GFC Lot #197: 1992 Michael Jordan Olympic Dream Team Game-Used Road Jersey

[jordan23collectibles]

Re: GFC Lot #197: 1992 Michael Jordan Olympic Dream Team Game-Used Road Jersey

Theo, I have never personally contacted Champion but it just seems if there are so many concerns, maybe Champion would know why some jerseys had an extra logo and others's don't.

I often remind people that the companies that make jerseys are not as anal as we are about tags and logos, as often there is a genuine diffrence because no one making the jerseys cared to look.

This is not always the case, but it is a reasonable thought process.

Nice to hear from you - Are you going to Springfield, MA this summer for the inductions?

Joel,

It's nice to hear from you too... I will try to contact Champion USA anytime soon, but it seems odd to see that some jerseys have the registered trademark and the others don't have it all.

There might be 2 templates used for the DT1 jerseys for both the blue and white jerseys, and maybe that is why the registered trademark appears only on the blue jersey.

I remember the Blue jersey on the www.mjauthentic.com website and that jersey also has the registered trademark.

With regards to Springfield, MA induction, I am not sure if I can go there due to work committment, but it is my dream to see MJ in the Naismith BHOF.

Regards,
Theo

[trsent]

Re: GFC Lot #197: 1992 Michael Jordan Olympic Dream Team Game-Used Road Jersey

With regards to Springfield, MA induction, I am not sure if I can go there due to work committment, but it is my dream to see MJ in the Naismith BHOF.

Regards,
Theo

You should be there - Time and money can always be found to follow something you truly appreciate and love.

[kingjammy24]

Re: GFC Lot #197: 1992 Michael Jordan Olympic Dream Team Game-Used Road Jersey

There might be 2 templates used for the DT1 jerseys for both the blue and white jerseys, and maybe that is why the registered trademark appears only on the blue jersey.

what if there's only 1 template? that is, what if the template used on the blue jerseys is the same as was used on the white and the white jerseys do in fact have the registered mark but it's simply not easily visible because the mark itself is white (white registered mark on a white jersey), as it is on the blue jerseys? jordan23, can you check your white jersey and see if there really is no registered mark present?

rudy.

[jordan23collectibles]

Re: GFC Lot #197: 1992 Michael Jordan Olympic Dream Team Game-Used Road Jersey

You should be there - Time and money can always be found to follow something you truly appreciate and love.

Joel,
I am still working it out and I really would love to go since this is a once in a lifetime opportunity to see my idol "MJ" step on that stage.
Theo

[jordan23collectibles]

Re: GFC Lot #197: 1992 Michael Jordan Olympic Dream Team Game-Used Road Jersey

what if there's only 1 template? that is, what if the template used on the blue jerseys is the same as was used on the white and the white jerseys do in fact have the registered mark but it's simply not easily visible because the mark itself is white (white registered mark on a white jersey), as it is on the blue jerseys? jordan23, can you check your white jersey and see if there really is no registered mark present?

rudy.

Rudy,
I looked at my white jersey and there is no trademark that is visible to the naked eye..
I think the next step is to find somebody from Champion USA to confirm why there is no trademark in the white jersey...
Thank you for all you photos and your insight to this thread.
Regards,
Theo

[nickacs]

Re: GFC Lot #197: 1992 Michael Jordan Olympic Dream Team Game-Used Road Jersey

Interesting, has anyone noticed that GF threw up as their last pic in the GF 2009 auction with the Jordan blue road Olympics jersey with a blowup of a Getty pic showing no registered trademark?!

So, were there different print runs of the Olympic road jerseys now, some with and without the registered trademark?? Grrr.. just when you think you found something now it's making me think it "might" be legit??

Hmmm...