Results 1 to 8 of 8
Hybrid View
-
08-23-2010, 01:32 PM #1
Which Manny bat auction is more embarassing to the hobby?
-
08-23-2010, 05:19 PM #2
Re: Which Manny bat auction is more embarassing to the hobby?
My vote goes to the second one. The auction itself is horrendous. The phrasing is really odd, almost makes you think it isn't coming from Massachusetts.
Ricardo Montoya
ri.montoya at yahoo dot com
-
08-23-2010, 05:27 PM #3
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 773
Re: Which Manny bat auction is more embarassing to the hobby?
The phrasing is really odd, almost makes you think it isn't coming from Massachusetts
I'm confused by this statement........
-
08-23-2010, 05:44 PM #4
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 835
Re: Which Manny bat auction is more embarassing to the hobby?
- CINCINNATI REDS/JOEY VOTTO BATS
Email: rdeversole@gmail.com Twitter: @dugoutrelics
-
08-23-2010, 07:13 PM #5
Re: Which Manny bat auction is more embarassing to the hobby?
I meant that the poor English makes it sound like one of those people from China trying to sell you the "100% authentic Rolex" for $59.99.
Ricardo Montoya
ri.montoya at yahoo dot com
-
08-23-2010, 07:33 PM #6
Re: Which Manny bat auction is more embarassing to the hobby?
Clearly it is the 2006 World Series listing that is the worst. I mean it would be suspect enough that a February made bat be used in the Series, but it is just obvious they have a bat they want to get max value for. How can they get max value? List it as a bat he used in a World series he didn't play in. That makes it one of a kind! Now that is Manny being "many"
-
08-25-2010, 09:43 PM #7
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Posts
- 9
-
08-23-2010, 09:11 PM #8
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 4,256