Hello & Welcome to our community. Is this your first visit? Register
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1,036

    How much proof for a bat's early infancy is enough?

    I feel like this is a match. However, it has been difficult to match the bat during its early infancy. The last few are no doubters and I feel like the first few are also very strong with the few unique characteristics of the tar dot and the shape within the ball mark. It is also very difficult getting the correct angles to match because the bat has such strong use as opposed to the pictures in its early days.

    How many characteristics constitute a strong match. Hosmer only used an SSK for 2 stints in 2013 and this was the first stint. Shortly after these games, he started using a brand new one.

    It's pretty cool to see the bat take shape with use from the 1st picture on 7-24 and into the last one on 7-30.

    Tell me what you all think.
    Attached Images Attached Images       

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1,036

    Re: How much proof for a bat's early infancy is enough?

    Dangit The Crop Photos Didn't Come Through! Hold Up!

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1,036

    Re: How much proof for a bat's early infancy is enough?

    Ok disregard previous pics. These should be the right ones.
    Attached Images Attached Images      

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    835

    Re: How much proof for a bat's early infancy is enough?

    The "tar dot" you mention - isn't that just the maple bat slope test dot that goes on every maple bat as mandated by MLB? I wouldn't consider that a unique characteristic to this bat, unless you feel the shape of the dot IS somehow unique compared to his other gamers.
    - CINCINNATI REDS/JOEY VOTTO BATS
    Email: rdeversole@gmail.com Twitter: @dugoutrelics

  5. #5
    Senior Member gorilla777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,464

    Re: How much proof for a bat's early infancy is enough?

    Like the fellow with the DiMaggio bat, it's preferable to have his DNA on it, along with the FBI proof. It was on YouTube, so it must be true.

  6. #6

    Re: How much proof for a bat's early infancy is enough?

    Quote Originally Posted by rdeversole View Post
    The "tar dot" you mention - isn't that just the maple bat slope test dot that goes on every maple bat as mandated by MLB? I wouldn't consider that a unique characteristic to this bat, unless you feel the shape of the dot IS somehow unique compared to his other gamers.
    Either way they don't even look the same. I can't find anything in that last picture that screams match to me.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1,036

    Re: How much proof for a bat's early infancy is enough?

    Quote Originally Posted by rdeversole View Post
    The "tar dot" you mention - isn't that just the maple bat slope test dot that goes on every maple bat as mandated by MLB? I wouldn't consider that a unique characteristic to this bat, unless you feel the shape of the dot IS somehow unique compared to his other gamers.

    RD, the tar dot is not the slope test. The dot on this bat is a piece of tar that is actually raised up a bit. I'll have to look for the mark on the bat. It could be covered up with tar.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1,036

    Re: How much proof for a bat's early infancy is enough?

    Quote Originally Posted by gorilla777 View Post
    Like the fellow with the DiMaggio bat, it's preferable to have his DNA on it, along with the FBI proof. It was on YouTube, so it must be true.
    Very nice. Maybe I';ll ask him to rub it a little and spit on it.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1,036

    Re: How much proof for a bat's early infancy is enough?

    Quote Originally Posted by johnsontravis@ymail.com View Post
    Either way they don't even look the same. I can't find anything in that last picture that screams match to me.
    Which picture are you referring to? The one with him batting in the bottom of the 3rd I think it is? If you look at the ball mark on the barrel, the shape withing the mark is the same. As far as the dot not looking the same, it is very difficult to get the correct angle in a picture. If I angle it the way the bat is being held, it makes the top look super thick. If I angle it sideways, then I am not able to crop it how I need it to look.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1,036

    Re: How much proof for a bat's early infancy is enough?

    Quote Originally Posted by sportsnbikes View Post
    Very nice. Maybe I';ll ask him to rub it a little and spit on it.
    I guess maybe I better not be tired and post anymore because that completely didn't sound right.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.
vBulletin Skin By: PurevB.com