Why isn't Steve Garvey in the HOF?

[legaleagle92481]

Re: Why isn't Steve Garvey in the HOF?

most of the time it's more fair comparison if among other first basemen not in the HOF, like Allen, Hernandez, Mattingly, and Bagwell.

Bagwell is not yet eligible for Cooperstown it will be interesting to see if he gets in. Throughout his career he was often talked about as a future HOfer. Another interesting guy is McGriff he had over 490 homers and did not get in on his first try.

[MJB14]

Re: Why isn't Steve Garvey in the HOF?

You make some good points. Here are my responses:



6. I don't agree Rice was the premier player of his era, as Robin Yount and George Brett were much, much better and were elected to the Hall in 1999. Rice waited until 10 years later.

Rice not being a premier player in his era?

From 1975 to 1986, Rice led the AL in total games played, at bats, runs scored, hits, homers, RBIs, slugging average, total bases, extra base hits, go-ahead RBIs, multi-hit games, and outfield assists.[3] Among all major league players during that time, Rice was the leader in five of these categories (Mike Schmidt is next, having led in four).

Rice could hit for both power and average, and currently only nine other retired players rank ahead of him in both career home runs and batting average: Hank Aaron, Jimmie Foxx, Lou Gehrig, Mickey Mantle, Willie Mays, Stan Musial, Mel Ott, Babe Ruth and Ted Williams

In addition to winning the American League MVP award in 1978, he finished in the top five in MVP voting five other times (1975, 1977, 1979, 1983, 1986).

How is that not premier?

[legaleagle92481]

Re: Why isn't Steve Garvey in the HOF?

Alot of players one can argue are HOF worthy. For example look at Bernie Williams won four gold gloves playing a premiumn defensive position. He had more homers than Garvey, a higher ba, 51 less rbis than Garvey with the same amount of 100 rbi seasons, several all star games, 6 world series winning four and he played more than 200 games less than Garvey.

[joelsabi]

Re: Why isn't Steve Garvey in the HOF?

You make some good points. Here are my responses:

1. "...it is rare for a player who did not play in the dead ball era to get in with so few homers and for a first baseman it is unheard of.." True, but Garvey topped your example, Keith Hernandez, by 110 in HRs. And he didn't play in a ballpark like Fenway to help him out, as Rice did.

2. Ozzie and Brooks may be the best to ever play at their positions, Brooks for certain, so comparing to that standard is about impossible for anyone. But a 4-time gold-glove first baseman should top an average left-fielder like Rice, I would think.

3. Agreed, one MVP isn't a huge deal by itself. But Rice only won it once as well, same with Sandberg.

4. Garvey made 10 all-star teams (same for Sandberg.) Again, by itself, not a deal-closer, but I'd expect a HOFer to be a perennial All-Star, and he qualifies in that respect. Rice, in comparison, only played in 7.

5. You're resorting to a basketball example here, perhaps because the other players we're comparing Garvey to either never played in a World Series (Sandberg,) or lost the only one they were in (Rice.) Hernandez, with his extremely weak HR total of 162, with only 2182 hits, is out of contention in my opinion. Garvey played in 5, and hit .419 in helping his team to the WS title in 1981.

6. I'll concede Sandberg as being one of the top guys at his position. I don't agree Rice was the premier player of his era, as Robin Yount and George Brett were much, much better and were elected to the Hall in 1999. Rice waited until 10 years later.

I'm not saying Garvey should be in.... I'm just curious about the reasoning why he isn't.


Jim Rice, Steve Garvey, Ryne Sandberg, Keith Hernandez stats:

G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS AVG
2089 8225 1249 2452 373 79 382 1451 670 1423 58 34 .298
2332 8835 1143 2599 440 43 272 1308 479 1003 83 62 .294
2164 8385 1318 2386 403 76 282 1061 761 1260 44 107 .285
2088 7370 1124 2182 426 60 162 1071 1070 1012 98 63 .296

most of the time it's more fair comparison if among other first basemen not in the HOF, like Allen, Hernandez, Mattingly, and Bagwell.

[Mark17]

Re: Why isn't Steve Garvey in the HOF?

Reasons he is not in from a purely on the field perspective:

1. He is a first baseman with under 300 homers who played nearly two decades. Outside of middle infield positions it is rare for a player who did not play in the dead ball era to get in with so few homers and for a first baseman it is unheard of. Plus five 100 rbi seasons is nothing special for a first baseman. 2599 hits is alot but would still have taken him three solid years to get to 3000. A .294 BA is very good but for instance Keith Hernadez hit .296 and he is not in the hall either.

2. Defense at first base does not hold the weight it does at other positions. I.e. Ozzie Smith at shortstop, Brooks Robinson at third base. To use this example again Keith Hernadez was also a tremendous first baseman who won nine or ten gold gloves and he has not sniffed the Hall either.

3. One mvp does not do that much for a hof case. Hernadez won one also. Jeff Burroughs won one so did Sal Bando, Don Mattingly and Canseco.

4. Allstar appearances mean very little as players are not always chosen on merit or a specfic position is just weak for a few years. Alot of many time allstars are not in. Silver slugger awards a much greater measure of a hitter's greatness and he won zero.

5. Winning a world series is impressive but a hofer it does not make. Look at the NBA Robert Horry contributed to many titles often huge game turning lays but is not a HOFer. Hernadez won two series' Garvey only won one as well.

6. Rice was regarded as the premier player of his era and Sandberg was a power hitting, slick fielding secobd baseman the likes of which the game had never seen so those are poor comparisions.

