Mlb.com Authentication Issues And Concerns

[3arod13]

I searched GUU trying to find all threads where people had issues or concerns when trying to verify their item on MLB.COM, and also about their authentication process. Curious as to what types issues people have had, and has anyone contacted them via their email (authentication@website.mlb.com) and got a response and/or satisfaction?

One I have is what others discussed, "Team Issue." Viewed a session with 32 items, with 28 GAME USED and 3 TEAM ISSUE. Not sure if that just means the item was authenticated as a piece of memorabilia issued by the team, but not used, or not. Definately confusing.

[PwKw13]

I once questioned a bat from 2009 that was listed in the database as a "Todd Helton Game Used Baseball Bat". I had checked MLB.TV, and it didn't look like Helton used the bat in the game that was referenced (It actually looked like Clint Barmes used it). MLB Authentication responded, "We have talked with the authenticator and they have confirmed that the only info they have was that the bat was a Todd Helton model bat. They had no list of who used it."

[TwinLakesPark]

Are we researching the same series, NY vs Tampa 4/6/12 ?

When looking at an entire series, you will usually see the pitchers jerseys who did not participate in the game as "Team Issued", even though they were worn that game and possibly previous games. I have an authenticated pitcher jersey that is "Team Issued", however I have photo matched it to games earlier in that year and to games the previous year (it was set tagged from the previous year), so it is obvious to me there is a historical flaw in the authentication.

The Tampa series from 4/6/12 (EK009947 - EK009982) has 7 noticeable flaws. Opening day was 4/6/12, with two additional games in the series (7th and 8th). Of all the players jerseys that are authenticated as "Game Used", 7 of them did not play in the game on the 6th. So why would these jerseys be labeled as "Game Used" when they should have been "Team Issued"?

You could make the argument that maybe the authentication was made after the second or third game, but recorded with the incorrect date, but that would leave a discrepancy in 2 remaining players, whereas they did not pitch in any of the 3 games in the home series, yet they are still marked as "Game Used".

I thought I had a good understanding of Team Issued versus Game Used, but researching this series has thrown me for a loop.

[MarlinsFan1993]

I think I can help out with this since it is an issue I have seen quite a bit with my Marlins gamers. Quite a few of my jerseys (at least 4 or 5) are listed in the database as either "autographed" jersey (from more recent years) or "signed" jersey. Upon inspection it is easy to see that they are incorrectly listed. The first thing is the fact that the Marlins employ a team strip tag. All of these jerseys have a strip tag so automatically they become at the very least team issued. Upon further inspection they all have varying degrees of usage (loose threads, faded/crumpled wash tags, etc.) I have even heard of some jerseys being dirty and still earning a non-game used designation.

The reason being (whether for the good of the hobby or not) that MLB authenticators will only ever designate an item as GU if it is seen being removed directly from the field and witnessed by the authenticator. My Marlin gamers that are found in the database as auto or signed is because these jerseys were pulled from the locker room towards the end of the season (usually during the final week) and were signed by the players in the presence of an authenticator who could only vouch for the signature but obviously not which game they were previously used in. A prime example is the 2012 Hanley Ramirez helmet I recently obtained. Even though it is filled with pine tar and obvious use it shows in the database as being team issued. The reason being that Hanley's last game for the Marlins was on 07/24/12 and the helmet was authenticated the following day after Hanley was already in route to St. Louis to join the Dodgers. Thankfully in the additional notes area, the team equipment manager asserts that not only it is indeed game used but was in fact the only helmet Hanley used throughout the 2012 season while with the Marlins.

One thing I have done in the past (only works for items purchased directly from the team) is have the either the Marlins equipment manager or community foundation write me up a letter verifying that the item is indeed game used despite its designation in the MLB database.

[3arod13]

I went through their database, typing in random numbers, to see what many other descriptions say. Even this one is odd. To list this bat as a TEAM ISSUED BROKEN BAT, tells me the bat is a TEAM ISSUED bat, but is also used. But is it Game Used? BP used? Was is used by the Jeff Mathis himself.

I saw other descriptions that were more specific in what innings used, hits, etc.

I think if MLB really designed this program to protect the fans and collectors, they would definately ensure the descriptions are more detailed and accurate.

[3arod13]

Unbelieveable! They sure don't do a good job. This is for a GAME-USED LOCKER NAME PLACE for PITCHER - MARK TEIXEIRA! Really! If they make mistakes like this, I could just imagine how much often this occurs.

If any others find ones like this, please let me know.

[rdeversole]

I went through their database, typing in random numbers, to see what many other descriptions say. Even this one is odd. To list this bat as a TEAM ISSUED BROKEN BAT, tells me the bat is a TEAM ISSUED bat, but is also used. But is it Game Used? BP used? Was is used by the Jeff Mathis himself.

I saw other descriptions that were more specific in what innings used, hits, etc.

I think if MLB really designed this program to protect the fans and collectors, they would definately ensure the descriptions are more detailed and accurate.

I don't see a problem with this entry. The lack of specific information and the fact it says issued would lead me to believe it was authenticated after the fact, therefore would not be deemed as used by MLB per their guidelines. This could mean that it was broken in BP or the game and tagged sometime later in or after the game.

[3arod13]

I don't see a problem with this entry. The lack of specific information and the fact it says issued would lead me to believe it was authenticated after the fact, therefore would not be deemed as used by MLB per their guidelines. This could mean that it was broken in BP or the game and tagged sometime later in or after the game.

Even with what you've said, I still have a problem with that. Too many questions.

[rdeversole]

Understandable. It could be vastly improved.

[TwinLakesPark]

I wanted to follow up on my post as I just received some clarification from the authentic's manager with the team.

MLB will list a jersey as game worn as long as the player is on the active roster during the game in which the jersey is collected. The player does not have to appear in the game.

Team issued jerseys are when the authenticator does not see the player in uniform or the player is not active on the roster.

This settles my research of the series from 4/6/12, but it does not explain why then one of my jerseys from another series in marked as Team Issued when the player was on the active roster.

Interesting stuff.