I too have noticed Jays gamers going for considerably less, and some being listed for less and having unsuccessful sales.

For example

http://cgi.ebay.com/2002-CARPENTER-T...QQcmdZViewItem (No Bid)

http://cgi.ebay.com/2002-BLUE-JAYS-R...QQcmdZViewItem (No Bid)

http://cgi.ebay.com/2003-BLUE-JAYS-V...QQcmdZViewItem (no Bid)

http://cgi.ebay.com/2005-BLUE-JAYS-T...QQcmdZViewItem (No Bid)

http://cgi.ebay.com/1998-Game-Used-H...QQcmdZViewItem (No Bid)

http://cgi.ebay.com/2005-BLUE-JAYS-C...QQcmdZViewItem (No Bid)

http://cgi.ebay.com/2002-JOSE-CRUZ-J...QQcmdZViewItem (No Bid)

http://cgi.ebay.com/1995-LEYVA-16-To...QQcmdZViewItem (No Bid)

http://cgi.ebay.com/2002-PROKOPEC-44...QQcmdZViewItem (No Bid)

http://cgi.ebay.com/1994-Toronto-Blu...QQcmdZViewItem (Successful Bid)

Rudy, I agree with you in as much as if it is a certain player that you collect (especially when jersey sets were more limited) then you shouldn't really consider the law of substitution. I too have overpaid on a specific player. I purchased a Cubs Jeff Kunkel jersey. I think I paid $300 which was $200 more than I had ever paid for any other Kunkel jersey. Why? Simply because it was the only one ever seen.

However, in the realm of 2005 or 2006 Jays jerseys, we have heard that there are upwards of 12-20 sets for the stars. This would certainly put many more into the market than would have been in 1990 or prior. Prices are starting to show it, in the secondary market. I think these auctions may not provie it, but at least support such an argument.