Another Lampson Gem!

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hblakewolf
    Banned
    • Nov 2005
    • 1870

    Another Lampson Gem!

    How about this gem from Lampson!



    Not only is it void of the usual extra length tag found on Griffey gamers, but how about this for a description of the numbers, "Stitching on numbers is looser than factory norm suggesting possible local affixing"

    Click image for larger version

Name:	griffey loa.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	17.5 KB
ID:	723133

    Add this to the other clasic "Lampsonisms"

    Howard Wolf
    hblakewolf@comcast.net
  • hblakewolf
    Banned
    • Nov 2005
    • 1870

    #2
    Re: Another Lampson Gem!

    Also interesting is that the seller notes, "I am forced to sell a few items from my personal collection. My loss is your gain"

    I doubt Mitch will see a "loss" on this shirt that just sold in March 29th 2009 Vintage Authentics auction for $474.70 (which includes the buyers premium!).


    Lot 38. Ken Griffey Jr 2001 Game Used Jersey GU7 $474.70

    Howard Wolf
    hblakewolf@comcast.net

    Comment

    • trsent
      Banned
      • Nov 2005
      • 3739

      #3
      Re: Another Lampson Gem!

      Originally posted by hblakewolf
      Also interesting is that the seller notes, "I am forced to sell a few items from my personal collection. My loss is your gain"

      I doubt Mitch will see a "loss" on this shirt that just sold in March 29th 2009 Vintage Authentics auction for $474.70 (which includes the buyers premium!).


      Lot 38. Ken Griffey Jr 2001 Game Used Jersey GU7 $474.70

      Howard Wolf
      hblakewolf@comcast.net
      Howard, I am confused?

      What is your point? You don't like that the seller bought this recently and now says they need to sell items? What is your point?

      Oh by the way, did you email the seller, Vintage Authentics or Lou Lampson about your concerns with the letter? You mention issues that per forum rules must be asked prior to posting.

      You say it is void of an extra length tag so did you email any of these three about your concerns before posting questions on here? Are you not familiar with the forum rules found in these links?



      Comment

      • BULBUS
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2005
        • 1123

        #4
        Re: Another Lampson Gem!

        Originally posted by trsent
        Howard, I am confused?

        What is your point? You don't like that the seller bought this recently and now says they need to sell items? What is your point?

        Oh by the way, did you email the seller, Vintage Authentics or Lou Lampson about your concerns with the letter? You mention issues that per forum rules must be asked prior to posting.

        You say it is void of an extra length tag so did you email any of these three about your concerns before posting questions on here? Are you not familiar with the forum rules found in these links?



        http://www.gameuseduniverse.com/vb_f...ad.php?t=12446

        Is it possible to attach audio to your posts? If so, I think we need to attach a siren to Joels. I'm sorry, but its getting old, what did the seller say?, did you email your concerns?, what did lou say?, and so on. If you don't like the job that the people that run this site are doing, let them know (which I know you have done several times). If you dont like their response or lack of response to the situation, dont visit the site anymore. I believe in rules too, but seriously man, let the mods do their job. Again, I'm sorry, but enough is enough!

        -Chris
        Chris

        NY Giants, NY Yankees, Don Mattingly, Mattingly brand bats (any player)
        sigpic
        donnie23fan at yahoo.com

        Comment

        • otismalibu
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2005
          • 1650

          #5
          Re: Another Lampson Gem!

          I'm sorry, but its getting old...
          Joel the troll, that's how he roll.
          Greg
          DrJStuff.com

          Comment

          • JETEFAN
            Senior Member
            • Dec 2005
            • 528

            #6
            Re: Another Lampson Gem!

            I'm with Joel on this one, seems like lately there have been too many "Sherlock Holmes" wanta-be's on here (no one in particular) calling out people and items for sale. Nothing wrong with that as long as you are 100% sure of what you are claiming, no room for opinions when trashing someone...having said that, as per "FORUM RULES" before trashing someone and or their items, CONTACT THEM FIRST. You may be surprised and get a valid explanation on why ... they may not know the problem with their item in which case you would have done your job in pointing it out and they would have the opportunity to address the issue. It may just be an honest person with no malicious intent unaware of the problem... Makes sense don't ya think? Administration is not always available right away to monitor as they have been very busy with their new ventures (Platinum marketing, Forum Store, etc) No problem in pointing out the rules. Just my humble opinion..

            George

            Comment

            • mvandor
              Banned
              • Apr 2007
              • 1032

              #7
              Re: Another Lampson Gem!

              When Joel seriously asked if the poster tried to reach the unreachable Mr. Lampson, he pretty much undermined his point. I suggest if Joel feels a rule is being violated that he report the post involved to the actual mods instead of playing vigilante mod.

