First fake autograph

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 64SHEA
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 200

    #16
    Re: First fake autograph

    Originally posted by earlywynnfan
    Are you saying this seller is "selling fakes or trying to be deceptive," or did he sell you something he believes in?
    I am not saying that but I have never dealt with this guy before.

    Originally posted by earlywynnfan

    I understand being frustrated, but as I read over your posts, it seems to me you had strong feelings one way, and seem to be disappointed that the group doesn't agree.

    Ken
    Again not at all, in fact if you read my posts I kept trying to steer the topic back to my original question in which I stated I have never had an auto come back as not authentic (seller or buyer) and just wanted to know if it was them norm to ask the seller to pay the authentication fee, that's it. If you read the responses up till RMoody's post they were answering that question. Any fustrtion came from RMoody who almost seems upset that I cant authenticate the item myself and I dared to send it to an authenticator. I had no idea it would turn into this or I wouldn't have even asked.

    Comment

    • 64SHEA
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2011
      • 200

      #17
      Re: First fake autograph

      Originally posted by Griffey24fan
      Why don't you post the autograph in question for some on the board to give you an educated opinion. PSA fails real autographs all the time.
      Like I said the poster is signed by astronauts and lesser known ones at that. It was not sent to PSA it was sent to a highly respected authenticator in the space field.

      Comment

      • Roady
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2012
        • 1430

        #18
        Re: First fake autograph

        You have a degree in physics?

        Comment

        • 64SHEA
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2011
          • 200

          #19
          Re: First fake autograph

          Originally posted by Roady
          You have a degree in physics?
          Yes, why?

          Comment

          • Roady
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2012
            • 1430

            #20
            Re: First fake autograph

            Well, Having a physics degree one would assume you would be highly proficient at problem solving and have the ability to solve challenges by thinking creatively. A physics degree also gives you a grounding in advanced mathematics.

            I guess I can't understand your reluctance to accept your peers suggestions.
            One who is highly proficient at problem solving would assume that getting the same answer from everyone would mean something more than they are picking on me.
            Your advanced mathematical skills should come in handy when 100% of the responses are more or less the same. Now the sample size may be small but when developing a hypothesis within the sample size it would point to you being unable to accept others opinions that differ from your own preconceived notions.
            I also have a hard time understanding why you seem able to accept at 100% an opinion by a 3rd party when your physics degree should have taught you that to have a 100% success rate in any field would be an anomaly.

            Comment

            • 64SHEA
              Senior Member
              • Apr 2011
              • 200

              #21
              Re: First fake autograph

              Really?
              I don't know what to say anymore.
              As I have said over and over all It wanted to know is if it was the norm or not to ask the seller for the authentication fees, especially considering they said they guaranteed it would pass. I don't know what you mean by
              One who is highly proficient at problem solving would assume that getting the same answer from everyone would mean something more than they are picking on me.
              The first two people answered my question, if Mr Moody had never posted I would have said thanks for the advice that would have been that and this thread would have lived in obscurity never to be posted in again. It seems as though your and Mr Moody's point was that I shouldn't have even sent it to an authenticator in the first place. Physics degree or not I don't trust that I can and would say I definitely cant authenticate most autographs myself. 100% of one party's opinion is better then 100% of no ones opinion. I am not sure how everyone else feels but you two have been quite clear in your opinions so I guess then I should just stop collecting autographs sell my stuff and start collecting beanie babies or something.

              Comment

              • RMoody
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2013
                • 180

                #22
                Re: First fake autograph

                Alot of confusion seems to be rooted in a lot of what your saying.

                Nobody here claiming they "authenticate" everything they own. Just like nobody is telling you to stop collecting. It's also pretty childish when your provided answers you clearly don't want to hear to just assume that's what people are saying.

                Personally, I find this particular situation a microcosm of where the community is heading. Place yourself in the sellers situation here.

                You bought an item the seller guaranteed authentic. You made an educated (highly educated considering your degree) opinion the piece was authentic and the seller was genuine. You received the exact item you purchased.

                So as I originally asked, where does doubt creep in? How do you get to the point where your sending this item off to be "authenticated"?

                Apart from that, what exactly was shown to you to prove it was not a genuine autograph?

                Listen, I get asking for people help on items when your not sure. I did that myself on this very forum two weeks ago.

                Your bringing up a sensitive topic for alot of us, because your essentially letting another persons opinion mean more than yours and the sellers word. Clearly based on the topic and your response, you now have zero doubt this item is fake. Thats quite a change of stance, in a short timeframe.

