George Brett Pre Game From 1992?

[hblakewolf]

Offering in the latest American Memorabila auction, 1992 "game worn George Brett pre-game"

http://www.americanmemorabilia.com/A...ction_ID=42578


Lot 49: Early '90s George Brett Game-Worn, Signed Royals BP Jersey

Go Back | Read Description Bids:4Current Bid:$266Minimum Bid:$293Auction Ends: 04/24/2008Registered Account?
Please login to place a bid on this item.
New Account?
Click Here To Register

‹‹ Previous | Next ››
Picture Viewer Tutorial var sp1 = new Spry.Widget.SlidingPanels("panelwidget");

Early '90s George Brett Game-Worn, Signed Royals BP Jersey

When George Brett was wearing this size "44" batting practice pullover, he was putting the twilight exclamation marks on a Hall of Fame career. The Kansas City Royals lone representative in the Hall of Fame, Brett wore this BP jersey in the early '90s. All of the identifiers are single-color white tackle twill. Of special note is the "5" identifier on the left sleeve, as the Royals so distinctly fashioned on their BP jerseys. Blue/white/light blue trim circumvents the V-neck and sleeves. Brett signed the front (w/"1992") and verso ("6/29/92") in blue felt tip. Secured in the tail is a Rawlings size tag.

Authenticators

PSA/DNA Auction House Letter (Read Details)
100% Authentic Team (Read Details)

A previous Game Used Universe thread focused on a 1993 pre-game, specifically, the lack of a name on back:

http://www.gameuseduniverse.net/vb_f...ractice+jersey

QUESTION: Is this pre-game currently offereed by AMI correct for a 1992 Royals gamer, or should it have a name on back?

Any insight is appreciated.
Thanks.

Howard Wolf
hblakewolf@patmedia.net

[kingjammy24]

hey howard,

i saw that jersey. the autograph is dated to 1992 but there's nothing in the description or title that dates it to 1992. they call it "early 90s". not sure why brett affixed the 1992 dates other than to date when he signed it.

of course lampson could've actually earned his fee and more accurately called it a 1991 jersey which is the only year it could be given the style and tagging but i guess if i was trying to get through things as quickly as possible i'd probably just slap an "early 90s" moniker on it and call it a day.

rudy.