Well, you have to admit, he is consistent in his opinion, right or wrong.

The items he reviewed again were "alleged" to be items he reviewed 5+ years ago.

Being as these were from totally different and new "clients", you cannot factually state he authenticated these just because they came from a certain individual or group.

It appears he truly believes these items are consistent with the individual's handwriting and/or autograph.

Perhaps it is not dishonesty on the part of Mr. Frangipani, but his honest opinion.

Just like the opinion's of the other four individuals / companies that failed this test, but were not exposed or named on a national broadcast. I truly wonder why their names were not exposed. Doesn't seem very fair or unbiased to me.

Let the discussion begin.