Manny and Big Popout Tested Positive in 2003

[suicide_squeeze]

Re: Manny and Big Popout Tested Positive in 2003

I might be jaded, but some might see Garciaparra's theories about the illegitimacy the list as laying down some base talking points for when the full list is revealed.

One of his "ideas" was that some players didn't take the test and told the Union to mark them down as positive. These "phantom positives" were from players who wanted future testing so wanted enough positive to invoke it. Garciaparra said that the list thus has numerous positive tests from players who not only didn't use PEDs but never took the test. It was soon after revealed that players were only listed as positive after the submitted a urine simple that failed. But it was a nice try (not quite), Nomar.

You don't think Nomar's exploding groin and hamstrings have anything to do with possibly abusing steroids over the years...........do you!???

[yanks12025]

Re: Manny and Big Popout Tested Positive in 2003

What do you guys think of what David Ortiz had to say the other day. I think he's a huge fraud and wont be a man and say that he used. The stats prove it. I also like how the union supported Ortiz 100% but with the other players who's names came out could care less, and once again baseball tonight defends their believed red sox players 100%.

[BrewCrewSackers]

Re: Manny and Big Popout Tested Positive in 2003

I can't wait till Pujols gets named. Maybe the New York Times will throw that one out when they need a profit boost.

[gameused]

Re: Manny and Big Popout Tested Positive in 2003

I can't wait till Pujols gets named. Maybe the New York Times will throw that one out when they need a profit boost.

I find that comment really immature, but since it's coming from a Brewers fan I can understand how you try to ease the pain of losing that NL Central division every year. Do us all a favor and either grow up or shut up!!