Hello & Welcome to our community. Is this your first visit? Register
Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 79
  1. #1

    O/T: H&B liable for player's death

    http://www.helenair.com/news/article...cc4c03286.html

    I feel bad this family lost their son, and I've never been a fan of aluminum bats. But, to suggest H&B should pay the family almost $800K for "failing to warn users of the danger of its aluminum bats and that this failure caused the accident" -- that's idiotic. Is there anyone who was involved in baseball in 2003 who didn't know aluminum bats were more dangerous than wood bats? And look at that wording: the "failure to warn... CAUSED the accident." This is a sad story that keeps getting sadder.

  2. #2
    Senior Member kylehess10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,006

    Re: O/T: H&B liable for player's death

    This is ridiculous. I'm surprised they didn't sue Rawlings as well for making baseballs "too hard". Accidents happen.


    I loved this quote though:

    "All teams should use wooden bats, the way professional players do, Debbie Patch added."


    Maybe she should try playing with wooden bats. They just aren't the same. I just finished my first season in a wooden bat league and they are MUCH harder to use. I had my fair share of hits but there is a big difference in distance. I don't believe little leagues should ever use wooden bats. Those little kids wouldn't be able to handle it. It should stay in the 18+ leagues (as well as professional leagues too ofcoarse).

  3. #3
    Senior Member staindsox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    726

    Re: O/T: H&B liable for player's death

    I completely agree with you. One of my best friends played college ball and was almost killed (exact same accident). He had to have emergency surgery to save his life...he didn't sue Easton or H&B. It would actually have made more sense to sue the league since they were the ones to determine which bats were acceptable...not just aluminum vs. wood, but also the weight to length ratios. I doubt the league has the deep pockets H&B does, so...how is this not about money??? He could have been killed with a wooden bat too, so blaming the manufacturer for something like this is pretty stupid. I can't believe a jury bought this.

    Chris
    Always looking for Jack Hannahan or St. Paul Saints gamers:

    www.jackhannahan.webs.com

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    936

    Re: O/T: H&B liable for player's death

    I agree, this is a bad verdict. Why not sue because a soft rubber ball wasn't used. I hope H&B can appeal the verdict. You feel very sorry for parents whose son is killed, that is tragic. But I don't feel sympathy for people who can't or won't accept that accidents happen and/or just try to milk a tragedy for money.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    102

    Re: O/T: H&B liable for player's death

    These things pass b/c jurys have a large ratio of stupid people on them. That's why so many weird outcomes in court occur. Most people are idiots in the world. That's why a coffee cup says, caution may be hot, why alcohol warns of its ability in impair, and guns come w/ warnings may be dangerous. B/c the world is filled w/ mostly stupid people. We cater to the stupid, rather than attempt to elevate to the more intelligent. This is why I hate jury duty. Watching some mouth breather trying to figure out the complex statements offered in court, b/c obviously folks don't get the simple ones. Such as, hot coffee may burn, a sport where you hit a 100mph ball w/ a metal rod may be dangerous, and why drinking and driving might cause problems. instead, we blame Mcdonalds, a bat company, and the bar that served the idiot the beer.

    But things will get better, right?

    Kyle, do you live in ftw? They have wood bat leagues here? I've seen the ft cats stuff you mentioned once.

  6. #6
    Senior Member BMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,374

    Re: O/T: H&B liable for player's death

    I've spent the past two weeks in Helena, Montana. I must say it is something I never want to do again. I truly feel for the Patch family, their loss is something I cannot ever imagine nor do I ever want to go through it. I hope this judgment will give them some closure.

    On a related note, since July 25, 2003 there have been three other players killed in baseball. One by a ball tossed that hit him in the chest and the other two were killed by balls batted from wooden bats. I'm now waiting for those lawsuits because of a "failure to warn".
    Brian Hillerich

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    102

    Re: O/T: H&B liable for player's death

    I hope my previous rant wasn't taken out of the fact, I do feel for the family. But blaming a bat company for its bats being dangerous is silly. Its too bad folks can't see that, i.e. the jury. Hit a ball with anything can potentially cause a dangerous outcome. Why not make pitchers wear batting helmets. Just hopefully not the bobblehead style ones offered by rawlings.

    But, Lousiville has the money and people will chase. I played in a league that wanted the aluminum bats, that while that did hit a speedy ball, they dont shatter and randomly leave large chunks or sharp chards raining down on players...

    Wasn't it a wooden bat that hit a ball that killed the poor coach in the minors a few years ago?

  8. #8
    Senior Member CampWest's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,443

    Re: O/T: H&B liable for player's death

    Why do people not hold themselves personally responsible for their own well being? Especially when participating in potentially dangerous activities...

    Ya know, I went skydiving once... And I never saw a warning on the parachute that said "If this fails to open, you may be injured - possibly fatally". Perhaps I should consider a lawsuit since there was not proper warning. My common sense was not astute enough for me to discern the dangers without that written warning. [/ end sarcasm]
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Wes Campbell

  9. #9
    Senior Member CampWest's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,443

    Re: O/T: H&B liable for player's death

    I was just thinking... Didnt Smith & Wesson have a lawsuit dismissed on grounds of frivolous nature??? As I recall they had gotten sued because, guess what, bullets are dangerous. But the funny part is they dont make bullets. They just make guns that shoot bullets. Apparently they were sued because the handgun did not have sufficient warning that injury and death could result from firing a bullet from it.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Wes Campbell

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,439

    Re: O/T: H&B liable for player's death

    Most have already stated the obvious, but BRIAN.....My man......you MUST appeal this verdict. This is absolutely assinine.

    Nomo is correct....the average person is an imbecile anymore. Until they have someone fill their ears with "SUE THEM!" Then, all of a sudden, they become real smart.

    I am going to part with you all on the feeling sorry for the family because their son died. I am not going to be politically correct and tell you that it's horrible and I just can't imagine how their lives must be now. My feelings for them left immediately after reading they sued the bat manufacturer. They appear to be a family of s#!tty character, and the kind that is bringing our country to it's knees. Why must everyone in the world be "paid" for a tragic accicent when they lose a loved one.....a family member......when it's obviously no fault of anyones? Accidents happen.....if you don't want to take risks, don't reproduce. Don't participate in anything in life. Just stay home, lock the doors, and minimize your exposure to danger.......like walking out your front door, ever.

    Or.....live a life, and hope for the best.

    Did Nick Buoniconti (I know I spelled his name wrong) sue the college his son was playing for when his son broke his neck playing football, paralysing him for life?

    Juries are righteous in principle......right up until you are seated next to three "Jethro's" and a "Wilma". Freakin idiots. Look no further than the O.J. trial to illustrate that point.

    Sorry for venting, but this type of lawsuit, as tragic and sad as the event was that led to it, is simply wrong.

    APPEAL it.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:14 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.
vBulletin Skin By: PurevB.com