Name:  271252678611 (1).jpg
Views: 5835
Size:  183.5 KB

Name:  271252678611 (2).jpg
Views: 4176
Size:  183.0 KB

Name:  271252678611 (3).jpg
Views: 4635
Size:  105.8 KB

Name:  271252678611 (4).jpg
Views: 4062
Size:  123.0 KB

Name:  271252678611 (5).jpg
Views: 4107
Size:  155.6 KB

Name:  271252678611 (6).jpg
Views: 4249
Size:  171.0 KB

Name:  271252678611 (7).jpg
Views: 3996
Size:  163.4 KB

Name:  271252678611 (8).jpg
Views: 3937
Size:  217.3 KB

Name:  271252678611 (9).jpg
Views: 3939
Size:  68.2 KB

All images from original eBay Listing #271252678611.

So, I contact the seller from the game used jersey on eBay with the following question: "Dear jerseyking55,

Are you sure this is a true rookie Kobe game worn jersey? It looks identical to the Kobe jersey sold two months ago in eBay item #271252678611 that was sold as a blank pro-cut that was professionally lettered."

I receive the following reply shortly after: "Yes, The jersey is sourced from DC Sports as you can see from the LOA"

So, the seller of this jersey doesn't believe the jersey to be altered or that the jersey listed original in eBay Listing #271252678611 is the same jersey. I tell you what - It is 100% the same exact jersey with the faded autographs on the front and the air-holes match perfectly if you match the two jerseys up from each listing.

Then I submit the autograph on the back of the jersey to PSA/DNA for a Quick Opinion and it comes back not authentic!

Finally, I communicate with the original seller of the jersey selling it as a pro-cut and he told me that he sold the jersey to Mark Montero in August and Mark told him that he sold the jersey to Ryan Covell of Florida as a pro-cut jersey. The seller of the game used jersey on eBay is located in Orlando, FL.

There is a lot of explaining to do here about this jersey as how it has a letter stating it is a game used Kobe Bryant Rookie game worn jersey now with a questionable autograph is a major concern for the integrity of the industry and the hobby as a whole.

I hope these questions are addressed and answered on this forum.