Can anyone calculate how much PED's add to a palyer's stats?

[kingjammy24]

If anyone has read Canseco's 2nd book 'Vindicated' He has a very good section at the end of the book that does side by side comparisons of players when they were rookies and now. It is very much like you have done with their faces, but he did it with their whole bodies. Some of them were pretty interesting!

Todd

on the flip side, no "growing, gigantic head syndrome" here:



rudy.

[xpress34]

Coors field production was always taken with a grain of salt. We knew they weren't that good and I think the same standard should be applied to steroid users.

Sorry to go a bit OT here, but I have to address the above statement...

Yeah, you're right... that's why when Larry Walker left in 2004 and joined the Cardinals and went to the WS, he only LED the Cardinals in EVERY Offensive Category - because he wasn't that good.

Walker 04 WS line:

14 AB 5 Hits 2 2b 2 HR 2 R 3 RBI 2 BB 2 SO .357 BA

Pujols 04 WS line:

15 AB 5 Hits 2 2b 0 HR 1 R 0 RBI 1 BB 3 SO .333 BA

No one else on the cards hit above .250 for the series or had a HR and those guys got to play TWO of those games in their HOME Park where they had played 81 games of the season.

Holliday is still to be seen - he does have 4 HR and 20 RBI in 25 games - which projects to 25 / 130 away from Coors Field... BA is down due to an early slump but is rising and OBP SLG and OPS are all dowm mostly due to no other real bats in the line up - he has no real protection there.

He is the 1st Power Hitter to leave the Coors Field confines in his prime, so his next couple of years - not just this year alone - will tell alot about the 'Coors Field effect'.

And YES, I am a Rockies fan, but I am tired of hearing all the BS about Coors... the Humidor has leveled the place out and you think (like most people) that the Humidor is some kind of secret evil advantage for the Rox, let me know and I'll explain exactly what it does and why its here.

Logic dictates that ANY players stats SHOULD be skewered to his Home Park - hell, he plays 1/2 his games there!!! He should know every nuance, the batter;s eye, etc. He should be more relaxed and more comfortable hitting there than any other park... but, the pre-humidor years with shruken and hard baseballs flying out of the park made eevryone quit taking anything that is done there by a player seriously even though other parks are just as much 'band boxes'...

I mean (and this has to do with Steroid subject Barry Bonds) - AT&T Park was built FOR BARRY'S SWING so he could hit HRs there... but outside of the Steroid accusations, I didn't hear anyone claiming the AT&T factor in his surging HR totals...

Again, as always, just my .02... back to your regularly scheduled thread...

- Chris

[xpress34]

CLARIFICATION: (since we can't edit here)

Humidor statement should read 'IF you think like most people'... not simply 'You think...'

Not trying to put words in your mouth.

- Chris

[Nathan]

Thanks for telling me about the increase in Fibers from growth harmone, I hadn't known about that. I've hear players with injuries have taken it. Does it have any special curative value for injoriesl

Possibly. The problem that we have is that there hasn't really been any long-term studies done as it pertains to growth hormone; most are case studies involving patients with acromegaly as a result of a pituitary adenoma. Good examples are Andre the Giant, the actor Richard Kiel (Jaws from two James Bond movies and Mr. Larson from "Happy Gilmore"), and Tony Robbins.

[Nathan]

If anyone has read Canseco's 2nd book 'Vindicated' He has a very good section at the end of the book that does side by side comparisons of players when they were rookies and now. It is very much like you have done with their faces, but he did it with their whole bodies. Some of them were pretty interesting!

Todd

If you want to examine for excess growth hormone, it would require a year-to-year analysis of the player's fingers and toes. The reason I say this is because the body needs calcium for muscle contractions, and as a result muscle tissue can add something called the sarcoplasmic reticulum to areas of heavy use. Someone that goes through grueling lifting workouts over an extended period of time can begin to take on a different appearance. Why? Because the tendency when lifting heavy objects is to clench the jaw and contract the muscles of the face.

Where you're sitting, act like you're picking something heavy up. You can feel the muscle protruding near where the jaw attaches to the skull. You can also feel it protruding in the temples, in the cheeks, and next to the eyes. Over a period of time, enough calcium is secreted that it starts depositing and increasing the density of the bone in those areas. Whereas someone may do a strenuous arm workout (where a particular muscle is worked x amount of times, then another muscle x amount of times, and so on), the face basically gets a workout the entire time.

On the other hand, someone whose toes become like sausages from age 25 to 35....that's another story.

