Grey Flannel Carlton Jersey

[hblakewolf]

Forum readers-

Last year, Hunt Auctions offered a 1977 Phillies Carlton road jersey in their auction. It was described as all original. A fellow Forum reader won it and sent it to me for my inspection. Although not noted in the original description, there was a faint outline of another name written in the collar next to the original chain-stitched CARLTON. Likewise, the nameplate on back was not original. It appeared as though someone had tried to take various letters from several road nameplates, and make the name CARLTON. As a result, the C and A were not correctly angled. It should be noted that the Phillies were known to send their game jerseys down to their various minor league teams for additional use. Once discovered, the buyer contacted David Hunt and the folks at MEARS with these issues. As per the MEARS guidelines, a full refund was made to the buyer. The jersey was then relisted in the next Hunts auction, with these issues clearly noted.

I have been contacted by two Forum Readers about my thoughts on the 1977 Carlton jersey in the current Grey Flannel auction. It appears to be the same jersey (can't see the NIC), based upon the year/set and also the inconsistencies with the name plate. I have contacted the folks at Grey Flannel, and informed them of not only the history with this jersey, but also the fact that this jersey was sold at Hunts with the problems noted. Their listing makes no mention of these issues, and identifies the jersey as all original. As of this post, I have not heard back.

I have already been part of one Forum reader’s heartache with this jersey, and I would hate to have this happen again. Although it is a real Carlton Phillies jersey, it does have alterations that should be made aware to any potential buyer. If you have any questions on this or any Phillies jersey, please let me know.

Howard Wolf
hblakewolf@patmedia.net

Here is the Grey Flannel listing:








1977 Steve Carlton Philadelphia Phillies Game-Used Road Jersey
Lot # 220

Known simply as "Lefty," Steve Carlton was one of the most successful pitchers in the modern era. In his 23-year career he recorded six 20-win seasons. He was the league leader in wins five times, led in ERA in 1972, and led in strikeouts five seasons. Carlton was named to the All-Star team ten times, and was the first pitcher to win four Cy Young Awards. He also had a 3.22 lifetime ERA to go with his 329 wins. On the left front tail of this blue road zippered front jersey is the "Wilson" manufacturer's size 46 tag. Below that is a striptag with "77 2" embroidered on it. On the inside back collar is a striptag with "Carlton" embroidered on it. On the left breast of the jersey is the Phillies "P" logo. On the right breast and on the back is the player number "32." Across the back is "CARLTON" on a blue nameplate. All lettering and numbering is done in burgundy on white tackle twill. The jersey shows nice game-use and appears to have no alterations of any kind.
Reserve Price: $1,000

Current Bid: $0

Current Time: August 07, 2006 04:22:09 PM

[sportscentury]

Hi, Howard:

I contacted Grey Flannel about this immediately after I saw it. Richie Russek got back to me last night saying that he would recheck it and correct the problem. I'm not sure if the consignor (who was presumably the winner of this jersey when it was re-auctioned at Hunts) was forthcoming about the problems with the nameplate when he consigned it to GFC (that is, I don't know what was said between the consignor and GFC when the jersey was consigned).

Best,
Reid

[trsent]

Let me see if I can reiterate the patter here.

Reid emails Grey Flannel and receives a reply.

Howard emails Grey Flannel and doesn't receive a reply.

Howard, Reid is your friend, if you have problems you should have Reid contact them over it as I have told you time and time again, your emails are not read or addressed with Grey Flannel at this time due to personal issues between you and The Boss.

Oh but wait, you know your emails will not be addressed and you like being able to post on this forum any issues you have knowing your emails will not be addressed.

This continuing discussion from thread to thread reminds me of a REM song, one of my favorites:

Pop Song 89 by R.E.M.

