Photomatch?

[MikeKam]

Yeah definitely. I can see some loose stitching that's featured on his left thumb and the sizes of each finger seem right but I may just be "wanting" to see that as you say. Same thing as when I started collecting autographs. First baseball I bought turned out to be a forgery but it took me a long time to finally admit that.

[ShaimOnYou]

A true photo match is a definitive visual display of evidence showing characteristics that prove an item is what it claims to be.

Although I don't see anything ruling out the possibility of a photo match, it's a stretch to say you have presented a photo match here.

That said, you very well may have the gloves worn in that photo. There just isn't enough detail to establish that fact, IMO.

Chris

[danesei@yahoo.com]

If you're trying to establish a photomatch based upon how the gloves were cut, you'd need the following:

1) High resolution version of the image from Getty.
2) A better depth of field on the focus for your camera.

A lot of the detail is simply blurred out in the pictures you've opted to share.

Part of the problem is using cutting & loose stitching along the cuts/seams as a basis for a match. Since this is something that can be somewhat replicated with a pair of scissors, I'm not sure the logic is the same that applies when comparing puckering of threads on a game used jersey.