Not wanting anyone to think I was picking on them, I thought that it was best that maybe I start this as a separate thread rather than replying to another’s. The jest of a forum communication between two collectors went something like this... A collector solicited opinions from other “experts†wanting to know their thoughts on a particular auction item. A reasonably well thought out response suggested that the collector do some research on the item by studying photographs, checking out tagging and comparing to Internet resources, comparing lettering/numbering to other known examples, and other items to help in making a smart decision regarding the purchase. To this, the collector replied, in essence, thanks for the advice; however, I really don’t have the time to go through all of this. Though paraphrased, and somewhat
I need a bit of a reality check here. Am I the only one who finds this attitude a bit appalling? Have we really digressed so far in the hobby that we would/could somehow allow collectors to participate in it while completely disregarding the most rudimentary of research skills? While I would certainly hope that this attitude is not typical, it does go along way in explaining the hobby’s current infatuation with the all-powerful LOA... I can’t be bothered with learning it, just put it on paper for me.
Regards,
I need a bit of a reality check here. Am I the only one who finds this attitude a bit appalling? Have we really digressed so far in the hobby that we would/could somehow allow collectors to participate in it while completely disregarding the most rudimentary of research skills? While I would certainly hope that this attitude is not typical, it does go along way in explaining the hobby’s current infatuation with the all-powerful LOA... I can’t be bothered with learning it, just put it on paper for me.
Regards,
Comment