I hope you didn't bid on this Ripken...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • gorilla777
    replied
    Re: I hope you didn't bid on this Ripken...

    I think they should stick with high end cards too. Hasn't there been a bogus or at least questionable GU item, usually a jersey, in every auction the last few years?


    Ben

    Leave a comment:


  • frikativ54
    replied
    Re: I hope you didn't bid on this Ripken...

    Originally posted by sox83cubs84
    My main PC is down, so I'm at an alternate PC location. As a result, I can't post a picture of the proper tag at thi time. Several teams used the 4-digit year tag besides Baltimore in 1996. Among them: Red Sox, Dodgers, Indians and Mariners.

    Dave Miedema
    Thanks, Dave. I sure hope you get your computer back to running normally soon. Let's hope that the problem corrects itself like last time.

    Leave a comment:


  • sox83cubs84
    replied
    Re: I hope you didn't bid on this Ripken...

    Originally posted by frikativ54
    Was the four-digit year something that was particular to Orioles tagging? I'm curious because this site's Primer on Russell Tagging doesn't show year tagging for 1996 jerseys. Also, what's wrong with the font on the tag? What should it look like? Thanks.

    -Frik
    My main PC is down, so I'm at an alternate PC location. As a result, I can't post a picture of the proper tag at thi time. Several teams used the 4-digit year tag besides Baltimore in 1996. Among them: Red Sox, Dodgers, Indians and Mariners.

    Dave Miedema

    Leave a comment:


  • Flamechicken
    replied
    Re: I hope you didn't bid on this Ripken...

    Makes you wonder how it passed GFs authentication process in order to get one of their certs.

    Leave a comment:


  • legaleagle92481
    replied
    Re: I hope you didn't bid on this Ripken...

    I think its time Mile High got out of the game used business every auction there is a new thread on how one of their high priced gamers is not legit. H

    Leave a comment:


  • nickacs
    replied
    Re: I hope you didn't bid on this Ripken...

    Originally posted by silkman22
    No returns on this jersey by the way - the auction rules state that because of the extensive research done by several experts employed by Mile High and the accompanying Grey Flannel LOA, all sales are final.
    LMAO... ahhh, gotta love it.. Glad their new show will "enlighten" collectors to the "most knowledgable game worn jersey expert in the world". Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • silkman22
    replied
    Re: I hope you didn't bid on this Ripken...

    The Ripken jersey sold for $4,075.75:



    Not only is the tag incorrect, the Orioles never wore this style of jersey. Prior to the season, the orange piping on the front of all the Baltimore alternate jerseys was removed by the team. A quick 2 minute search of Getty Images shows numerous pictures of these alternate jerseys without the piping (including a few Ripken images from '96).

    No returns on this jersey by the way - the auction rules state that because of the extensive research done by several experts employed by Mile High and the accompanying Grey Flannel LOA, all sales are final.

    JP

    Leave a comment:


  • frikativ54
    replied
    Re: I hope you didn't bid on this Ripken...

    Originally posted by sox83cubs84
    That, the size of the tag, and the numeric font on the tag. The tag should have a 4-digit year (1996) and should be larger.

    Dave Miedema
    Was the four-digit year something that was particular to Orioles tagging? I'm curious because this site's Primer on Russell Tagging doesn't show year tagging for 1996 jerseys. Also, what's wrong with the font on the tag? What should it look like? Thanks.

    -Frik

    Leave a comment:


  • sox83cubs84
    replied
    Re: I hope you didn't bid on this Ripken...

    Originally posted by frikativ54
    Dave,

    Is it the 48-96 part that has you concerned? If so, I haven't seen that either.
    That, the size of the tag, and the numeric font on the tag. The tag should have a 4-digit year (1996) and should be larger.

    Dave Miedema

    Leave a comment:


  • frikativ54
    replied
    Re: I hope you didn't bid on this Ripken...

    Originally posted by sox83cubs84
    ...in Mile High's auction closing Thursday. The tag is not consistent with anything Russell used anywhere in 1996.
    Dave,

    Is it the 48-96 part that has you concerned? If so, I haven't seen that either.

    Leave a comment:


  • OaklandAsFan
    replied
    Re: I hope you didn't bid on this Ripken...

    nice, I was gonna watch that jersey out of curiosity.

    Leave a comment:


  • sox83cubs84
    started a topic I hope you didn't bid on this Ripken...

    I hope you didn't bid on this Ripken...

    ...in Mile High's auction closing Thursday. The tag is not consistent with anything Russell used anywhere in 1996. I feel sorry for the bidder who ends up with this.






    1996 Cal Ripken Baltimore Orioles Game-Used Sunday Alternate Jersey
Working...