Results 1 to 10 of 15
Thread: This is a photo match, right?
-
04-17-2008, 09:51 AM #1
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 1,537
This is a photo match, right?
Just wanted opinions on whether this is a good photo match. The jersey was used 10/8/06, and that is when the photo is from:
-
04-17-2008, 09:52 AM #2
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 1,537
Re: This is a photo match, right?
I meant to mention, the photo match is on the spot on the right chest/armpit area.
-
04-17-2008, 10:11 AM #3
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 4,256
Re: This is a photo match, right?
From what I can tell I wouldnt call it a photo match. Even though you have a jersey with a smudge on the armpit and the pic you posted shows the same, in the pic you posted of the player he is at an angle where it is hard to tell because there are folds in the armpit area to see if the smudge matches up exact.
-
04-17-2008, 12:44 PM #4
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Posts
- 752
Re: This is a photo match, right?
It looks very close. The black mark looks to line up perfect. The distance from the seam is also pretty close if not a match. I see that there are a few marks on the shoulder. Can you match those?
-
04-17-2008, 12:47 PM #5
Re: This is a photo match, right?
The mesh holes around REDSKINS don't appear to match up.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Always looking for vintage game used bats of Houston Buffs and Colt .45's players.
-
04-17-2008, 12:55 PM #6
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 1,537
-
04-17-2008, 12:55 PM #7
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 1,537
-
04-17-2008, 01:04 PM #8
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 1,537
Re: This is a photo match, right?
Here's another area to the right of the "8" on the front. Looks to be blood?
-
04-17-2008, 02:47 PM #9
Re: This is a photo match, right?
I'm 99% sure its a match, although it looks to have been lightly washed since the marks were made.
-
04-17-2008, 02:49 PM #10
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 1,537