Re: Albert Pujols Louisville order question (2002-2003)
Hi Tony,
You will have to be patient. You will find tons of Pujols bats out there, but very very few authentic gamers. Even the Cardinals dont get very many if any per season to auction at their charity events.
Keep looking though, you never know when you'll run across one.
Jason
Albert Pujols Louisville order question (2002-2003)
Collapse
X
-
Re: Albert Pujols Louisville order question (2002-2003)
Thanks again.
Honestly, over the past week I would feel comfortable going after a Pujols bat. (IF i could ever find one now). This site is really a good thing for people, it allows you to research the item as well as the person your buying from. Im happy to be a part of it. Hopefully I have a lot of hobby left in me to use this.
-TonyLeave a comment:
-
Re: Albert Pujols Louisville order question (2002-2003)
If Ron has offered you a refund, take it fast and don't look back. I've never dealt with CSI before but knowing what I do about them, I'm in no hurry to start.
The best thing you can do for yourself is to learn everything you can about what you're collecting. Before jumping into your next Pujols purchase, take a look at all the Pujols bat threads on GUU and visit Jeff Scott's site. Good luck Tony.Leave a comment:
-
Re: Albert Pujols Louisville order question (2002-2003)
Thanks RJ, I guess an Albert bat has become my "white whale", Im looking for a bat if anyone has one.
-Thanks,
TonyLeave a comment:
-
Re: Albert Pujols Louisville order question (2002-2003)
Don't be too discouraged Tony. You can bet that many, if not most, collectors have had an experience similar to yours at some point. You'll be smarter for the experience, since forewarned is forearmed.
Also, you can be sure that Albert was not involved in anything fishy. The guy is as upstanding as they come.
It's not unusual to see Sharpie get smudged on a finished bat. The ink doesn't set up as quickly because of the finish. That's a long inscription, and Albert's hand would have moved over the first few letters as he wrote, smudging them.
I'm glad to hear the dealer has agreed to return your money and wish every dealer offered a similar return privilege. Please post an update when you've received the refund, as I'm sure many of us will continue to follow the thread until we know the situation has been resolved.
Rick
rickjlucas@gmail.comLeave a comment:
-
Re: Albert Pujols Louisville order question (2002-2003)
Yea, it's tough. I was just a kid when I went after the bats, and I thought CSI was a pretty safe bet on game used items based on the inventory and contacts. Apparently not.
Has anyone initiated a law suit against this company? Or anyone else in that matter?
-TonyLeave a comment:
-
Re: Albert Pujols Louisville order question (2002-2003)
don't feel bad, I've bought 2 pujols bats myself in the past, and both turned out to be fakes....just a lesson you learn in this hobby. But rather than want to get out of the hobby, use this board for resources and do your homework before you make your next purchase. There are tons of people here who can help you or offer advice on any item you want to purchase prior to doing so. I know I've been able to avoid bad deals with the help of everyone here....good luck with the bat...take care broLeave a comment:
-
Re: Albert Pujols Louisville order question (2002-2003)
Yea I screwed up. Way to be nonchalant about it. Its hard enough losing about a year worth of money I saved...
-TonyLeave a comment:
-
Re: Albert Pujols Louisville order question (2002-2003)
huh? Your right, they are blue instead. White doesn't show up on Maple well. Blue transfers with no seam marks? It is the same. It sucks, I know I had a black bat from CSI that had the white marks. Just an expensive lesson for me.Leave a comment:
-
Re: Albert Pujols Louisville order question (2002-2003)
Albert signed it, and I think he signed it after. The smudge indicates he signed over a ball mark. The seller said I can return it. Looks like that is what I will do.
-TonyLeave a comment:
-
Re: Albert Pujols Louisville order question (2002-2003)
I'm really not sure what to make of this thread. You trust the guy who sold you the bat, and then go on to say Albert participated in ripping you off.
Its obviously a promo bat that more than likely was not used by Pujols. If you bought the bat within the last week, I'd try to get my money back.Leave a comment:
-
Re: Albert Pujols Louisville order question (2002-2003)
I will tell you all, one week on this site and I want to be out of the hobby. Very sad. I was so proud of the bat, and now I am miserable, I saved up so much money to purchase that bat. Heart is absolutely broken, not so much that I was ripped off, but that I will never be able to own an Albert Pujols game used bat.
I wish athletes could read this. 25 year old young man, who not only has been ripped off, but more than likely albert participated in it (the auto is legit; no one can question that).
-Tony ServittoLeave a comment:
-
Re: Albert Pujols Louisville order question (2002-2003)
A great example of the lace indentations can be seen on the photo in the light of the McGwire HR bat on this thread, the first post.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Albert Pujols Louisville order question (2002-2003)
Ive noticed if you hold the bat up near a light on most game used bats you can see lace indentions that are not always easily seen. The laces from fastballs coming in at 90mph+ in addition to bat speeds around the same will cause the laces from the baseball to leave indentations.
Every game used bat that I have ever owned has had the lace indentations and it is one of the first things I look for. Hope this helps!Leave a comment:
-
Re: Albert Pujols Louisville order question (2002-2003)
Every Maple bat I have ever had that was used, had seam marks. All of those ink transfers look just like the other CSI bats that I have seen. I will not purchase a bat that came from them. With all of those ink transfers their should be some seam marks.Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: