Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread: The Mets new Stadium
-
02-28-2009, 10:33 AM #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 347
The Mets new Stadium
Do you feel that a company that is receiving tax-payer bail out money from the Federal Government should still have thier company name on a stadium??? For example Citi-Field the home of the NY Mets??? Why do I see a problem with this???
Ham1963
-
02-28-2009, 11:41 AM #2Moderator
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 3,658
Re: The Mets new Stadium
Now that Government has 36% ownership...
metsbats86@aol.com
Always looking for 1973,1986,1988,1999,2000,2006 game used Mets post season and Bobby M. Jones and Ed Hearn NY Mets game used bats.
-
02-28-2009, 01:36 PM #3Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 181
Re: The Mets new Stadium
I hear people making this argument every day but the bottom line is that they signed a contract with the Mets in 2006 before they had financial problems and needed a bail out. It is a legal and binding contract that they have to fulfill, it is part of their debt. Unless they fold completely and file for bankruptcy I don't see why they should be free of their obligation to fulfil the contract. It is not like they made a deal after they got the bail out money.
Originally Posted by ham1963
__________________________________________________ _______________
Always looking for any Edgardo Alfonzo game used stuff!
cfiguer5@yahoo.com
-
02-28-2009, 10:57 PM #4Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 347
Re: The Mets new Stadium
Metsfan,
I agree with you but I still have a problem with this. All well I guess that I will just sit back and enjoy it.
John
ham1963
Reply With Quote
