Saints dureen on EBAY

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • norristrophy
    Member
    • Feb 2006
    • 77

    Saints dureen on EBAY



    Being a Saints fan I would love a dureen Saints, especially one of Abramowicz obviously, but I do not know much about football gamers. I have been looking at lots of old photos lately and I have my doubts about this auction. Since I have not been able to get any questions answered by B&E I decided to post here my concerns.

    1. I have not been able to find any pics of the Saints wearing this style of numbering during Abramowicz's playing days.

    2. I have found evidence of them using this style of numbering in the mid 70's. James Kearney also wore #46 in 1976.

    3. I have not found any evidence of the Saints using this style of skinny lettering on the NOB.

    4. B&E has not responded to my questions as to the amount (if any) of wear on the jersey.

    5. Since the hem has been cut and any tags are now gone I cannot use that evidence to help date the shirt.

    I know people on here have had positive experiences with B&E but they simply do not respond to questions through EBAY so I was wondering if any football experts on the forum can lend a hand as this would be one of my ultimate jerseys if really an Abramowicz from the late 60's.

    Thanks
  • Eric
    Senior Member
    • Jan 1970
    • 2848

    #2
    Re: Saints dureen on EBAY

    I sent an email to B&E- they have normally answered questions at
    collect@bestweb.net or becollectibles.inc@verizon.net
    Eric
    Always looking for game used San Diego Chargers items...

    Comment

    • nyg44
      Junior Member
      • Dec 2005
      • 14

      #3
      Re: Saints dureen on EBAY

      First of all, It cannot be a late 60s jersey. The NFL went to names on the backs in 1970. So, start from 1970 on to see if you can locate any photos.

      Comment

      • norristrophy
        Member
        • Feb 2006
        • 77

        #4
        Re: Saints dureen on EBAY

        Judging by what it went for it probably was not what it was advertised as. B&E never responded either.

        Comment

        Working...