George Brett's last home game bat... NOT!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CampWest
    replied
    Re: George Brett's last home game bat... NOT!

    The bat was relisted and sold with a $2500 BIN, but still containing the probably false claim that it was the bat from the last home game (since it was allegedly acquired from the same source that misinformed on the jersey). Still a great bat of course.

    No further signs of the jersey being relisted as of yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • spartakid
    replied
    Re: George Brett's last home game bat... NOT!

    Originally posted by suicide_squeeze
    My friend, trust me when I tell you he was a willing fradulent seller before anyone asked him any questions. Sometimes......it's just so obvious.
    I should have listened to you and not even bothered...

    Leave a comment:


  • suicide_squeeze
    replied
    Re: George Brett's last home game bat... NOT!

    Originally posted by CampWest
    Classic... photo evidence that it is a different #5 and its just one person's opinion. Of course I am not surprised, because his response to me was "I would not have anything in my collection that was phoney." Which seems like an odd statement for somebody asking a question about the items provenance.

    oh well, not much more that can be done. He has been provided with clear evidence that it is not the last home game jersey, but refuses to listen. If he *was* an honest and misinformed owner, he is now a willing fraudulent seller.

    My friend, trust me when I tell you he was a willing fradulent seller before anyone asked him any questions. Sometimes......it's just so obvious.

    Leave a comment:


  • CampWest
    replied
    Re: George Brett's last home game bat... NOT!

    Originally posted by suicide_squeeze
    thank you fpr ypur opinion
    - rjbmagic1974
    Classic... photo evidence that it is a different #5 and its just one person's opinion. Of course I am not surprised, because his response to me was "I would not have anything in my collection that was phoney." Which seems like an odd statement for somebody asking a question about the items provenance.

    oh well, not much more that can be done. He has been provided with clear evidence that it is not the last home game jersey, but refuses to listen. If he *was* an honest and misinformed owner, he is now a willing fraudulent seller.

    Leave a comment:


  • suicide_squeeze
    replied
    Re: George Brett's last home game bat... NOT!

    Well, here's the latest question and answer session I had with him. Seeing that you gave him the link to this discussion, he's probably upset now that his "gig is up", and that would explain his typo-ridden short answer to me.


    My question:

    Dear rjbmagic1974,

    Hello again, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I think the guy that gave you this jersey isn't honest. The last home jersey worn by George Brett had a different font in the number "5". It was squared off to a 90 degree angle, not "cut-off" at a 45 degree angle like the one you are offering. That is the case on the front, and the back. Also, the color of the numbers (and letters on the back of this jersey) appear to be a much brighter royal blue than the rest of the jersey, not a trait you would find on an authentic gamer. Perhaps this was a jersey belonging to another player which had the number changed, or a "blank" jersey that later had the numbers and "BRETT" applied to the back? In any case, it makes me weary to bid on the bat, which I was very interested in, because if the jersey is bad, in all likelyhood the bat is not what this guy is telling you it is either. It sure appears to be a great authentic game-used George Brett bat, but probably not a "historic" one. Good luck.

    - suicide_squeeze




    His answer:

    Dear suicide_squeeze,

    thank you fpr ypur opinion

    - rjbmagic1974





    Be looking for theses items to show up for sale soon on craigslist......

    Leave a comment:


  • spartakid
    replied
    Re: George Brett's last home game bat... NOT!

    I guess that cynicism comes with age, I'm sure I'll get there eventually. Well I gave him the link to this, and of all the responses, he asks how the jersey could be fake with a DATED SIGNATURE. Of course anyone with a sharpie can add the date below the signature, duh. Don't expect that I'll hear back from him. It's Unfortunate that people like this taint the hobby, oh well. Hopefully no one purchases either one, you'd think he may start the bidding a little lower, but ah yes, greed on top of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • suicide_squeeze
    replied
    Re: George Brett's last home game bat... NOT!

    Originally posted by spartakid
    Well probably not, but on the off chance that he's been misinformed or misled Can't hurt to let him know, maybe he'll do the right thing. There have been a couple of occasions which I've contacted sellers and they've removed items, not realizing they weren't legit.
    You're a good man, Ricardo. You actually give the benefit of the doubt to guys like this. And I'm sure, on rare occasions, one or two of them actually are unaware of what they have, which is fake garbage (at least in regards to the jersey) that they truly believe to be legit.

    But me.....I have become a bit more cynical in my years. I believe that by informing this guy we are onto his BS, he may end the auction and appear to be the kind that really cares. But in reality, he'll be genuinely pissed off that we ruined his chance to lambast some poor unknowing soul while "offing" his garbage, all the while limiting his "options" on how to get rid of the crap. He'll be left with "craigslist".....or some other meaningless auction site I never bother to look at, where true collectors that would spend the real money on authentic items don't bother with.

