Results 31 to 35 of 35
Thread: Lou Gehrig attributed Glove. LOL
-
10-21-2016, 04:35 PM #31
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 914
Re: Lou Gehrig attributed Glove. LOL
If you are not going to buy the case presented, fine. That is your choice as a buyer. But to publicly try and shame an item without concrete eviene of why you are shaming it is wrong.
The Pujols post responsibly explaining its problems is a good example of how it should be done and the action taken by the auction house is what you want to see.
Also, did Yanks call the auction house to voice his concerns prior to posting here?
-
10-21-2016, 04:37 PM #32
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
- Posts
- 26
-
10-21-2016, 04:39 PM #33
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
- Posts
- 26
-
10-21-2016, 04:58 PM #34
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 2,547
Re: Lou Gehrig attributed Glove. LOL
They don't even have concrete evidence that it is real.
And the fact that they say "No disputes or differing opinions from any and all outside authenticators will warrant any type of refund or dispute." shows they know it wouldn't pass authentication from people who's opinion is actually valued when coming to professional model gloves in this hobby.
Also I didn't call them but I did contact them days before this post. And I'm sure several other people have emailed them before me.
-
10-21-2016, 06:51 PM #35
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
- Posts
- 742
Re: Lou Gehrig attributed Glove. LOL
I don't see anything fraudulent or intentionally misleading here like the Pujols they were good enough to pull when they realized what they had or didn't have for that matter. This is just a case of little evidence that's nothing more than circumstantial. I think the auction makes its case which is reasonably weak in my mind but is as much as you can really make on a glove like this without direct provenance. Clearly the disclaimer statement in the auction says it all. If u buy we wash our hands of it. I think that makes a loud statement and buyers should be smart enough to understand what that means. No reason to say this item is fraudulent, its just is what it is............. a maybe, could be, who knows if Gehrig wore it glove and the price should reflect that.