Pete Rose possible reinstatement..

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 33bird
    Banned
    • Nov 2005
    • 1925

    Pete Rose possible reinstatement..

    I always thought that Selig would tackle the reinstatement of Rose in 2009. Why? 20 years since the banishment was handed down. Isn't 20 years long enough? Anyway, it's been reported Selig is looking at it once again, and Hank Aaron said Rose should be in the HOF this weekend. I think the Hammer being in support of Rose being in the HOF will really help the cause. I know Rose has handled all of this terrible in the last 20 years but the worst thing he did was bet on HIS REDS to win. I don't believe that is an unforgivable sin. I think 20 years out of the game covers that sin. If he had bet against his team then I'd be in support of never letting him back in, but he did not do that. I know there are a few HOFs that don't like it. Feller and some others, but I think the majority feel he should in-just like Aaron. I'd also like to see him back on the bench. I'm sure the same mistakes would never happen again. Just my 2 cents.
  • joelsabi
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2005
    • 3073

    #2
    Re: Pete Rose possible reinstatement..

    How about Shoeless Joe Jackson

    Regards,
    Joel S.
    joelsabi @ gmail.com
    Wanted: Alex Rodriguez Game Used Items and other unique artifacts, 1992 thru 1998 only. From High School to Early Mariners.

    Comment

    • rj_lucas
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2009
      • 489

      #3
      Re: Pete Rose possible reinstatement..

      Selig confirmed at the All-Star Game press conference that the Joe Jackson file is under review. The transcript of the press conference can be found here (the JJ question is about 2/3 of the way down):

      ASAPSports FastScripts, a system using state-of-the-art technology created to produce verbatim FastScripts of press conferences and player/team interviews at sporting events around the globe.


      Of course, he said the same thing in 1999, so don't hold your breath. From the Washington Post, May 29, 1999:

      "Baseball Commissioner Bud Selig is "reviewing the entire file" of banned baseball legend Shoeless Joe Jackson, Sen. Tom Harkin (D- Iowa) said yesterday.

      Harkin wrote to Selig in March, asking the commissioner to reinstate Jackson to baseball, a move that would make him eligible for the Hall of Fame."

      Selig has made it known that he'll be stepping down sooner rather than later, so perhaps he'll reinstate Rose and Jackson as one of his last official acts to go out on a high note.

      Rick
      rickjlucas@gmail.com

      Comment

      • justinwc80
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2009
        • 492

        #4
        Re: Pete Rose possible reinstatement..

        Its time! He is an alltime great that should be in the hall. Its not a hall of morality, its a hall of fame.

        Comment

        • rj_lucas
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2009
          • 489

          #5
          Re: Pete Rose possible reinstatement..

          Sorry, one additional thought. There is a precedent for reinstating Rose.

          People forget that Bowie Kuhn banned Mickey Mantle and Willie Mays from baseball for their ties to a Las Vegas casino, and this was AFTER they had been inducted in the Hall of Fame.

          Mantle and Mays were later reinstated by Peter Ueberroth.

          Rick
          rickjlucas@gmail.com

          Comment

          • joelsabi
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2005
            • 3073

            #6
            Re: Pete Rose possible reinstatement..

            Originally posted by 33bird
            I always thought that Selig would tackle the reinstatement of Rose in 2009. Why? 20 years since the banishment was handed down. Isn't 20 years long enough? Anyway, it's been reported Selig is looking at it once again, and Hank Aaron said Rose should be in the HOF this weekend. I think the Hammer being in support of Rose being in the HOF will really help the cause. I know Rose has handled all of this terrible in the last 20 years but the worst thing he did was bet on HIS REDS to win. I don't believe that is an unforgivable sin. I think 20 years out of the game covers that sin. If he had bet against his team then I'd be in support of never letting him back in, but he did not do that. I know there are a few HOFs that don't like it. Feller and some others, but I think the majority feel he should in-just like Aaron. I'd also like to see him back on the bench. I'm sure the same mistakes would never happen again. Just my 2 cents.


            sorry looks like i am side tracking your thread with my post of Joe Jackson but I think if they want to relook at Rose they should do the same for Joe Jackson.
            Regards,
            Joel S.
            joelsabi @ gmail.com
            Wanted: Alex Rodriguez Game Used Items and other unique artifacts, 1992 thru 1998 only. From High School to Early Mariners.

            Comment

            • brianborsch
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2005
              • 1704

              #7
              Re: Pete Rose possible reinstatement..

              If Rose gets in then they HAVE to allow Joe Jackson. Joe Jackson was found not guilty in a court of law for God's sake! We can't say the same for Pete Rose.

              Not to mention that a person's sentence is over when they die. That's how the prison system has always done it. So why is Joe Jackson's sentence still going on? Landis was a pompous a-hole and Joe Jackson was the sacrificial lamb of baseball in the 20's.

              Comment

              • 33bird
                Banned
                • Nov 2005
                • 1925

                #8
                Re: Pete Rose possible reinstatement..

