grade 7, seem to check out...maybe someone is trying to keep bidders away?
                  LoL. Didnt think of that! The writeups are weak but it does seem that the items are mostly authenticated and kinda are what they are. I see some nice items in there that are cheap right now.

                  Comment

                  • Nnunnari
                    Banned
                    • Sep 2006
                    • 875

                    #10
                    Re: Steiner Auction

                    I'll post shortly.

                    Comment

                    • KGoldin
                      Senior Member
                      • Sep 2012
                      • 1672

                      #11
                      Re: Steiner Auction

                      I think it's a case of really bad descriptions and or titles not an attempt to be shady.

                      Comment

                      • Nnunnari
                        Banned
                        • Sep 2006
                        • 875

                        #12
                        Re: Steiner Auction

                        I agree with Ken, shady was a bad choice of words. I meant to say surprisingly low quality for an auction house like Steiner. I suggest everyone read the descriptions very carefully.
                        I found some of the descriptions to be very corny- heavy use and cracked makes this bat significantly more valuable than a bat with minimal use. Makes you believe they expect their bidders to be very uneducated in the hobby.
                        Best of luck to the bidders. Seems like there are a lot of items that people got stuck with and are trying to flip in a lesser known auction to recoup some of their money and I definitely was not trying to keep bidders away- calling attention to the auction is not the best way to do that.

                        Comment

                        • truvalue123
                          Senior Member
                          • Oct 2014
                          • 229

                          #13
                          Re: Steiner Auction

                          A bat with heavy use WOULD be more valuable than a bat with minimal use, correct? Cracking impacts value, yes, but, heavy use is good...

                          Comment

                          • truvalue123
                            Senior Member
                            • Oct 2014
                            • 229

                            #14
                            Re: Steiner Auction

                            Originally posted by Nnunnari
                            I agree with Ken, shady was a bad choice of words. I meant to say surprisingly low quality for an auction house like Steiner. I suggest everyone read the descriptions very carefully.
                            I found some of the descriptions to be very corny- heavy use and cracked makes this bat significantly more valuable than a bat with minimal use. Makes you believe they expect their bidders to be very uneducated in the hobby.
                            Best of luck to the bidders. Seems like there are a lot of items that people got stuck with and are trying to flip in a lesser known auction to recoup some of their money and I definitely was not trying to keep bidders away- calling attention to the auction is not the best way to do that.
                            equals this????? items look pretty good except for current price of Sheff bat...

                            Looks like a lot of shady game used items at best. Seems like Steiner is trying to use their brand name to flip a bunch of marginal items to the naive/novice game used collector. It will catch up to them one day, but it's a shame to see someone who doesn't need to do this, doing it.

                            Comment

                            • seanbaseball
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2014
                              • 792

                              #15
                              Re: Steiner Auction

                              So to summarize there isn't one item that is "Shady" in their auction. There are some lesser graded items which will go for lesser prices. Imagine that. The descriptions are generic at times but I don't find any of them attempting to be misleading. Seems like a post that needs a good old fashioned deleting.
                              I still haven't seen the list of items that are shady?

                              Comment

                              Working...