[Nathan]

#2 Luis Gonzalez
I don't hear his name very often, ironically I have heard him as someone that should have won a MVP over a steroid user, but to me he's a perfect example of what a user would look like. Up until his 30s, Luis was a soft hitter. He never hit more than 15 home runs. Then, he puts on muscle and has a string of 20+ home run seasons that extend into his mid 30s. Including a 57 home run season. He was able to kind of fly under the radar doing this because everyone was hitting so many home runs, but why did no one stop to ask why a soft hitting skinny kid suddenly hits 57 home runs? Compared to a hitter like McGriff (it's almost a joke now to say he was one of baseball's greatest sluggers but up until people started hitting 50 left and right he was) Luis shows a highly abnormal career arch. McGriff's peak power years were prior to his 30s and while he showed power into his late 30s it was not out of line with any of his previous production.

I'm a bit biased as I am a Braves fan so my examples are former Braves players. I watched them the most so I feel I'm more aware of their players.

Sorry to chop so much out, but this is what I wanted to address.

We don't know much about Luis Gonzalez; namely, I don't believe there's actually been a careful and intensive study done on his career. I reference another former Brave: Hank Aaron. His numbers look incredibly consistent from one year to the next over his entire career, but it's really an illusion. Milwaukee County Stadium happened to cater (slightly) to his skill set, so he started his career off with a bang. They moved to Atlanta's Launching Pad, which catered more to his skill set, so he continued to produce at the same rate as he had before. Then when he started to decline, they made the famous adjustments after the 1968 season and his numbers went right back to normal.

The reason I mention this with Luis Gonzalez is because, in the absence of being able to carefully assess what exactly the ballparks did to him or for him, we can't really say one way or another. He played a good chunk of his career in the Astrodome, which would certainly have a detrimental effect on power numbers. He spent a year in Tiger Stadium, which would have a similar effect. He then went to Arizona, which would largely have a positive impact.

For another example, look at David Ortiz. When Boston signed him on Bill James' recommendation for $700,000 a year, the logic was this. He had so much power as a pull hitter that he could hit home runs to right field in Fenway (not an easy thing to do). If he went to the opposite field, a hard fly ball would still be a home run. His power has begun to decline a bit over the last two years, so he's not hitting as hard when he pulls but his timing is still good enough that he's not consistently going opposite field.

[spagar]

You could subtract the home runs hit in his home ballparks and see how the home runs in the rest of the parks compare. Then you would be able to tell how much impact the home park had and how much PED's impacted the totals from the other parks.

I'm certainly not going to argue that PED's don't inflate statistics. But let's look at ARod's home run statistics from 96 to 03.
Seattle 96 36 home runs
Seattle 97 23 home runs
Seattle 98 42 home runs
Seattle 99 42 home runs
Seattle 00 41 home runs

Texas 01 52 home runs
Texas 02 57 home runs
Texas 03 47 home runs

ARod acknowledges using steroids in Texas. If this is accurate he was hitting an average of 42 home runs a year in Seattle from 98 through 2000 without steroids. The three years with Texas he averaged 52 home runs, 10 more a season. However Texas is without question a better home run hitters park than the one in Seattle. So a hitter going from Seatlle to Texas should hit more home runs. So how much was his home run increase due to Steroids and how much the ballpark? Is there any way you can calculate what it did for him? When you factor in the difference in the ballparks I don't see how.

[rj_lucas]

If you want to examine for excess growth hormone, it would require a year-to-year analysis of the player's fingers and toes. The reason I say this is because the body needs calcium for muscle contractions, and as a result muscle tissue can add something called the sarcoplasmic reticulum to areas of heavy use. Someone that goes through grueling lifting workouts over an extended period of time can begin to take on a different appearance. Why? Because the tendency when lifting heavy objects is to clench the jaw and contract the muscles of the face.

Where you're sitting, act like you're picking something heavy up. You can feel the muscle protruding near where the jaw attaches to the skull. You can also feel it protruding in the temples, in the cheeks, and next to the eyes. Over a period of time, enough calcium is secreted that it starts depositing and increasing the density of the bone in those areas. Whereas someone may do a strenuous arm workout (where a particular muscle is worked x amount of times, then another muscle x amount of times, and so on), the face basically gets a workout the entire time.

On the other hand, someone whose toes become like sausages from age 25 to 35....that's another story.

Very infomative post. I was going to say something similar in regards to Rudy's photo montage, but minus your knowledge of human physiology.

Comparing the heads of Ripken and Alomar's to those of McGwire and Bonds is simply not valid. The intense conditioning regimens of contemporary power hitters (including McGwire and Bonds) are well documented.

Putting aside for a moment the question of who used and who didn't, that level of conditioning will change the size of your neck and head, period.

Rick
rickjlucas@gmail.com