                The only thing Pete was ever convicted of was tax evasion. The debate I've heard against Shoeless Joe-is go look at the numbers. They aren't great because he didn't play long enough.

                Comment

                • brianborsch
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2005
                  • 1704

                  #9
                  Re: Pete Rose possible reinstatement..

                  His numbers are better than a few HOFers. Take Hack Wilson for example. He played 13 seasons, batted .356 with an OBP of .423 and a SLG of .517! He has practically 1800 hits! That's enough to get in. The hold up was that he was banned by the idiot commisioner at the time Mountain Landis. Besides his lower numbers, he should be allowed in simply because he was wrongly convicted and wrongly withheld from finishing his career. We all know that if he was allowed to finish his career, he would have dwarfed some of these other HOFers easy. Anyways, we'll see where it falls.

                  Comment

                  • sylbry
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2005
                    • 936

                    #10
                    Re: Pete Rose possible reinstatement..

                    Originally posted by brianborsch
                    Landis was a pompous a-hole and Joe Jackson was the sacrificial lamb of baseball in the 20's.
                    Amen!

                    Although I think the legend of Shoeless Joe Jackson is greater than Hall of Famer Shoeless Joe Jackson. Shoeless Joe is like Babe Ruth's called shot. It is a story that should never conclude.
                    Wanted: Minnesota Twins throwback or special event jerseys.

                    Comment

                    • skinsfan0521
                      Senior Member
                      • Apr 2009
                      • 397

                      #11
                      Re: Pete Rose possible reinstatement..

                      Originally posted by brianborsch
                      His numbers are better than a few HOFers. Take Hack Wilson for example. He played 13 seasons, batted .356 with an OBP of .423 and a SLG of .517! He has practically 1800 hits! That's enough to get in. The hold up was that he was banned by the idiot commisioner at the time Mountain Landis. Besides his lower numbers, he should be allowed in simply because he was wrongly convicted and wrongly withheld from finishing his career. We all know that if he was allowed to finish his career, he would have dwarfed some of these other HOFers easy. Anyways, we'll see where it falls.
                      I'm not going to pretend to know anything about how good Shoeless Joe was or debate if he should get in or not...

                      What I will debate though is your comment about how if he were allowed to finish his career, he would have dwarfed other HOF numbers... people were saying the same things about Ken Griffey Jr., Bo Jackson, Barry Sanders, etc. How they were going to crush all the numbers and records and it wasn't even going to be a contest. Well, lots of other things can happen during a career that can derail the putting up of extreme numbers.

                      Again, I have no idea what kind of talent or numbers Shoeless Joe had when he was playing, but you shouldn't just put somebody in based purely on their potential.

                      Imagine all the people who could be put in on potential...

                      Just my .02

                      -Brian

                      Comment

                      • skyking26
                        Senior Member
                        • Dec 2005
                        • 2457

                        #12
                        Re: Pete Rose possible reinstatement..

                        Rose made the gambling mistakes we are all aware of, and made it worse by lying about them for so many years. However, I think 20 years is punishment enough. We all know the integrity of the game is suspect with roids, etc., so let Rose in... He's the hit KING.

                        RK
                        ROBERT KOPPEL
                        Skyking26 - 35 year collector of Dave Kingman memorabilia. Also seek 500 HR and 3000 Hit GU Bats,
                        and 1968, 1984, HOF Tigers GU Bats...Skyking442@hotmail.com

                        Comment

                        • staindsox
                          Senior Member
                          • Jun 2006
                          • 777

                          #13
                          Re: Pete Rose possible reinstatement..

                          I think baseball needs to Rose out. We are already dealing with one cancer (PEDs). We don't need to invite a second problem back in. People are missing the big picture on this issue. Re-instating him doesn't just mean being eligible for the Hall. It also means he can be on the field again. I heard an interview where he said he wants to coach again. We also know he is still gambling. If any team would be stupid enough to give him a chance, he would only end up doing the same damn thing again.

                          As if that weren't enough, the fact that he is selling these baseballs tells me his "apology" is less than sincere.

                          He is a cancer and is where he belongs...on the outside.

                          Chris

                          Always looking for Jack Hannahan or St. Paul Saints gamers:

                          www.jackhannahan.webs.com

                          Comment

                          • staindsox
                            Senior Member
                            • Jun 2006
                            • 777

                            #14
                            Re: Pete Rose possible reinstatement..

                            He is also selling t-shirts and hoodies on his site. Good thing he apolgized.

                            The only thing he is sorry about is that he got caught.

                            Always looking for Jack Hannahan or St. Paul Saints gamers:

                            www.jackhannahan.webs.com

                            Comment

                            • 33bird
                              Banned
                              • Nov 2005
                              • 1925

                              #15
                              Re: Pete Rose possible reinstatement..

                              Yea, I agree with some of what was said. I don't think Pete has ever felt bad about anything except how it all affected his nice life. But, I'm not saying he should manage again. In fact, it looks like he'd have to agree not to manage. I think that's only fair. Let him be a hitting coach or bench coach or announcer. That would be much better than seeing him sign at the forum mall 3 days a week.

                              Comment

                              Working...