Authenticity Opinions on this Jeter ball

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • spartanservitto
    replied
    Re: Authenticity Opinions on this Jeter ball

    Here is one I got at the stadium - the point is , his autograph varies but there are consistencies - I have 3-4 baseballs I gly
    In person and I would be 100% satisfied buying that ball as authentic.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • spartanservitto
    replied
    Re: Authenticity Opinions on this Jeter ball

    Here is one I got at the team bus.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • spartanservitto
    replied
    Re: Authenticity Opinions on this Jeter ball

    Here is one I got at a restaurant near the old ritz in Dearborn when I was 17-18.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • spartanservitto
    replied
    Re: Authenticity Opinions on this Jeter ball

    The ball is 100 percent real. I have got him so many times - it's pretty easy to spot a fake.

    Leave a comment:


  • yankees506
    replied
    Re: Authenticity Opinions on this Jeter ball

    Sorry meant op ball is a solid forgery

    Leave a comment:


  • yankees506
    replied
    Re: Authenticity Opinions on this Jeter ball

    Originally posted by Griffey24fan
    He is really not as inconsistent as most think, he tends to have the same known characteristics for most autographs. That eBay auction Steiner or not is consistent with his signature and fine.
    I respectfully disagree. Auto is a solid fake

    Leave a comment:


  • Griffey24fan
    replied
    Re: Authenticity Opinions on this Jeter ball

    Originally posted by johnsontravis@ymail.com
    I wouldn't be very comfortable buying that baseball. It could be real or it could easily be fake. To anyone saying it is surely fake I want you to go to the link below and tell me if you saw that ball without any authentication if you would call it legit? Derek Jeter is extremely inconsistent because of his scribble filled signature.

    http://m.ebay.com/itm/181639881163

    He is really not as inconsistent as most think, he tends to have the same known characteristics for most autographs. That eBay auction Steiner or not is consistent with his signature and fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • 3arod13
    replied
    Re: Authenticity Opinions on this Jeter ball

    Originally posted by Skizzick
    I wasn't pointing out your opinion specifically, but saying somethings is "definitely real" or "100%" on any item is an exaggeration, especally when not seeing it in person. Even PSA/DNA, JSA, etc. only say something is "likely authentic" without witnessing the signing of the item themselves.
    Sorry for coming across that way. I probably should have just made the comment, without highlighting your comment.

    I agree with you. However, didn't see him sign it, but I can say that is his signature. 100% guaranteed in my mind (lol)

    Leave a comment:


  • Skizzick
    replied
    Re: Authenticity Opinions on this Jeter ball

    Originally posted by 3arod13
    Opinion was asked, and my response was "signature is solid," and that was just my opinion. I can say that the signature is a really nice Jeter signature, and I don't see any flaws in it whatsoever! So if it is fake, the person who signed it is really good!
    I wasn't pointing out your opinion specifically, but saying somethings is "definitely real" or "100%" on any item is an exaggeration, especally when not seeing it in person. Even PSA/DNA, JSA, etc. only say something is "likely authentic" without witnessing the signing of the item themselves.

    Leave a comment:


  • 3arod13
    replied
    Re: Authenticity Opinions on this Jeter ball

    Originally posted by Skizzick
    A lot of you have confidence in a ball featuring one of the most forged signatures in the hobby that you didn't see Jeter sign in person. You say it's 100% real? Wow, you guys must have ESP or something.
    Opinion was asked, and my response was "signature is solid," and that was just my opinion. I can say that the signature is a really nice Jeter signature, and I don't see any flaws in it whatsoever! So if it is fake, the person who signed it is really good!

    Leave a comment:


  • Skizzick
    replied
    Re: Authenticity Opinions on this Jeter ball

    A lot of you have confidence in a ball featuring one of the most forged signatures in the hobby that you didn't see Jeter sign in person. You say it's 100% real? Wow, you guys must have ESP or something.

    Leave a comment:


  • johnsontravis@ymail.com
    replied
    Re: Authenticity Opinions on this Jeter ball

    I wouldn't be very comfortable buying that baseball. It could be real or it could easily be fake. To anyone saying it is surely fake I want you to go to the link below and tell me if you saw that ball without any authentication if you would call it legit? Derek Jeter is extremely inconsistent because of his scribble filled signature.

    Leave a comment:


  • Griffey24fan
    replied
    Re: Authenticity Opinions on this Jeter ball

    What are you submitting that is not passing. It is well known within the hobby that big names get rejected often unless you submit through a large sub or they feel like being generous. I have had IP stuff fail I have seen fake stuff pass.

    They won't be perfect and nobody can be unless you only keep what you get IP.

    To anyone believing this to be real, I would be interested in your examples either IP Steiner etc. that compare well with this.

    Personally it looks like the numerous fakes that bombarded eBay during his retirement season.

    Leave a comment:


  • BaseballNutz
    replied
    Re: Authenticity Opinions on this Jeter ball

    I'm a bit late to the game but that Jeter is absolutely positively 100% real and there is no question in my mind. It possesses all of the "trademark" Jeter characteristics of his signature.

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • sportsnbikes
    replied
    Re: Authenticity Opinions on this Jeter ball

    Originally posted by Griffey24fan
    99% of the time regardless of what the autograph looks like there are characteristics that are present in authentic examples. I am sure if you posted some examples of those 50 with fakes people could tell you real/fake and do quite well.
    I don't agree.

    Case in point is this Jeter. Half say it's good half say it's not. Plus if that were the case, then one would think that the 3PA's would be able to do a better job at authenticating signatures that are real. I have NEVER had a signature pass authentication even though they were all obtained by me in person. That is why I don't trust them and no longer use them.

    The bottom line is that no one ever truly knows unless they see it in person...barring a blatant bad forgery.

    Leave a comment:

Working...