How do you decide Between a Rack of Your Team's Game Used Jerseys?

[frikativ54]

This question is inspired from a conversation with a fellow collector. Say you run into a rack of certified game used jerseys directly from your favorite team, mine being the Houston Astros. With limited means and only able to buy a few, how do you decide which to buy?

Do you go for style first? If there were an old-style shooting star jersey, would you buy it, even if it's a common player? Or even if there's not much use? Or if the team had a rack of jerseys, would you go for the alternate style because you like the color? Or a year with a desirable patch?

Or are you a player-first collector? If there's a Bagwell jersey, my favorite player, does the style not matter so much as who wore it? Or even how used it is? Again, we are assuming that there are no questions about authenticity of the various jerseys, as they are put out by the team itself, say the Astros.

Or do you consider yourself a use-first collector? If you see a tattered jersey of Astros reserve, Jason Michaels, would you buy it just for the many loose threads, the piling, the puckering, etc. This kind of collector would love the photomatch, even if it's not a star player or a favorite style.

Or are you some combination of these? I'll share my thoughts later, but I'm most of all curious to read your responses.

[WadeInBmore]

I am a player first type of collector. Use and style are sort of in a second place tie for me. Some styles are used only once (or twice) so the use would be minimal. However, if I like the style that could be motivation enough.

Now when I go by my principal response of player first it makes the other decisions easier too. If multiple jerseys are available, then use becomes a major role. That being said, understanding the rarity of unique jersey makes it more appealing as well. If the piece is MLB authenticated to a specific game and I know what the player did that game...that could also help suade me (but you could consider that "use").

wade

[frikativ54]

For me, personally, it's player first. I will take a light or moderate use Bagwell item over a destroyed Adam Everett gamer any day. However, if there are multiple jerseys of a player I collect, I will go for use over style.

I would rather have one of Jeff's jerseys of a less desirable style if it's pounded with use. For example, I would take a road gray over a home pinstripe if it shows more wear. If I had my choice, it would be a pounded Bagwell, no matter what patch is on the sleeve.

Then, lastly, I go for style. Ceteris paribus, I would take a red alternate over a home pinstripe Bagwell. There are a few times where I'm looking for a jersey with a particular patch, but I can't get excited about that jersey unless it's of a player whose shirt means a lot to me and is well-worn.

[flaco1801]

lately i would think that some would take a "sniff" test to determine the best one...

[godwulf]

Nice problem to have...or fantasize about!

Player first, for sure. There are players from whom I'd prefer to have a game-worn t-shirt than the home white jersey of a player that I don't care all that much about.

[jppopma]

For me, it's player first. If one of the players I collect didn't play for the team, then I go for style (or specially patched jerseys).

I would add price next since I do have to work within a family friendly budget.

Use is one of those in the background issues. There would have to be specific photomatch wear for it to factor into the decision. When looking at racks, most seem to have similar wear (other than the few way to crisp ones).