Results 11 to 14 of 14
-
11-22-2013, 11:00 AM #11
Re: Livan Hernandez - Nationals 1st Game Baseball Question
Scot at CelebsDirect called me this morning and said that ball on eBay was supposed to be part of inscription balls they were doing on random game used balls from 2005. He said his employee who handles the auctions made an honest mistake. What's scary is that it shows how easily someone could buy one and try to pass it off as "the ball".
The nice thing as I told my friend who is the consignor of the real ball going to Lelands is I just helped him with his research that there was never a 1st pitch ball hologram'd, just 1st hit and 1st HR. His ball will help set the value for my balls as they are all historic.
-
11-22-2013, 12:27 PM #12
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Posts
- 190
Re: Livan Hernandez - Nationals 1st Game Baseball Question
What bothers me about this is why he would even agree to sign that ball with that inscription knowing anyone could easily pass it off as the one. I know it's big business for ball players to sign what the fans pay for but knowing it's not that first pitch ball he should have the common sence to say "I know this is not the first pitch ball so I can not justify writing that inscription"
-
11-22-2013, 02:33 PM #13
Re: Livan Hernandez - Nationals 1st Game Baseball Question
Carbonrosa, I agree which is why I made that statement above. Players are kind enough to inscribe items and then BAM it shows up on eBay with an incorrect description but what do you do when you have an inscription that implies to a normal person that its the ball . The ball is inscribed "1st pitch Washington Nationals 4/4/05 vs Phils". Is the onus on the athlete or the person asking for the inscription?
The only reason I even saw this thread was that someone emailed me to ask my opinion. I'm glad I helped.
-
11-22-2013, 07:17 PM #14
Re: Livan Hernandez - Nationals 1st Game Baseball Question