Results 1 to 10 of 22
Thread: Newest Met Mystery
Hybrid View
-
08-13-2009, 12:56 PM #1
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 1,501
Newest Met Mystery
During my daily search for G/U Met jackets I came across this offering:
http://cgi.ebay.com/1986-Keith-Mille...d=p3286.c0.m14
A game worn 1986 Starter Keith Miller jacket.
Keith Miller wore #25 throughout his Met career. Even #25 in some Spring Training photos. There's been three Mets,including coaches who ever wore #58 none named miller(kind of low,only three)most notable is Sandy Alomar Jr
Of all the players who's last name is Miller and there are five, none ever wore #58. So indeed another Met mystery.
I'm guessing Miller was given this in Spring Training '85,'86 ? He never played for the 1986 Mets by the way(Mets debut 6-16-1987) so ST jacket?
I emailed Zane and I'm guessing he's on vacation. I'm surprised to find he's not a member of this forum(member search) I thought he was(unless under a different name).
-
08-13-2009, 01:19 PM #2
Re: Newest Met Mystery
Looking for ...
Any Game Used Mets jerseys from 1986 and 1987
Any Keith Hernandez, Ron Darling, Lee Mazzilli and John Olerud Mets items
Email me at TNT_Toys@yahoo.com
-
08-13-2009, 02:04 PM #3
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 1,182
Re: Newest Met Mystery
Perhaps I am way off base here but I purchased a on-field authentic Oakland A's jacket from Gerry Cosby in 1988 and had McGwire sewn onto the back.
Is it possible that some guy named Joe "Schmoe" Miller who wears #58 in his Softball Beer League wanted to do the same thing with a Mets jacket?
I am in no way accusing anyone of misrepresentation, I'm speaking hypothetically.
By the way, the A's jacket was stolen from me when I was at college in 1998. If anyone ever sees it for sale, I am offering a reward and the current owner will be arrested. Just an FYI
-
08-13-2009, 03:03 PM #4
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 1,501
Re: Newest Met Mystery
I collect the Starter Met jackets (Name on Back)because its virtually impossible to fake them. And there unique. This is probably a ST jacket. But at $500? That was probably a nod to the '86 team. But not enough homework by the seller. I just acquired a Mike Marshall Met heavy Starter jacket and short sleeve batting practice pull over both have numbers and names on back signed letters from Marshall totall was $400 both. The David West heavy jacket went for under $100. So,$500 +shipping for "Miller"?
If you are set to press charges against the current owner of the McGwire jacket maybe you won't get a response as fast as if you target who sold it to him. Unless the thief still has it. And I doubt that.
-
08-13-2009, 03:32 PM #5
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Posts
- 8,901
Re: Newest Met Mystery
It doesn't look to be from 1987 ST, as Street & Smith's shows Keith Miller as #62 that spring.
Dave M.
-
08-13-2009, 04:28 PM #6
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 1,501
Re: Newest Met Mystery
Dave M. Thank you. So not just #25 in spring training. He signed as a amateur w/Mets in Sept 84 So it possible in '85 or '86 ST he wore #58. Did they issue long sleeve jackets in spring training anyway?With name on back to single A amatuer league players for their less than a month stay before being shipped back to 1985 A-Lynchburg and then 1986-Jackson? I'm doubting that.
here's a ST photo with #6,so another number(and to answer my own question as to the need for jackets in ST-long sleeves in Florida).