Horrendous Mattingly Jersey

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • sox83cubs84
    replied
    Re: Horrendous Mattingly Jersey

    Originally posted by platinum1
    I love how they use a camera phone to take pictures of the stuff they have for auction.
    It could be worse...the seller could set the items on the toilet to photgraph 'em.

    Dave Miedema

    Leave a comment:


  • bronx_burner
    replied
    Re: Horrendous Mattingly Jersey

    Found this photo of Steve Balboni while he was playing for Ft. Lauderdale. Seems to be a perfect style match for that #4 jersey.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • suave1477
    replied
    Re: Horrendous Mattingly Jersey

    Thats intersting that the Yankees would retire #4 for jus the Major League club and not the others. I know the Mets have retired numbers for the Major clubs and have done so for the Single A club.

    Leave a comment:


  • platinum1
    replied
    Re: Horrendous Mattingly Jersey

    Originally posted by DonFan23
    This one's so bad that it's quicker to state what's right with it than all that's wrong:

    1. It's grey.

    http://tinyurl.com/2fl9gwa
    I love how they use a camera phone to take pictures of the stuff they have for auction.

    Leave a comment:


  • sox83cubs84
    replied
    Re: Horrendous Mattingly Jersey

    Originally posted by bronx_burner
    Definitely not organization wide. I know the AAA Scranton Yankees issues 4 each year. Eric Bruntlett wore it this year. I can't seem to find a photo of any Ft. Launderdale Yankees road jerseys but that does seem familiar and possibly could be correct even with the 4. But I certainly don't know for sure. The Mattingly is a disaster though.
    Kinda like Ernie Banks' #14 for the Cubs...retired at Wrigley Field but used in the minors and even the Arizona Fall League (Eric Hinske wore #14 in the AFL as a Cub 10 years ago.)

    Leave a comment:


  • bronx_burner
    replied
    Re: Horrendous Mattingly Jersey

    Definitely not organization wide. I know the AAA Scranton Yankees issues 4 each year. Eric Bruntlett wore it this year. I can't seem to find a photo of any Ft. Launderdale Yankees road jerseys but that does seem familiar and possibly could be correct even with the 4. But I certainly don't know for sure. The Mattingly is a disaster though.

    Leave a comment:


  • DonFan23
    replied
    Re: Horrendous Mattingly Jersey

    Originally posted by suave1477
    DonFan, Yankees retired #4 throughout the orginaztion in 1939

    I would be shocled if they let one slide by in the 80's.

    But hey as I learn everyday anything is possible
    I didn't see the back at first glance. Comment was related to the front, but I do agree with the number issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • suave1477
    replied
    Re: Horrendous Mattingly Jersey

    DonFan, Yankees retired #4 throughout the orginaztion in 1939

    I would be shocled if they let one slide by in the 80's.

    But hey as I learn everyday anything is possible

    Leave a comment:


  • DonFan23
    replied
    Re: Horrendous Mattingly Jersey

    Originally posted by suave1477
    Do you think thats worse than this one?

    At least this one has a cheap buy it now lol

    http://cgi.ebay.com/New-York-Yankees...item35aac6ee80
    Jason,

    Actually the one you linked isn't as bad as you think. I'm not as familiar with the Ft Lauderdale & Tampa Yankees jerseys from those days, but the one you linked does resemble jerseys used by the Oneonta Yankees in the late 70's/early 80's.

    R.J.

    Leave a comment:


  • DonFan23
    replied
    Re: Horrendous Mattingly Jersey

    Originally posted by Tallyman77
    Hi R.J........if you would please educate me a bit and indicate what all you see wrong with the Mattingly jersey. Thanks!

    -Walt

    Evergreen7777@att.net
    Walt - see Dave's post above. Steer clear of this one.

    Leave a comment:


  • sox83cubs84
    replied
    Re: Horrendous Mattingly Jersey

    HIDEOUS!! Thre name should be in the collar (along with a year and set number), the Wilson tag should be in the tail, Mattingly wore a size 42 then, and the NEW YORK front font isn't even close. Only at Coach's Corner!!

    Dave Miedema

    Leave a comment:


  • Tallyman77
    replied
    Re: Horrendous Mattingly Jersey

    Hi R.J........if you would please educate me a bit and indicate what all you see wrong with the Mattingly jersey. Thanks!

    -Walt

    Evergreen7777@att.net

    Leave a comment:


  • BULBUS
    replied
    Re: Horrendous Mattingly Jersey

    RJ, that one is pretty bad. Don't understand how an auction house could put garbage like that up on their site.

    Heres one on ebay:


    I have seen a few of these retail jerseys with the "Mattingly 92" tag. They are all signed with the same style Mattingly signature. Someone must have made these up for a signing, now people are trying to sell them as used/issued jerseys

    Leave a comment:


  • suave1477
    replied
    Re: Horrendous Mattingly Jersey

    Do you think thats worse than this one?

    At least this one has a cheap buy it now lol

    Leave a comment:


  • DonFan23
    started a topic Horrendous Mattingly Jersey

    Horrendous Mattingly Jersey

    This one's so bad that it's quicker to state what's right with it than all that's wrong:

    1. It's grey.

    This well used road grey has his name on a tag stitched down the front inside, is tagged as his size 46 by Wilson in the collar, and shows great MLB usage from "Donnie Baseball". It is a gem, trimmed in blue and white team colors, and with his #23 as well as "New York" sewn front and back. Wow...All the right markings are here, and value is $2000.00 or so. Near impossible to find!
Working...