Hello, I saw you, I know you, I knew you
I think I can remember your name...name
Hello I’m sorry, I lost myself
I think I thought you were someone else

Should we talk about the weather? (Hi...hi, hi)
Should we talk about the government? (Hi...hi, hi, hi)

Hello, how are you? I know you, I knew you
I think I can remember your name...name
Hello, I’m sorry I lost myself
I think I thought you were someone else

Should we talk about the weather? (Hi...hi, hi)
Should we talk about the government? (Hi...hi, hi, hi)

Hello my friend, are you visible today?
You know I never knew that it could be so strange...strange
Hello, I’m sorry, I lost myself
I think I thought you were someone else

Should we talk about the weather? (Hi...hi, hi)
Should we talk about the government? (Hi...hi, hi, hi)

[sportscentury]

Joel,

Are you trying to irritate me? If Howard contacted Grey Flannel and did not get a response, what more can he do? I'm not his gopher, nor does he expect me to be. You made an offer to Howard to contact Grey Flannel for him. I did not make such an offer, nor am I interested in doing so. Can you blame him for not taking you up on your offer, given your recent ridiculous exchanges on the forum?

Please leave me out of your squabble with Howard. After the utter insanity with the other forum member a couple of weeks back, I refuse to be involved in this kind of thing (my head is still spinning from my brief and unpleasant visit to bizarro world). Howard and you are both my friends, but please leave me out of whatever is going on between you two.

With that said, Richie got back to me in a very timely fashion (I emailed him on a Sunday and he got back to me the same day). He said he'd look into it and resolve the issue. I trust his word that he will.

Reid

[b.heagy]

Let me see if I can reiterate the patter here.

Reid emails Grey Flannel and receives a reply.

Howard emails Grey Flannel and doesn't receive a reply.

Howard, Reid is your friend, if you have problems you should have Reid contact them over it as I have told you time and time again, your emails are not read or addressed with Grey Flannel at this time due to personal issues between you and The Boss.

Oh but wait, you know your emails will not be addressed and you like being able to post on this forum any issues you have knowing your emails will not be addressed.

This continuing discussion from thread to thread reminds me of a REM song, one of my favorites:

Pop Song 89 by R.E.M.

Hello, I saw you, I know you, I knew you
I think I can remember your name...name
Hello I’m sorry, I lost myself
I think I thought you were someone else

Should we talk about the weather? (Hi...hi, hi)
Should we talk about the government? (Hi...hi, hi, hi)

Hello, how are you? I know you, I knew you
I think I can remember your name...name
Hello, I’m sorry I lost myself
I think I thought you were someone else

Should we talk about the weather? (Hi...hi, hi)
Should we talk about the government? (Hi...hi, hi, hi)

Hello my friend, are you visible today?
You know I never knew that it could be so strange...strange
Hello, I’m sorry, I lost myself
I think I thought you were someone else

Should we talk about the weather? (Hi...hi, hi)
Should we talk about the government? (Hi...hi, hi, hi)

Howard is simply following the rules of this forum. You pointed this out in a previous thread about a Yaz bat. I have found Howard's posts on many items very interesting and informative as I am sure many others have. I say - THANK YOU HOWARD FOR BRINGING QUESTIONABLE ITEMS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE FORUM.

[trsent]

Ok, so Howard knows he will not have his emails to Grey Flannel read, but he continues to email them.

Why? So he can pick on them on this forum knowing they will not respond but he likes to pick on them.

Maybe Howard needs to find a way to make peace with Grey Flannel (good luck dealing with that big head) but he is following the forum rules to a T, but he knows he will never receive a response to his inquiry so he is just putting Grey Flannel up for show every time he does it because he doesn't like how he has been treated by the company in the past.

Oh well, next?

I applaud Howard's efforts to find questions about items. I just don't like that he wastes his time emailing them the issues knowing that his emails are generally not read over there due to his past problems with the head of the company.

I have no finical gain in this debate, but when will Howard take a step forward to work with the company (even if it means through a liaison) to help the industry instead of picking on one targeted seller?

