MLB auctions $1000 mistake??

[suicide_squeeze]

Bobby,

It is definately a mistake that needs to be addressed. If in fact the only discrepancy is that there was more than one set of gear worn (which unless planned, seems unlikely), then that should be stated in the auction.

Man......with MLB making mistakes too, we're going to always need to be on our toes. This is really starting to get serious. Personally, I expect it from the auction houses, but MLB???

Nothing on the camoflague print matches. These are absolutely two different sets of gear.


Good catch, Bobby.

[rj_lucas]

Man......with MLB making mistakes too, we're going to always need to be on our toes. This is really starting to get serious. Personally, I expect it from the auction houses, but MLB???

Just to clarify, this is a Red Sox auction, not an MLB auction. There is no reference to an MLB holo in the listing. I have seen numerous mistakes or misrepresentations of team-listed items. Buyer beware.

Rick
rickjlucas@gmail.com

[gamer35]

Bobby,

It is definately a mistake that needs to be addressed. If in fact the only discrepancy is that there was more than one set of gear worn (which unless planned, seems unlikely), then that should be stated in the auction.

Man......with MLB making mistakes too, we're going to always need to be on our toes. This is really starting to get serious. Personally, I expect it from the auction houses, but MLB???

Nothing on the camoflague print matches. These are absolutely two different sets of gear.


Good catch, Bobby.

Before you start underlining and bolding statements about a "definite" mistake, wouldnt you first watch the entire game to be DEFINITELY sure that this is the case? I recall this year that Varitek wore two sets of catching gear for Mother's Day, so MAYBE it could have been the same sitaution again this year.