              Comment

              • BULBUS
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2005
                • 1123

                #8
                Re: Another Lampson Gem!

                Originally posted by JETEFAN
                I'm with Joel on this one, seems like lately there have been too many "Sherlock Holmes" wanta-be's on here (no one in particular) calling out people and items for sale. Nothing wrong with that as long as you are 100% sure of what you are claiming, no room for opinions when trashing someone...having said that, as per "FORUM RULES" before trashing someone and or their items, CONTACT THEM FIRST. You may be surprised and get a valid explanation on why ... they may not know the problem with their item in which case you would have done your job in pointing it out and they would have the opportunity to address the issue. It may just be an honest person with no malicious intent unaware of the problem... Makes sense don't ya think? Administration is not always available right away to monitor as they have been very busy with their new ventures (Platinum marketing, Forum Store, etc) No problem in pointing out the rules. Just my humble opinion..

                George
                Like I said, I'm all for the rule. I just dont think its Joesl job to enforce it. I believe if the poster doesnt include the response (or lack of after the mandatory time period), the post should be deleted and the poster suspended and then banned for repeat offenses.

                -Chris
                Chris

                NY Giants, NY Yankees, Don Mattingly, Mattingly brand bats (any player)
                sigpic
                donnie23fan at yahoo.com

                Comment

                • aeneas01
                  Senior Member
                  • May 2007
                  • 1128

                  #9
                  Re: Another Lampson Gem!

                  Originally posted by mvandor
                  When Joel seriously asked if the poster tried to reach the unreachable Mr. Lampson, he pretty much undermined his point. I suggest if Joel feels a rule is being violated that he report the post involved to the actual mods instead of playing vigilante mod.
                  what he said...

                  ...
                  robert

                  Comment

                  • JETEFAN
                    Senior Member
                    • Dec 2005
                    • 528

                    #10
                    Re: Another Lampson Gem!

                    Originally posted by mvandor
                    When Joel seriously asked if the poster tried to reach the unreachable Mr. Lampson, he pretty much undermined his point. I suggest if Joel feels a rule is being violated that he report the post involved to the actual mods instead of playing vigilante mod.
                    I'm sure that Lampson or Vintage Authentics can be reached, if not sooner, later. But reachable or not, that is the protocol as established by the adminisrators of this forum, contact the people in question "before" you post....it's not a "feeling" Joel has, it's the rules.

                    George

                    Comment

                    • mvandor
                      Banned
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 1032

                      #11
                      Re: Another Lampson Gem!

                      Originally posted by JETEFAN
                      I'm sure that Lampson or Vintage Authentics can be reached, if not sooner, later. But reachable or not, that is the protocol as established by the adminisrators of this forum, contact the people in question "before" you post....it's not a "feeling" Joel has, it's the rules.

                      George
                      George, can Vintage be reached? Sure. But Mr. Lampson? You must know better than that.

                      While Joel is accurate, as you are, as to the rule, I think it's his persistent obsession with playin' vigilante Sheriff here that's causing some backlash. As I said, if he wants to report a violation to the mods fine, but stop playing mod.

                      Comment

                      • JETEFAN
                        Senior Member
                        • Dec 2005
                        • 528

                        #12
                        Re: Another Lampson Gem!

                        How bout them Yankees...........

                        Comment

                        • BULBUS
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2005
                          • 1123

                          #13
                          Re: Another Lampson Gem!

                          George,

                          I don't think thats a good direction to steer this thread

                          -Chris
                          Chris

                          NY Giants, NY Yankees, Don Mattingly, Mattingly brand bats (any player)
                          sigpic
                          donnie23fan at yahoo.com

                          Comment

                          • mvandor
                            Banned
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 1032

                            #14
                            Re: Another Lampson Gem!

                            Comment

                            • Danny899
                              Senior Member
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 330

                              #15
                              Re: Another Lampson Gem!

                              Originally posted by mvandor
                              While Joel is accurate, as you are, as to the rule, I think it's his persistent obsession with playin' vigilante Sheriff here that's causing some backlash. As I said, if he wants to report a violation to the mods fine, but stop playing mod.
                              Why do you think Joel is trying to play a role of a vigilante sheriff? Because he chooses to obide by the rules of the forum? It's unfortunate that these rules are seldom enforced and many members know that, allowing them to post their opinions here before even questioning the seller. Maybe Joel is just interested in hearing the auction house's or Ebay lister's answer to their inquiry? Which is why he asks what their reply was. Don't you think that would make interesting and educational reading here? Nobody has seen every one of Griffey's gamers to say that they all had an extra length tag. It's very common, but certainly not concrete. To state otherwise would be irresponsible. I'm not indicating that you should agree with me, rather just look at it from this perspective.

                              Comment

                              Working...