Hello & Welcome to our community. Is this your first visit? Register
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: size 48

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    590

    size 48

    seems to me size 48 is the smallest size jersey worn today.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    550

    Re: size 48

    In what sport? I have several Reds game worn jerseys that are 46's and some Rams game worn jerseys that are 44's.

  3. #3

    Re: size 48

    Definitely some size 46 out there like Alfonso Soriano and I think Soriano has worn some 44 too.

    There are plenty of Cornerbacks in the NFL that wear size 42 as I have some Darrell Green jerseys that confirm that (although he is now retired).

    I would agree that size 48 seems to be the most popular size in baseball.
    Regards,
    Andrew Lang
    AllstarsPlus@aol.com
    202-716-8500

  4. #4
    Senior Member 34swtns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,120

    Re: size 48

    The Ronde Barber jersey I just got is a size 40.

  5. #5
    Moderator TNTtoys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,366

    Re: size 48

    This really depends upon which sport you're talking about. For example, if you take baseball and football jerseys...

    Football: You tend to see smaller sizes because players wear their jerseys 'skin tight' so that the opposition has nothing to grab onto. I have seen a fair few big guys squeezing into 42s through 46s.

    Baseball: Players like to wear these a little bit more baggy, so it's likely you will see more 48s and 50s. Larger players wear 52s (some even bigger). You would also see some 44s and 46s but they are fewer these days than the 48s+

    And from what I have seen (though I am no expert), hockey jerseys tend to run very large. Size 52+ seems to be common. Any hockey experts care to shine light on why such large sizes are preferred?
    Looking for ...
    Any Game Used Mets jerseys from 1986 and 1987
    Any Keith Hernandez, Ron Darling, Lee Mazzilli and John Olerud Mets items
    Email me at TNT_Toys@yahoo.com

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    550

    Re: size 48

    Quote Originally Posted by TNTtoys View Post
    And from what I have seen (though I am no expert), hockey jerseys tend to run very large. Size 52+ seems to be common. Any hockey experts care to shine light on why such large sizes are preferred?
    Size 52 in modern hockey jerseys is pretty much unheard of these days. They were fairly common throughout the 80's and 90's but not anymore. Today you will be lucky to find 54's and the vast majority of current NHL hockey jerseys are 56, 58 and some 60's.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,537

    Re: size 48

    Warrick Dunn wore a 38!

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,901

    Re: size 48

    Speaking for the three major leagues, currently MLB has a handful of players taking 42s and a few more taking 44s, but I would agree that 48 is a pretty normal size these days.

    Of course, sizing was figured differently in the "good old days". In the 1960s, players such as Hank Aaron, Ernie Banks and Billy Williams were often outfitted in size 40 flannels. One of Don Drysdale's last jerseys (1969 Dodgers) was a 46, which today is considered slightly diminutive by MLB standards.

    Warrick Dunn at a 38 is the smallest that I can remember offhand in the current NFL. The tailoring done to make the jerseys skin tight makes comparisons more difficult, as the era of Jim Brown, Gale Sayers and Dick Butkus didn't feature lineman's cuts, skill position cuts, and the like on a regular basis like we have today.

    Many older (1950s/60s) NBA jerseys were 38s and 40s, with untagged extra length. These days, I have seen a few 44s (Allan Iverson comes to mind, and he took a 42 pre-Reebok). Today's NBA players, for the most part, like loose fitting unies, unlike throwback John Stockton, who wore 40s and 42s during his illustrious career.

    It's my own arbitrary figure, but I consider the late 1980s/1990 to be the turning point for sizes ballooning up.

    Dave M.
    Chicago area

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.
vBulletin Skin By: PurevB.com