Results 1 to 5 of 5
Thread: Met Mystery #66
-
09-06-2009, 07:39 PM #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 1,501
Met Mystery #66
What goes on here? Casey or Yogi would say it better. Yet another seemingly genuine piece of Met equipment assigned a cock-eyed number. Lets leave the e-bay seller out of this because the piece is real the number is not. Submitted for your approval:
Pete Schourek wore #48 for the Mets from 1991-1993 so why #66?
-
09-06-2009, 09:30 PM #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Posts
- 2,234
Re: Met Mystery #66
In the 1990 Street & Smith issue, he is listed on the Mets roster although no number is assigned to him....Could it be from 1990 ST?
-
09-06-2009, 10:38 PM #3Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 1,501
Re: Met Mystery #66
Could be, there's really no other explanation. I had forgotten that Pete was the Cy Young runner-up in 1995 to Greg Maddux. Funny,66 is also the amount of wins he has in the majors.
-
09-11-2009, 06:13 PM #4Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 1,501
Re: Met Mystery #66
Met Mystery solved. Pete wore #66 in spring training.
See you all next week for another edition of Met Mystery. So long for now.
-
09-11-2009, 06:16 PM #5Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 1,501
Re: Met Mystery #66
Ironmanfan on the money.
Reply With Quote