                As I reiterated to you, if you had something tangible to start the doubt , its a different story. Seller kept selling similar items, had a stockpile of them, got caught with fakes, sold you a different item....tons of things.

                You also said this was signed by multiple people, so did all signatures fail or just one?

                In closing, the beanie babies market has dried up in the past few years. I would suggest you take a good look at this site if your serious in moving in that field,



                I work with a woman who collects them and just a ruthless of a field.

                Comment

                • cfern023
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2012
                  • 165

                  #23
                  Re: First fake autograph

                  Originally posted by 64SHEA
                  Like I said the poster is signed by astronauts and lesser known ones at that. It was not sent to PSA it was sent to a highly respected authenticator in the space field.
                  You sent it to an authenticator in the space field?

                  Please, tell me his qualifications? I'd take other random peoples word with exemplars over his any day.

                  Comment

                  • cfern023
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2012
                    • 165

                    #24
                    Re: First fake autograph

                    Might I ask as well---

                    If this a poster with autographs from lesser known astronauts, you have to ask yourself if it is profitable to sell their signatures over a more popular space walker.

                    I can fake a autographed ball of 12 players from the 1998 Marlins, but what would be the point. I can just as easily fake one of the 1997 Marlins Game 7 starting lineup and make alot more money.

                    Comment

                    • 64SHEA
                      Senior Member
                      • Apr 2011
                      • 200

                      #25
                      Re: First fake autograph

                      I don't know where the confusion is, I asked a question, the first two people answered it that was that. I didn't even bring any of this up.
                      Now I am childish because I am basing my response off what you said?

                      For what it's worth, 3rd parties are just that. You either saw it signed or you didn't, it's that simple because that's the only way to know for sure. Anything else is pure speculation, and what matters most is YOURS because its in your collection.
                      I wouldn't say it's distain, it's track record and a long list of errors. They equally have zero accountability
                      Bear in mind , not every "authentication" company has to employ a person with a background in handwriting. Even when they do, such as Chris Morales , mistakes can still get made.
                      Then tell me what your meant by that? What I took from it is authentication company's make mistakes are unreliable and should be avoided. So there not trust worthy but I can rely on random people I meet on a forum.

                      I didn't make an educated guess. I saw an item I had been looking for, asked if it was authenticated he said no but guaranteed it would pass authentication.
                      In any case why do you keep bringing up my degree, how does that increase my ability to spot a fake autograph?

                      Where does doubt creep in? When I bought an autograph from someone I have never met over the Internet. Place yourself in the buyers situation here.
                      I think I have said twice already the seller shipped it directly to the authenticator.

                      He said it had too many atypical traits and formation issues.
                      I understand to get a refund you should need some proof but if there is ANY doubt the same sort of question should be asked of the seller. What exactly was shown to prove it was a genuine autograph?

                      Your bringing up a sensitive topic for a lot of us, because your essentially letting another persons opinion mean more than yours and the sellers word.
                      What are you doing, trying to insist your opinion is right and mine is wrong.
                      The sellers not my buddy from down the street he's a guy from the other side of the world. So I should trust him but not someone recommended to me by other space collectors?

                      Yes all the signatures failed.

                      It seems this all really comes down to someones personal level of trust. You may be fine trusting your instinct, forum members, and even the seller but I'm not. You say my own opinion should matter most well in my opinion my best chance of getting as close to certain as possible was sending it to an authenticator.

                      Also the statement at the end of my last post was a hyperbole.

                      Comment

                      • 64SHEA
                        Senior Member
                        • Apr 2011
                        • 200

                        #26
                        Re: First fake autograph

                        Originally posted by cfern023
                        You sent it to an authenticator in the space field?

                        Please, tell me his qualifications? I'd take other random peoples word with exemplars over his any day.
                        I should have been more clear, he is an authenticate of space related autographs.

                        Comment

                        • 64SHEA
                          Senior Member
                          • Apr 2011
                          • 200

                          #27
                          Re: First fake autograph

                          Originally posted by cfern023
                          Might I ask as well---

                          If this a poster with autographs from lesser known astronauts, you have to ask yourself if it is profitable to sell their signatures over a more popular space walker.

                          I can fake a autographed ball of 12 players from the 1998 Marlins, but what would be the point. I can just as easily fake one of the 1997 Marlins Game 7 starting lineup and make alot more money.
                          Without looking it up can you name all 24 men who have been too the moon? Outside of Armstrong, Aldrin, and maybe Young almost all astronauts are unknown to the none enthusiast yet even the most unknow sell for at least $100.

