givens patriots jersey in historic yet another FAKE

[amex46]

http://www.historicauctions.com/sear.../imageid/8861/




HIS NAME PLATE/FONT IS WAY WAY OFF DONT TOUCH THIS JERSEY IS 100% FAKE. HAS ANYONE EVER BEEN ABLE TO CONTACT THEM ABOUT ALL THERE FAKE JERSEYS

[Eric]

Amex

You can't just come on here and say something is fake without providing the evidence to back it up, Specifically what is wrong, and what should it look like?

Eric

[amex46]

http://www.hhweb.com/sb39/04SBGivensDavid_small.jpg


check it out it is clear the font and spacing are WAYYYYYYY OFF

[beantown]

I agree with amex on the Givens jersey and I don't like the Dillon jersey being offered either...

Here are the jerseys in question...


PROBLEMS-
1.) Nameplate sits too low on both of the back of these jerseys...
2.) "Givens" font is COMPLETLEY wrong and it appears the nameplate is too long.
3.) The #'s on both appear to be off...almost to "fat"for both...
4.) The rear #'s on "Dillons" jersey sits to low...should be up higher/closer to bottom of shoulder seam...
4.) The Shoulder #'s should be closer to the neck line...to much space on both of these...

Other than that, there rock solid gamers...

[beantown]

Here are my reference photos.....

[beantown]

More reference photos...

[Eric]

I know it has already been illustrated in this thread, but here it is simply, back to back

Here is the 2004 Givens front in the historic auctions. Note the thickness of the #7

Here is a photo of David Givens from 2004

[beantown]

I know it has already been illustrated in this thread, but here it is simply, back to back

Here is the 2004 Givens front in the historic auctions. Note the thickness of the #7
Attachment 2920
Here is a photo of David Givens from 2004
Attachment 2919

Not only that, but look at the inner part of the #8...way off!!!!

[kingjammy24]

both the givens and the dillon have numbers that are clearly the wrong font. oddly enough they both use the same incorrect font. both jerseys are in historic auctions and both authenticated by bernie gernay.

if i were an idiot, i'd say this is all very shocking.

rudy.

[flaco1801]

something is clearly wrong here. a member cant say a shirt is bogus "he needs proof" we take the high road here huh? meanwhile these "authenticators" are clearly stating something is not what its meant to be, and at a price and thats ok? even if one of the forum members makes a mistake,.... its not as bad as buying a fake shirt deemed legit by a LOA. oh wait i think i got it WE DONT WANT TO HURT THE AUCTION HOUSES REPUTATION is that it? i think a list is needed to post the auction houses, their "innocent" mistakes, and who wrote the Loa. time and time they are wrong, the forum members have a better track record. Jeff