e-bay deal question

[Lokee]

Re: e-bay deal question

from what I can see it is either

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=250428435617&viewitem=&category=60596&salenotsupported

OR

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=250433723273&viewitem=&category=60596&salenotsupported

Since one is the 27th and one is the 28th

Thank you Terapeak

[earlywynnfan]

Re: e-bay deal question

How does someone sell the same bat 2 days in a row?

Ken
earlywynnfan5@hotmail.com

[Vintagedeputy]

Re: e-bay deal question

wow! how much does someone really have to suck at selling on ebay to have a 71% rating!

dont go into a sales career!

[justinlm24]

Re: e-bay deal question

If you'll read my earlier post, I accidentally sent a 2nd chance offer for the $311. Which was refuded immediately. The high bidder had already paid.

You guys can sit here and pass judgement all you want. But you do not know the situation. I got two bogus negatives, both on the same item. I am working to have both removed. One in which says PSA denied authentication. Yet I just got an e-mail from Taube last night that he will authenticate the bat. So that there is so untrue and andfair it's ridiculous. Like I told the buyer. I don't use e-bay often, nor do I plan on ever using it again after all this crap. It's not even worth it. Not to mention I paid over $80 in fees to sell one item. That's just absurd.

So to any of you who want to sit here and make you comments, come say them to me. If I was a shady person why would I even bother to start this thread? So again...get the FACTS before you pass judgement. Thanks....

[vonbrandingo]

Re: e-bay deal question

If you'll read my earlier post, I accidentally sent a 2nd chance offer for the $311. Which was refuded immediately. The high bidder had already paid.

You guys can sit here and pass judgement all you want. But you do not know the situation. I got two bogus negatives, both on the same item. I am working to have both removed. One in which says PSA denied authentication. Yet I just got an e-mail from Taube last night that he will authenticate the bat. So that there is so untrue and andfair it's ridiculous. Like I told the buyer. I don't use e-bay often, nor do I plan on ever using it again after all this crap. It's not even worth it. Not to mention I paid over $80 in fees to sell one item. That's just absurd.

So to any of you who want to sit here and make you comments, come say them to me. If I was a shady person why would I even bother to start this thread? So again...get the FACTS before you pass judgement. Thanks....

I think members thought you were not participating in the thread anymore, otherwise comments would have been said to you. Facts were posted but not all of them by you and that is why members wanted to see the auction link and Taube's exact response. Good to see that more has come to light.

Is Taube authenticating the bat as game used by Pujols or just used by Pujols without confirming game use? He can now attribute all the use to Pujols and not some to another player as well or did he find out the other player that used the bat? If he can attribute use to Pujols only, I'd be interested in finding out why he changed his decision and curious about what you said to change his mind.

I'd think the buyer of this bat would want to keep the bat & not seek a refund and revise his/her feedback left for you after this news if the bat is Pujols authentic game used. Good luck with that!

[marknmd]

Re: e-bay deal question

You're obligated to the text in your listing.

Seems to me if you're making a claim that the bat was game used, but you're not offering proof, and the buyer purchases same and acknowledges delivery, the buyer is obligated to find the proof that the item is NOT game used, if he wants to make a case. In other words, the buyer must find a reputable source to certify that the item is NOT game used.

Otherwise, he has no grounds to return the item and expect a refund - unless you have a item return policy in your listing.