[b.heagy]

Forgive me Joel if I am missing something. In Howards original post (from this thread) There are positive points such as Hunt Auctions re-selling the item with the correct info and MEARS refunding the winning bidders money. 2 Very positive points - good for the hobby. I see no negativity to Grey Flannel. I am still new to this forum so I do not know the history between the two of you or with Grey Flannel. So the item in question happens to be offered by Grey Flannel but was originally offered by Hunt. I dont see negative in this. Only a positive thread making potential bidders aware that there are issues with the item. If I would be interested in purchasing this piece I would be grateful to know what I was buying before I found out too late.

[hblakewolf]

Joel-I echo exactly the same feeling as Reid. I'm not sure why you feel compelled to be involved with my personal dealings and in particular, my communication with Grey Flannel.

As a 20+ year uniform collector specializing in Phillies equipment, I receive quite a few emails each week seeking my advice and insight on various jerseys and Philadelphia items. In this particular case, I have seen the jersey in question and know quite a bit about the problems associated with it. Grey Flannel indicates that the shirt “appears to have no alterations of any kind”, however, this is simply rubbish. I have given Grey Flannel a fair opportunity to provide insight on this jersey BEFORE I came onto the Forum with my post. Over 24 hours have passed without a response. A fellow Forum reader paid over $7,000 for this exact shirt with Hunts last year, and later discovered it had the described problems. The collector was able to obtain a complete refund, as it had a MEARS LOA and as such, they guarantee the authenticity or your money back. Per Grey Flannels printed information for this auction, “Return Policy- ALL LOTS ARE SOLD AS IS. ALL SALES ARE FINAL. NO RETURNS. Each and every lot in this auction has been viewed by a minimum of two hobby experts.” Some experts!

Any auction house must be accountable for the items they offer and be willing to address issues BEFORE collectors place a bid on a NON REFUNDABLE ITEM. Should a collector win this Carlton jersey and later discover these problems, what recourse is there? I have had similar questions about Phillies items with some of the biggest auction houses including Vintage Authentics and most recently Lelands, and receive feedback most often the same day. I just questioned a Pete Rose jacket here on the Forum offered by Lelands, and Mike Heffner not only responded, but also indicated he would investigate and take corrective actions if necessary.

Joel, let me be very clear with you. I have NEVER sought your assistance or desire your involvement with my business in any capacity, shape or form, nor do I desire to communicate with you today, tomorrow, or next week. I'm sure other Forum readers find your off the wall rants amusing, however, your asinine behavior has worn extremely thin with me.

Howard Wolf
hblakewolf@patmedia.net

Joel,

Are you trying to irritate me? If Howard contacted Grey Flannel and did not get a response, what more can he do? I'm not his gopher, nor does he expect me to be. You made an offer to Howard to contact Grey Flannel for him. I did not make such an offer, nor am I interested in doing so. Can you blame him for not taking you up on your offer, given your recent ridiculous exchanges on the forum?

Please leave me out of your squabble with Howard. After the utter insanity with the other forum member a couple of weeks back, I refuse to be involved in this kind of thing (my head is still spinning from my brief and unpleasant visit to bizarro world). Howard and you are both my friends, but please leave me out of whatever is going on between you two.

With that said, Richie got back to me in a very timely fashion (I emailed him on a Sunday and he got back to me the same day). He said he'd look into it and resolve the issue. I trust his word that he will.

Reid

[b.heagy]

Given past history good or bad. Emails should be read and responded to (in my opinion). If there are good points and valid information then I believe that should be taken into consideration. If emails are sent to the company in hopes of pointing something out that may have been missed - then that is trying to help/work with the company. If there is no correction and the item sells and is found out later not be what it was presented to be then it is the auction company that gets the bad rap or has the headache.

[Number9]

Hi Howard,
Great info, thanks.
A question, if you dont mind. When you saw the jersey, how obvious was the nameplate restoration on back, as far as old stitch lines etc?
It concerns me as a potential Grey Flannel bidder that they would not notice this. No matter how many lots you have, I would think you would hold each jersey up to the light and check for restorations/changes before you list them as all-original. Is it obvious on this jersey, or perhaps not at all and therefore understandable that they did not catch it?
Thanks.

Mike