joe di bat!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Swoboda4
    replied
    Re: joe di bat!

    Nothing more I can add except research with photos:

    Above are the bats before sanding. Which can be subtle so check carefully.
    I would be more interested in images of joe with a bat and like above are difficult to get. This bat seems not to have been sanded.

    Boning a bat. Pressing/compressing it against a bone to prevent it from cracking.
    I guess thats about it. The main thing is you made a good deal. Good luck,it was nice to see.

    Leave a comment:


  • zookerman182
    replied
    Re: joe di bat!

    You obviously got a bat for alot cheaper than it should have been sold for. If you believe its authentic no matter what anyone else says then whats the point? Its a nice bat, everyone knows its a nice bat, its even nicer now that you have cleaned the tape residue off the handle. I really dont know what more you are looking for people to tell you. You know what joe d authentic bats sold for so that should give you a nice bearing on what you could get for yours if its authentic. Sell the bat, make your "coin" and complete the flip. Trying to get every last dime of value for this already in question bat will get you nowhere. Especially if you already have a ballpark figure of what you would like for the bat. I wish you luck on your sale.

    Leave a comment:


  • momen55
    replied
    Re: joe di bat!

    that is the benefit of this forum, to get valuable info like i am asking for. the guys here know what they are talking about. thanks guys and keep the info coming!

    Leave a comment:


  • jkalathas
    replied
    Re: joe di bat!

    "i am not going to pay someone to tell me what it is when i know what it is."... so now why are you asking what it is?

    Leave a comment:


  • momen55
    replied
    Re: joe di bat!

    in talking with tim, he says it is probably an index bat. anyone else say the same, or could it be an undocumented, unrecorded or misrecorded model?
    i am expecting it to be, but if not, that's ok. i am still selling it and hope to get a decent coin for it.

    Leave a comment:


  • momen55
    replied
    Re: joe di bat!

    here is the link to that auction:http://www.huntauctions.com/online/i...=202&lot_qual=

    Leave a comment:


  • momen55
    replied
    Re: joe di bat!

    robert;
    very nice info. as for value, i don't know how much but it is worth far more than what i paid. in a november 2004 hunt auction, a 34" D29 with cracked handle repaired with nails sold for $2,300+, so i know that this one is at least that much.

    mine doesn't have any sanding marks, but doesn't mean it wasn't his either. maybe he hadn't got to it yet; maybe he gave it away, who knows.

    maybe it's one of those negro league orders?

    Leave a comment:


  • Swoboda4
    replied
    Re: joe di bat!

    Slow down in selling,you may or may not have something important.

    1- I believe the photo is from 1941.

    2- This is from an article (3/11/99)by Dave Anderson of the NY Times describing a golf incident where Joe refused to sign a bat from an old fan and then Joe discussed some important info on his bats with Anderson.

    ''Mr. DiMaggio,'' the man asked, ''will you please sign this bat?''
    ''I'm sorry,'' he said, turning toward the man. ''I don't sign bats.'
    ''But it's your bat,'' the man said. ''It's got your name on it. It's your model.'' He asked to see the bat and when the man handed it to him, he glanced at the ''Joe DiMaggio'' signature burned into the barrel, then he gripped the bat.
    ''It's got my name on it,'' he said. ''It's not my model.''


    He returned the bat. As we moved on, I mentioned that as a youngster, I had a ''Joe DiMaggio'' bat.
    ''You're right,'' I said. ''That man's bat had a thick handle. The bat I had, the handle was very thin.''
    ''And whenever I got a shipment of new bats,'' he said, ''I sand-papered the handles even thinner.''

    3. In this photo of yours there's a slight dark mark on the edge of the handle at around "1 O'clock".

    This is nonsense but this mark is bothering me because it looks similar to the mark on one the bats in my photo. As he holding the 5 bats look at the butt handle of the middle bat. The one his left forefinger is touching it also has a similar mark at "1 O'clock".


    4-Most importantly he said he sandpapered his bat handles thin!!!!!! When he grabbed the bat from the autograph seeker he wanted to see if it was one of his,meaning game used. He checked the handle for his sanding job and didn't see it. Extremely important after reading this article in now knowing DiMaggio's bat prep habit for determining game use.

    Leave a comment:


  • momen55
    replied
    Re: joe di bat!

    robert;
    what year is the photo from? i am trying to decipher this and need as much help as i can get. i need to get some estimated value so that i can sell it.
    regarding the grob article that karamaxjoe posted, i narrowed it down to possibly being from the barons order of 1/14/47.
    according to the brands on the bat that fall into that year period; centerbrand c-12, 1944-1948;
    powerized p-7, 1946-1949;
    signature bs-2.

    mike and brian;
    i need to here what your ideas are regarding this bat.

    Leave a comment:


  • Swoboda4
    replied
    Re: joe di bat!

    additional info:I had this photo made from a small picture in an old Yankee book. I made a negative and then produced an enlargement. I had joe sign it at a show in the late 80's. He told me that those were his bats and the photo was taken after one of them was stolen and then brought back. All the bats in the photo have flared handles(some with mid handle tape jobs)

    Leave a comment:


  • momen55
    replied
    Re: joe di bat!

    anyone else have input on what this bat could be? value?

    Leave a comment:


  • Swoboda4
    replied
    Re: joe di bat!

    I hope this helps.

    Robert

    Leave a comment:


  • metsbats
    replied
    Re: joe di bat!

    Originally posted by yanks12025
    Metsbats,
    I remember that Gil Hodges bat. i really liked it but did not have the money. The model number on the knob ends in a S dont it. I have a bat just like it but its a Robinson type(Jackie Robinson) from 1958 which is post career. But the guys at Mears think its just a bat ordered by another major leaguer or something?

    Also with the joe dimaggio bats that i looked up from past auctions i seen none with a flared handle. So im guessing team index?

    Yes it's a 123S. This is my cheapest alternative to a real Hodges gamer. Hodges didn't use 33" bats but it's a pro model.

    According to karamaxjoe's post bat can be ordered by other player on other teams. Good information.

    David

    Leave a comment:


  • karamaxjoe
    replied
    Re: joe di bat!

    On the MEARS website Dave Grob has weighed in on this subject:

    I got an e-mail asking about Joe DiMaggio D29 bats at 35” ordered before 1950. While these don’t show up in DiMaggio’s personal order sheet by this model and length during this period, I did find these listings as part of Team Order or Team Index Orders.


    Joe DiMaggio D29 35” inch bats prior to 1950:

    Cincinnati Reds Team Index 3-14-45: 35”, 32oz Joe DiMaggio D29

    Baltimore Elite Giants: DiMaggio Model bats 3-4-41 (35”) No model listed

    Birmingham Black Barons: DiMaggio D29, 1-14-47, (35”)

    Boston Braves: DiMaggio D29 35”, 6-20-45

    Newark Eagles: DiMaggio D29 35”, 3-7-45

    This does not mean the bat in question could not have been from an unrecorded or undocumented Joe DiMaggio order, but then you also have to weigh that against what information we do know to be out there as seen in these other non-New York Yankee's index orders. I am running an article on bat use in the Negro Leagues this week and briefly touch on this topic.

    Dave Grob

    Leave a comment:


  • ndevlin
    replied
    Re: joe di bat!

    So how much more did the price go up the seller was talking about?

    Leave a comment:

Working...