You make some good points. Here are my responses:

1. "...it is rare for a player who did not play in the dead ball era to get in with so few homers and for a first baseman it is unheard of.." True, but Garvey topped your example, Keith Hernandez, by 110 in HRs. And he didn't play in a ballpark like Fenway to help him out, as Rice did.

2. Ozzie and Brooks may be the best to ever play at their positions, Brooks for certain, so comparing to that standard is about impossible for anyone. But a 4-time gold-glove first baseman should top an average left-fielder like Rice, I would think.

3. Agreed, one MVP isn't a huge deal by itself. But Rice only won it once as well, same with Sandberg.

4. Garvey made 10 all-star teams (same for Sandberg.) Again, by itself, not a deal-closer, but I'd expect a HOFer to be a perennial All-Star, and he qualifies in that respect. Rice, in comparison, only played in 7.

5. You're resorting to a basketball example here, perhaps because the other players we're comparing Garvey to either never played in a World Series (Sandberg,) or lost the only one they were in (Rice.) Hernandez, with his extremely weak HR total of 162, with only 2182 hits, is out of contention in my opinion. Garvey played in 5, and hit .419 in helping his team to the WS title in 1981.

6. I'll concede Sandberg as being one of the top guys at his position. I don't agree Rice was the premier player of his era, as Robin Yount and George Brett were much, much better and were elected to the Hall in 1999. Rice waited until 10 years later.

I'm not saying Garvey should be in.... I'm just curious about the reasoning why he isn't.


Jim Rice, Steve Garvey, Ryne Sandberg, Keith Hernandez stats:

G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS AVG
2089 8225 1249 2452 373 79 382 1451 670 1423 58 34 .298
2332 8835 1143 2599 440 43 272 1308 479 1003 83 62 .294
2164 8385 1318 2386 403 76 282 1061 761 1260 44 107 .285
2088 7370 1124 2182 426 60 162 1071 1070 1012 98 63 .296

[legaleagle92481]

Re: Why isn't Steve Garvey in the HOF?

Reasons he is not in from a purely on the field perspective:

1. He is a first baseman with under 300 homers who played nearly two decades. Outside of middle infield positions it is rare for a player who did not play in the dead ball era to get in with so few homers and for a first baseman it is unheard of. Plus five 100 rbi seasons is nothing special for a first baseman. 2599 hits is alot but would still have taken him three solid years to get to 3000. A .294 BA is very good but for instance Keith Hernadez hit .296 and he is not in the hall either.

2. Defense at first base does not hold the weight it does at other positions. I.e. Ozzie Smith at shortstop, Brooks Robinson at third base. To use this example again Keith Hernadez was also a tremendous first baseman who won nine or ten gold gloves and he has not sniffed the Hall either.

3. One mvp does not do that much for a hof case. Hernadez won one also. Jeff Burroughs won one so did Sal Bando, Don Mattingly and Canseco.

4. Allstar appearances mean very little as players are not always chosen on merit or a specfic position is just weak for a few years. Alot of many time allstars are not in. Silver slugger awards a much greater measure of a hitter's greatness and he won zero.

5. Winning a world series is impressive but a hofer it does not make. Look at the NBA Robert Horry contributed to many titles often huge game turning lays but is not a HOFer. Hernadez won two series' Garvey only won one as well.

6. Rice was regarded as the premier player of his era and Sandberg was a power hitting, slick fielding secobd baseman the likes of which the game had never seen so those are poor comparisions.

[sox83cubs84]

Re: Why isn't Steve Garvey in the HOF?

I really don't care for the guy...when he went free agent after 1982, he feigned interest in joining the Cubs. He never was serious about coming to Chicago...he just wanted to create a competitior (one he never truly would be signing with) to bleed a few extra dollars out of San Diego. I hope he NEVER makes it!

Dave Miedema
Chicago area
Steve Garvey is NOT my Padre!

[cjclong]

Re: Why isn't Steve Garvey in the HOF?

I think the number speak for themselves. Garvey was a very good player but most people don't think he deserves the HOF. Less than a .300 average and less than 300 home runs. Tommy Henrich who played with the Yankees during the Joe DiMaggio eara and was called "old relieable" and is not in the HOF had what were similar numbers for his time. If we put every good player who was an All Star at one time in the Hall we would have to triple the size of the building and inducting 20 players every year. You see arguments of people who want Don Mattingly and others. A person can be an excellent player and an All Star and not merit that very top group that belongs in the HOF.

[bscott]

Re: Why isn't Steve Garvey in the HOF?

It may have something to do with this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rD9eYpcIl88

or this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-84YsYrAxc

Videotape doesn't lie.


-bscott

[Mark17]

Throughout his playing career, I always assumed Garvey was a Hall of Fame player. He won many Gold Gloves, was MVP twice, won a World Series and played in four others, hit the big home run to give the Padres a pennant (over the Cubs,) and was easily on the All Star team year after year.

He finished with 2,599 hits and a .294 average, plus 272 home runs. Six times he had 200 or more hits, and five times over 100 RBI.

Clutch:
Division Series average (1981): .368
League Championship average (5 of them): .356
World Series average (5 of them): .319
All Star Games (10 of them): .393

I know it's weak to compare guys to players in the lower rungs of the Hall For example, look at Joe Tinker and his 600+ errors and .262 average for a 15-year career. You can make an argument for almost any 15-year shortstop compared to that.

But when you look at Garvey next to Jim Rice and Ryne Sandberg, two recent inductees, what am I missing?