Results 21 to 30 of 38
-
11-06-2009, 08:07 PM #21
Re: OT: 30 for 30 on ESPN: "Without Bias"
Les Zukor
bagwellgameused@gmail.com
Collecting Jeff Bagwell Cleats, Jerseys, & Other Items
http://www.bagwellgameused.com
(617) 682-0408
-
11-06-2009, 08:08 PM #22
Re: OT: 30 for 30 on ESPN: "Without Bias"
Best emoticon. Ever
-
11-06-2009, 08:24 PM #23
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 1,439
Re: OT: 30 for 30 on ESPN: "Without Bias"
I do too. I feel badly. I really do.
But I can't find myself asking "Why?" Or thinking how tragic it was.....how unbelievable it must be for the family.....how terrible it is for the fans who lost a star.......when that person of interest took drugs which caused the disaster.
It's old news. Figure it OUT already. Drugs kill users, not "genetics". Len Bias' heart didn't stop because of "genetics".
Just like accidents kill. Not lack of "warning labels". Somewhere in time we lost our strength as a society to accept the pitfalls in life, and we started turning our sorrows to expensive attorneys who have f'ed up our entire existences. We have sacrificed "responsibility" with "judgements". Great. Nice.
And you all wonder why paying for insurance has become burdensome?
Figure it out, society, before it's too late. It's old already.
-
11-06-2009, 08:38 PM #24
Re: OT: 30 for 30 on ESPN: "Without Bias"
Just like accidents kill. Not lack of "warning labels". Somewhere in time we lost our strength as a society to accept the pitfalls in life, and we started turning our sorrows to expensive attorneys who have f'ed up our entire existences. We have sacrificed "responsibility" with "judgements". Great. Nice.[/quote]
Why does everything need to be about a nebulous notion of responsibility? For me, rather than judging people, it makes more sense to ask why this is happening, and realize that complex factors lead to drug use and abuse. As you may or may not realize, addiction has a biological basis.
That's not to say that there aren't other factors involved. Societal attitudes toward drugs play a part in this, as do people's past history of addiction and mental illness. You keep clinging to concepts like "responsibility", yet you have not explained why we have the kind of agency that your notion of responsibility is predicated upon.
And you all wonder why paying for insurance has become burdensome?
Figure it out, society, before it's too late. It's old already.Les Zukor
bagwellgameused@gmail.com
Collecting Jeff Bagwell Cleats, Jerseys, & Other Items
http://www.bagwellgameused.com
(617) 682-0408
-
11-06-2009, 08:39 PM #25
Re: OT: 30 for 30 on ESPN: "Without Bias"
Why does everything need to be about a nebulous notion of responsibility? For me, rather than judging people, it makes more sense to ask why this is happening, and realize that complex factors lead to drug use and abuse. As you may or may not realize, addiction has a biological basis.
That's not to say that there aren't other factors involved. Societal attitudes toward drugs play a part in this, as do people's past history of addiction and mental illness. You keep clinging to concepts like "responsibility", yet you have not explained why we have the kind of agency that your notion of responsibility is predicated upon.
And you all wonder why paying for insurance has become burdensome?
Figure it out, society, before it's too late. It's old already.Les Zukor
bagwellgameused@gmail.com
Collecting Jeff Bagwell Cleats, Jerseys, & Other Items
http://www.bagwellgameused.com
(617) 682-0408
-
11-06-2009, 11:59 PM #26
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 1,439
-
11-07-2009, 12:13 AM #27
Re: OT: 30 for 30 on ESPN: "Without Bias"
You're ignoring my points and assuming that concepts like responsibility are a given. They are not. For the amount of Frik-bashing you do, I would think that you would have composed an intelligent response to my question.
Your modus operandi is to call me stupid, say I am impervious to ratiocination, etc. Yet you have shown little capacity to respond seriously to a thing I am saying. Instead of just spewing about how the world is going to hell, present a cogent argument. It's not too much to ask.Les Zukor
bagwellgameused@gmail.com
Collecting Jeff Bagwell Cleats, Jerseys, & Other Items
http://www.bagwellgameused.com
(617) 682-0408
-
11-07-2009, 12:29 AM #28
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 1,439
Re: OT: 30 for 30 on ESPN: "Without Bias"
The Louisville Slugger jury verdict rendering, the shootings which are becoming a daily occurance, the political environment, the wars, and your reasoning ability have all proved my point. What left is there to argue?
How can I present an "argument" when I have no idea what the hell you are talking about? What "agency" is it you keep referring to? I mean, please, let's just forget the whole thing.
Tim Lincecum is a great guy, OK? Enjoy the squirrel.
-
11-07-2009, 12:52 AM #29
Re: OT: 30 for 30 on ESPN: "Without Bias"
Wikipedia is your friend.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agency_%28philosophy%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structure_and_agencyLes Zukor
bagwellgameused@gmail.com
Collecting Jeff Bagwell Cleats, Jerseys, & Other Items
http://www.bagwellgameused.com
(617) 682-0408
-
11-07-2009, 12:11 PM #30
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 1,210
Re: OT: 30 for 30 on ESPN: "Without Bias"
HEY MODS!! Why was my post removed, when ones like this remain?? I have been a long-time member of this forum, outlasting everybody who was here when I first came on, so I think I deserve an explanation: In what way does this post support the purpose of the forum? Why is Squeeze any different from Joel Alpert? Oh, wait, you guys wouldn't do anything to him when he repeatedly broke rules, either.
Ken
earlywynnfan5@hotmail.com