103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

[notxpensv4u]

Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

Sadly we as baseball fans are punished....The great baseball players of our time possibly could have went down as the best of ALL time now will have a cloud hanging over them.AROD and Bonds had talents beyond any current talents and that was just not good enough. I feel for the players who never made it to the majors who never used steroids and never saw the majors because of there morals.

[Rboitano]

Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

I highly doubt Pujols ever used anything. If you throw him in then why not Manny?

[yanks12025]

Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

Rboitano,
If you looked you would see that me and the other person who listed Pujols had also listed Manny.

[3arod13]

Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

How about Brady Anderson??? That guy from the O's.....

Hit 50 HR's in 1996. Next highest in his career was 24 in in 1999.

[otismalibu]

Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

Lance Armstrong.

[Mr.3000]

Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

Lance Armstrong.

What position does he play and who drafted him?

[notxpensv4u]

Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

Luis Gonzalez 57 homeruns in 2001
and who could forget the power hitter
Shawn Green 49 Homeruns in 2001
followed by
Todd Helton 49 homeruns in 2001
all who seemed to go into history as power hitters?

[Lokee]

Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

Albert (don't call me Joey) Belle.

[chakes89]

Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

If Corey Patterson was jucing, he obviously wasn't doing something right

[5kRunner]

Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

If Corey Patterson was jucing, he obviously wasn't doing something right

My thoughts exactly.

I don't think Frank Thomas juiced. Wasn't he one of the players pushing for testing before the league even discussed it?

[spartakid]

Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

My thoughts exactly.

I don't think Frank Thomas juiced. Wasn't he one of the players pushing for testing before the league even discussed it?

It's a brilliant cover-up, reverse psychology JK

[gingi79]

Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

I'll give you a better question, what player would you be most disappointed in if they used performance enhancers?

I'd go with John Smoltz, Greg Maddux, Tom Glavine and Chipper Jones.

If any of these 4 come up with a positive, I'd done with baseball. I don't mean it as a knee jerk reaction, I mean Baseball will no longer exist to me. If you see their names, everything I have will suddenly be for sale and cheap. (I am sure some people are no anxiously awaiting these positives lol)

I would laugh the hardest if David Eckstein came up positive. I'd believe the San Diego Chicken used steroids purchased from the Philly Phanatic first.

[notxpensv4u]

Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

The most disappointed player I would be upset with would be Cal Ripken Jr. If he ever tested positive it would be a sad day for baseball. Also has anyone brought up the fact in the news it seems kinda funny that las week the heat was on Barry Bonds and his use. Why out of the blue AROD's name is brought up. Why not wait until the regular season? Don't forget Bonds trial is March 2nd.

[arl423]

Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

I would be most dissapointed to find out that Albert Pujols, Nolan Ryan or Cal Ripken Jr used. Along with a few others but those would be my top 3.

[OaklandAsFan]

Re: 103 not named that tested positive for steroids...

sheff already admitted to using at the least HGH in an SI article when he was working out with Bonds (good read if you want to see how wacked out Barroid really is)

I HIGHLY doubt Frank Thomas ever used steroids.