Hello & Welcome to our community. Is this your first visit? Register
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    269

    Opinions on inscribed game used items

    Not sure how else to phrase but say you are looking to buy a game used bat and the bat is not only signed but inscribed "hr #***".

    Without an exact photo/video match, how much stock do you put into that bat actually having been used to hit that exact hr?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    "Let me start by telling you this: I have never used steroids, period."

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    814

    Re: Opinions on inscribed game used items

    Not much. A photomatch is priceless.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    269

    Re: Opinions on inscribed game used items

    Quote Originally Posted by onlyalbert View Post
    Not much. A photomatch is priceless.
    I absolutely agree. I suppose I'm looking for a way to talk myself into buying one that claims to be a specific hr but I cannot find one shred of solid evidence.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    "Let me start by telling you this: I have never used steroids, period."

  4. #4
    Senior Member emann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    894

    Re: Opinions on inscribed game used items

    I've got a few bats like this, but none have been very expensive (nothing over $350ish)... A couple of the bats are from lesser players, the type that there would really not be much of a monetary incentive to fake the HR designation. So combining that logic and the overall use on the bats, I assume those are real. There is one that came from the player's rep, shows less use and I've been somewhat iffy on it. It is a nice looking bat though, so I take the extra inscription as a bonus.

    If any of these were high dollar items, I definitely would not be as trusting of the player notations. To me, the photomatch is king—MLB auth, COA, LOA, they all come second.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    269

    Re: Opinions on inscribed game used items

    Quote Originally Posted by emann View Post
    I've got a few bats like this, but none have been very expensive (nothing over $350ish)... A couple of the bats are from lesser players, the type that there would really not be much of a monetary incentive to fake the HR designation. So combining that logic and the overall use on the bats, I assume those are real. There is one that came from the player's rep, shows less use and I've been somewhat iffy on it. It is a nice looking bat though, so I take the extra inscription as a bonus.

    If any of these were high dollar items, I definitely would not be as trusting of the player notations. To me, the photomatch is king—MLB auth, COA, LOA, they all come second.
    Thanks emann.

    Btw, I saw a private message from you. Not sure if we ever wound up speaking. I've been away from the hobby for a while.

    Email me if you'd like.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    "Let me start by telling you this: I have never used steroids, period."

  6. #6
    Senior Member 3arod13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,923

    Re: Opinions on inscribed game used items

    Not always easy to find a photo match. 100% provenance helps.
    Regards, Tony

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    ~I'm sorry, I can't hear you....my World Series Ring is making too much NOISE! - Alex Rodriguez~

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5
Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.
vBulletin Skin By: PurevB.com