Which Game Used Bat Would You Choose? - Need Your Opinion

[3arod13]

Which would you choose?

Both from 2008. One is cracked and shows tremendous use. The other is uncracked and show pretty good use.

Would appreciate your opinion.

Regards, Tony

[BULBUS]

I like the top one. Great use, the crack seems to be on the opposite side of the labeling and will display nicely.

I don't like how on the other bat the inscription runs over the bat labeling. Arod really needs to start more to the left when he is adding those long inscriptions.

[Gameusedfan1]

The bottom one, I personal dont trust alex rodriguez-13, and MLB is a plus.

[Rob L]

I'd go with the top one. Great use.

[emann]

I'd pick the bottom one due to being uncracked and having the MLB cert, but that placement of inscription throws it off a little.

[Why would he write over the signature stamping?]

[suave1477]

The bottom one, I personal dont trust alex rodriguez-13, and MLB is a plus.

If you don't mind me asking I am just curious what you don't trust about him?

[sportscentury]

If you don't mind me asking I am just curious what you don't trust about him?

You haven't read any of the recent threads about his items? I thought you posted in some of them.

[yanks12025]

I would take the top one.

Also when will we be hearing about your A-rod homerun bat.

[suave1477]

You haven't read any of the recent threads about his items? I thought you posted in some of them.

Sportscentury I have read the past threads and I have yet to see anyone here with any real concrete evidence to anything really questionable.

FOR EXAMPLE
Someone here questioned a Pudge Rodriguez Game Used Bat MLB Authenticated. because the handle had taping on it.

That to me does not make the seller questionable.
1) First of all the bat itself is MLB Authenticated
2) Pudge in his earlier years has taped his handles as someone else pointed out
3) Me personally has not watched every game that Pudge played in as a Tiger, so you never know maybe he did tape the handle for one game or one at bat. Anything is possible!!
4) If someone is suggesting that the seller added tape to the handle to make the bat looked more used. I think that is far fetched, because why would you add tape to a handle that is not normal for Pudges use charecteristics???

Ok so lets say MLB Screwed up and a teammate used the bat instead of Pudge and MLB just marked it as a Pudge game used bat.

Then that is not the sellers fault, that is MLB's fault.

The seller is most likely taking the MLB Hologram for face value and selling it as is.
Could he himself do more homework on the use of the bat SURE OF COURSE But in the long run you can't hold him responsible when he is not the authenticator.

Which boils down to this You can blame MLB and as always do your own homework!!!

Again if you read the sellers listings most descriptions you can see he does show he tries to be honest as possible - by letting you know he is selling a bat "which shows light use" - so he considers it "Game Issued"

If it shows light use he can easily say it is a Game Used bat, but he doesn't he lets you know he is considering it Game Issued.

As far as the Griffey Jersey he was completely honest about it saying it was Game Issued / pro Cut - he made mention of it several times in bold.

So its not like he is trying to get over on anyone and he states he is selling it as is.

I don't mean to hijack a thread but since the item in question has also the seller being questioned I just want to fully understand why???

Yet I myself am wondering with all the questioning of the seller am wondering if anyone has reached out to him / contacted him about what they are questioning??? (I dont mean questioning of which bat to choose but the seller himself is being questioned)

I have, and felt comfortable with his answers!!!

[3arod13]

The bottom one, I personal dont trust alex rodriguez-13, and MLB is a plus.

MLB Authentication is for the signature only. Not game used.