                          Comment

                          • 64SHEA
                            Senior Member
                            • Apr 2011
                            • 200

                            #28
                            Re: First fake autograph

                            I didn't want to post this because once again it had nothing to do with my question but I contacted the seller and he responded before I even posted this thread. He said while he was surprised he wouldn't question the opinion of the authenticator. I also received the refund before he even replied.

                            I always wondered how someone gets dragged into a back and forth like this but I understand now.
                            Again I guess this is my fault for asking a question.

                            I'm done with this BS. Close the thread, delete it, print it out and hang it above you mantle for all I care. I truly enjoy coming on this site when I get home from work to see whats going on and have had nothing but good dealings with members in relation to game used items but I guess I have learned my lesson. Don't ask a question in the autograph thread unless you willing to blindly accepted the opinion of certain members about a topic that wasn't even part of your question.

                            In the words of Mick Foley
                            Have a nice day!

                            Comment

                            • RMoody
                              Senior Member
                              • Jan 2013
                              • 180

                              #29
                              Re: First fake autograph

                              Originally posted by 64SHEA
                              I think I have said twice already the seller shipped it directly to the authenticator.

                              He said it had too many atypical traits and formation issues.

                              Yes all the signatures failed.

                              It seems this all really comes down to someones personal level of trust. You may be fine trusting your instinct, forum members, and even the seller but I'm not. You say my own opinion should matter most well in my opinion my best chance of getting as close to certain as possible was sending it to an authenticator.
                              Maybe I missed that part, but you sure didn't make it emphatically clear.

                              Your now saying you purchased an item, had the SELLER mail that to a authentication company? You then paid the authenication fee and the item was then shipped to YOU with a rejection letter?

                              I don't even know how to respond to that to be quite honest.

                              How arrogant would a seller need to be to send a straight forgery to a authentication company. Apart from that, why would they then ship that known fake item to you, not return it to the seller or try to mediate the situation.

                              Like I said from the beginning the facts your just coming out with page 3 should have been made post #1.

                              While I still don't trust a majority of authentication company's, you bought something very uniformed apperantly. If he mailed the item to the authentication for you, you should due back everything, including fees. I'm not sure I have ever heard of a situation like that before.

                              Comment

                              • 64SHEA
                                Senior Member
                                • Apr 2011
                                • 200

                                #30
                                Re: First fake autograph

                                I truly get it now.

                                Originally posted by RMoody
                                Maybe I missed that part, but you sure didn't make it emphatically clear.
                                Your now saying you purchased an item, had the SELLER mail that to a authentication company?
                                From my third post

                                Originally posted by 64SHEA
                                I paid with paypal and it came from overseas so I have 180 days to file a dispute. The seller also mailed it directly to the authenticator and they just received it a couple of days ago.

                                You then paid the authenication fee and the item was then shipped to YOU with a rejection letter?

                                I don't even know how to respond to that to be quite honest.

                                How arrogant would a seller need to be to send a straight forgery to a authentication company. Apart from that, why would they then ship that known fake item to you, not return it to the seller or try to mediate the situation.
                                I never said they sent it back to me, they still have it and we are both waiting on the seller who said he would get back to me when he decides what he wants done with it. I also don't know how the sellers knowledge of its authenticity without proof directly affects its actually authenticity.

                                Like I said from the beginning the facts your just coming out with page 3 should have been made post #1.
                                No, that and any other of this information should not have been said in post #1, it has nothing to do with my question. Did you even read my original post? I had one simple question, has anyone had an item come back as not authentic and if so did you ask the seller to pay the fees, that's it that's all I asked. Your the one who posted ignoring my question basically asking me why the hell I would even think of sending anything to an authenticator.

                                Originally posted by 64SHEA
                                I always wondered how someone gets dragged into a back and forth like this but I understand now.
                                Again I guess this is my fault for asking a question.

                                I'm done with this BS. Close the thread, delete it, print it out and hang it above you mantle for all I care. I truly enjoy coming on this site when I get home from work to see whats going on and have had nothing but good dealings with members in relation to game used items but I guess I have learned my lesson. Don't ask a question in the autograph thread unless you willing to blindly accepted the opinion of certain members about a topic that wasn't even part of your question.

                                In the words of Mick Foley
                                Have a nice day!
                                I cant be sucked back into this again my time is to valuable. Responded if you feel you must but I will never look at this thread again. If someone feels they have something of value to add they can pm me.

                                Comment

                                Working...