    No......if he had legit items, as he is advertising them on ebay, he would know the best place to "auction" them off would be in a major sports auction. He would get top dollar for them there. But one problem......they would have to be real.

    He knows exactly what he's doing. And in order to attempt to protect our fellow lesser-knowledgable collectors who don't yet know about this site and how to properly do their homework, I will do the duty and inform him that his stuff is freshly deposited, steamy on the sidewalk, out of the rear of an over-fed St. Bernard. If I receive a response worth posting, I'll share with you all.

    Leave a comment:


  • spartakid
    replied
    Re: George Brett's last home game bat... NOT!

    Well probably not, but on the off chance that he's been misinformed or misled Can't hurt to let him know, maybe he'll do the right thing. There have been a couple of occasions which I've contacted sellers and they've removed items, not realizing they weren't legit.

    Leave a comment:


  • suicide_squeeze
    replied
    Re: George Brett's last home game bat... NOT!

    Originally posted by spartakid
    Has anyone pointed out the proof you guys have come up with? Would be interesting to see what he says....

    Would it really Ricardo?


    I could think of better things to do with my time......like.....sleeping......or digging a splinter out of my finger with a needle......

    The dude is a lier and not worth the nonsense.

    Leave a comment:


  • spartakid
    replied
    Re: George Brett's last home game bat... NOT!

    Has anyone pointed out the proof you guys have come up with? Would be interesting to see what he says....

    Leave a comment:


  • spartakid
    replied
    Re: George Brett's last home game bat... NOT!

    Has anyone pointed out the proof you guys have come us with? Would be interesting to see what he says....

    Leave a comment:


  • CampWest
    replied
    Re: George Brett's last home game bat... NOT!

    Question:

    Dear rjbmagic1974,
    How were you able to acquire both Brett's last home game jersey and last home game bat? Trying to establish the provenance before considering any bids. Thanks.

    Response:
    Although they weren't given directly to me that night, they were given to a person I knew and then indirectly to me. If you have ever seen any of the books that cam out about Brett shortly after retirement, you will see him wearing the jersey and using the bat. I am a private collector who doesn't buy and sell for a living. I would not have anything in my collection that was phoney. I am only selling because I have a chance to buy some very expensive items that I have been eyeing for years.
    - rjbmagic1974


    Originally posted by suicide_squeeze
    In regards to his "last game used bat", I asked the seller the following:

    Leave a comment:


  • suicide_squeeze
    replied
    Re: George Brett's last home game bat... NOT!

    In regards to his "last game used bat", I asked the seller the following:

    Dear rjbmagic1974,

    Hello, very nice bat. I was wondering, how do you know it was used in his last home game? Does it come with a letter from him stating so? I am very interested in this bat, thanks.

    - suicide_squeeze




    Here was his responce:


    Dear suicide_squeeze,

    The same person who was close to Brett got the bat and jersey immediately after the game. I got them shortly afterwards and have had them since. George gave away lots of things to people he liked including several awards that he won throughout his career which I have seen in auctions. This is a really great piece. Whoever buys it will not be disappointed.

    - rjbmagic1974




    They'll be disappointed if they are buying it thinking it was used in Brett's last game.....








    Leave a comment:


  • CampWest
    replied
    Re: George Brett's last home game bat... NOT!

    Nice work Rudy/kingjammy. Thanks

    Originally posted by kingjammy24
    the front "5" and back "5" are not correct for either 1993 or even 1992.

    jersey has a collar tag which is atypical. strangely, it's not the first brett jersey i've seen with a collar tag.

    anyway, the tagging is odd. i'm not sure how spares were tagged for the royals in 1993 but it would seem strange to tag them with a set number (in this case, set 3). i'd think the spares either wouldn't be strip tagged at all or tagged with only the year. here's a comparison of the ebay brett tagging with other 1993 royals tagging. it's almost as if someone took a standard royals tag and cut the portion that had the player number and name off and were left with just the bottom set-year portion.

    rudy.

    Leave a comment:


  • kingjammy24
    replied
    Re: George Brett's last home game bat... NOT!

    the front "5" and back "5" are not correct for either 1993 or even 1992.

    jersey has a collar tag which is atypical. strangely, it's not the first brett jersey i've seen with a collar tag.

    anyway, the tagging is odd. i'm not sure how spares were tagged for the royals in 1993 but it would seem strange to tag them with a set number (in this case, set 3). i'd think the spares either wouldn't be strip tagged at all or tagged with only the year. here's a comparison of the ebay brett tagging with other 1993 royals tagging. it's almost as if someone took a standard royals tag and cut the portion that had the player number and name off and were left with just the bottom set-year portion.



    rudy.

    Leave a comment:

Working...