Results 1 to 10 of 14
Threaded View
-
01-19-2006, 10:02 AM #10
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 730
The Devil's Advocate
Well, you have to admit, he is consistent in his opinion, right or wrong.
The items he reviewed again were "alleged" to be items he reviewed 5+ years ago.
Being as these were from totally different and new "clients", you cannot factually state he authenticated these just because they came from a certain individual or group.
It appears he truly believes these items are consistent with the individual's handwriting and/or autograph.
Perhaps it is not dishonesty on the part of Mr. Frangipani, but his honest opinion.
Just like the opinion's of the other four individuals / companies that failed this test, but were not exposed or named on a national broadcast. I truly wonder why their names were not exposed. Doesn't seem very fair or unbiased to me.
Let the discussion begin.