View Poll Results: What is a good move or bad move on Palmerio's part?
- Voters
- 15. You may not vote on this poll
-
Good Move
2 13.33% -
Bad Move
13 86.67%
Results 21 to 29 of 29
-
01-03-2011, 01:08 PM #21
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Posts
- 119
Re: Palmeiro still insists he never used steroids
Jim, All excellent points, I agree MLB should have done a better job. I am honestly not sure what Palmeiro could have done, but after the positive test and once the season ended, he disappeared off the face of the earth. If he was in fact innocent, then he should have gone to whatever lengths were necessary to attempt to clear his name including demanding to be retested or have the B sample tested or whatever he needed to do.
While everyone responds to adversity differently, crawing under a rock and disappearing did little to help clear his name. We literally have heard from him about two or three times all via phone interview over the past five years. Nobody seems to know where the guy is at. I guess at the end of the day, that is why many people just assume that he is guilty as charged in addition to the positive test.
-
01-03-2011, 04:26 PM #22
-
01-05-2011, 05:54 PM #23
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 377
Re: Palmeiro still insists he never used steroids
Well the votes are in and he received 11% of the vote. I thought it would be slightly higher myself (closer to 15%), but I knew it would be low.
It will be interesting to see how Clemens and Bonds do when there up in a few years. I figured it would be 40-50% prior to this vote. Now I would think closer to 30% for each of them on the first try.
Chris
-
01-07-2011, 09:17 AM #24
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 1,974
Re: Palmeiro still insists he never used steroids
I feel the Sports Writers should be in charge of airport security. Since they can "profile" athletes as "users" without any real evidence, perhaps they can take those talents and make it easier for all of us at the airports.
Just an opinion,
Jim
flaa1a@comcast.net
-
01-07-2011, 02:22 PM #25
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 23
Re: Palmeiro still insists he never used steroids
Will Clark never put up the numbers that Palmeiro did, but in my eyes he's the true HOF'er. Although he didn't have the numbers to get into the Hall, he left baseball at the top of his game to spend more time with family. What does that say about the man? I know that this post is about Palmeiro, but I think the Hall should consider "character" as part of their voting process. As one member mentioned, Palmeiro is a jack-ass. From my 2 encounters with Will, he's been nothing but a class act.
Clark put it best when he was commenting on Palmeiro's positive drug test:
"You got caught partner!"
-
01-07-2011, 02:33 PM #26
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 287
Re: Palmeiro still insists he never used steroids
Its funny how the sportswriters think they are God. The majority of them have never picked up a bat in their life. I think the Hall of Fame is a joke that Rose is not in. So the "hit king", Home run king Bonds/ AROD, and one of the best pitchers Clemens , catchers Piazza /Rodriguez , never will be in the Hall. The Hall of Fame will be a big joke. There are a lot of players in already who broke the law, did drugs, and other immoral things. The fact that the media is constantly on these athletes of today that there are more things out in the public. Do you think there are athletes in the football hall of fame that used?
-
01-07-2011, 04:47 PM #27
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Posts
- 8,901
-
01-07-2011, 04:51 PM #28
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Posts
- 623
Re: Palmeiro still insists he never used steroids
The voting system is way off, but that is why it is called the National Baseball Hall Of Fame. I believe the HOFers, and a "Past Players committee" should be put together at random and vote on the top players per year. Each committee should be changed per year so there are no biase voters. I dont believe the Baseball Writers Association, however, should be taken out of the voting picture all together. I believe 50% of the vote should be the Baseball Writers, and a split 25%-25% should be the HOFers, and "Past Players Committee". This would insure players that deserve to be in the HOF would not be ignored because of Writers with "chips" on their shoulder.
-
01-07-2011, 06:27 PM #29
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Posts
- 150